- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If the Apollo landings were fake, the how did NASA get the moon rocks right?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 2:54 pm to ThatTahoeOverThere
Posted on 1/13/26 at 2:54 pm to ThatTahoeOverThere
quote:
Why do people need to believe we went to the moon?
Why do people need to believe we didnt?
Why do people need to believe the earth is flat when it isn't?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 2:56 pm to Stonehog
quote:
What we continue to see even today is that boomers will believe anything they see on television.
Millennials will believe anything they see on the internet. Like the moon landing being fake.
We could do this all night.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:01 pm to 4Bagger
quote:
Do the sheep that believe man landed on the moon even know how far away the moon is from earth? It's 10x farther than the orbit of the international space station. And to think man went 250,000 miles above earth half a century ago but hasn't gone since. You people need to wake up.
50 years isn't that long in the grand scheme of things.
Plus we needed the money for lgbtq studies and trans sesame street.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:04 pm to Stonehog
quote:
What we continue to see even today is that boomers will believe anything they see on television. If you suggest the moon landing was fake to a boomer, 100 percent of the time they will say "It can't be fake, I watched it on tv." Try it sometime.
And we will continue to see idiots like you claim it was fake with no convincing evidence at all to support your moronic conspiracy theories.
This post was edited on 1/13/26 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:06 pm to Lonnie Utah
Didnt an Indian (dot) satellite just fly over it and you can clearly see it.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:09 pm to 4Bagger
quote:
Do the sheep that believe man landed on the moon even know how far away the moon is from earth? It's 10x farther than the orbit of the international space station. And to think man went 250,000 miles above earth half a century ago but hasn't gone since. You people need to wake up.
So let's see , we went, have no real great motivation to go back, so that means that we never went in the first place right?
You passed 5th grade logic 101? If so you need to sue the school for giving you a social promotion passing grade.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:11 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Because Voyager 1 and 2 were both one way missions
Correct. And the same goes for any attempt to put man on the moon, and exactly why it never happened.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:23 pm to 4Bagger
quote:
Do the sheep that believe man landed on the moon even know how far away the moon is from earth? It's 10x farther than the orbit of the international space station. And to think man went 250,000 miles above earth half a century ago but hasn't gone since. You people need to wake up.
Here we go again--
We made 2 one way, ongoing missions to outside the solar system; therefore, that means we couldn't have done a two way return mission from the Moon, right?
Man, stop humiliating yourself.
This post was edited on 1/13/26 at 7:00 pm
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:27 pm to 4Bagger
quote:
Do the sheep that believe man landed on the moon even know how far away the moon is from earth? It's 10x farther than the orbit of the international space station. And to think man went 250,000 miles above earth half a century ago but hasn't gone since. You people need to wake up.
Do you know how far away mars is? The tech that got us there, the delta rocket, is from the 50s
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:31 pm to HattiesburgTiger5439
quote:
The argument isnt that we havent been to the moon or that we didnt go to the moon and Land on the moon. The whole argument is that we didnt put people on the moon.
No matter what anyone says we didnt have the technology back then to make this a reality. B
So we didn't have the tech? LINK?
We had the know how and tech to develop Nukes decades before the Moon landing, but not enough Brain power to actually do it right?
Idiot.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:41 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
someone who thinks they’re so smart you'd think they'd at least understand basic grammar and spelling.
I like this part...
quote:
Big money cooperations, governments, etc all care about one thing money and Power and will kill and lie to achieve it.
I'll assume he meant corporations... But then says that they are only after ONE thing.,. Then lists 2... Probably drinking.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:45 pm to alphaandomega
quote:
Didnt an Indian (dot) satellite just fly over it and you can clearly see it.
You can't expect me to believe that H1B satellite that was probably just dropping trash and poop on the moon.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:26 pm to Lonnie Utah
Were you present for the testing?
There’s part of your answer
There’s part of your answer
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:32 pm to Lonnie Utah
Also
Evidence Supporting the Moon Landing
Third-Party Verification
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO): High-definition images taken by the LRO show the Apollo landing sites, including the Lunar Module descent stages and astronaut tracks.
Independent Tracking: Various organizations and countries tracked the Apollo missions, confirming their trajectories and landings.
Technical Aspects of the Footage
Frame Rate: The moon landing footage was recorded at 10 frames per second using Slow Scan Television (SSTV), not standard video, making it difficult to fake with the technology of the time.
Lighting and Shadows: The shadows in the photos appear non-parallel due to perspective, a common optical illusion, not multiple light sources.
Physical Evidence
Flag Movement: The American flag appears to wave due to a horizontal rod that holds it outstretched. Once set, it remains still, consistent with the lack of atmosphere on the Moon.
Footprints: The footprints left by astronauts are distinct and were made by lunar overshoes, which provided traction in the Moon's dust.
Scientific Consensus
Expert Opinions: Reputable scientists and experts in astronomy regard the conspiracy theories as pseudoscience, with no credible evidence supporting the claims that the landings were faked.
Public Polls: While some people believe in the conspiracy theories, the majority of scientific communities and historical evidence support the reality of the moon landings.
These points collectively provide strong evidence that the moon landings were genuine and not staged.
Source: Gemini.
Evidence Supporting the Moon Landing
Third-Party Verification
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO): High-definition images taken by the LRO show the Apollo landing sites, including the Lunar Module descent stages and astronaut tracks.
Independent Tracking: Various organizations and countries tracked the Apollo missions, confirming their trajectories and landings.
Technical Aspects of the Footage
Frame Rate: The moon landing footage was recorded at 10 frames per second using Slow Scan Television (SSTV), not standard video, making it difficult to fake with the technology of the time.
Lighting and Shadows: The shadows in the photos appear non-parallel due to perspective, a common optical illusion, not multiple light sources.
Physical Evidence
Flag Movement: The American flag appears to wave due to a horizontal rod that holds it outstretched. Once set, it remains still, consistent with the lack of atmosphere on the Moon.
Footprints: The footprints left by astronauts are distinct and were made by lunar overshoes, which provided traction in the Moon's dust.
Scientific Consensus
Expert Opinions: Reputable scientists and experts in astronomy regard the conspiracy theories as pseudoscience, with no credible evidence supporting the claims that the landings were faked.
Public Polls: While some people believe in the conspiracy theories, the majority of scientific communities and historical evidence support the reality of the moon landings.
These points collectively provide strong evidence that the moon landings were genuine and not staged.
Source: Gemini.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 7:08 pm to Burt Reynolds
What if I told you the Government thinks we are stupid and we will believe anything?
Woukd you believe me?
Woukd you believe me?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 7:08 pm to Lonnie Utah
How did the electromagnetic waves carrying the television and radio communications between the Moon and the Earth get through the Radiation Belt that surrounds the Earth?
Never mind. Grok explains it very well.
Never mind. Grok explains it very well.
This post was edited on 1/13/26 at 7:12 pm
Posted on 1/13/26 at 7:11 pm to Lonnie Utah
They’re retards here that still think the Earth is flat.
Come on man, everything is a conspiracy…
Come on man, everything is a conspiracy…
Posted on 1/13/26 at 7:13 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Lonnie Utah
Keep fighting the good fight, but we both know that these threads are a bat signal for all of the tards
Posted on 1/13/26 at 7:14 pm to JEC119
Yes; but multiple governments other than ours confirmed the moon landing
Posted on 1/13/26 at 7:15 pm to Lexis Dad
quote:
we both know that these threads are a bat signal for all of the tards
Why do you think I post them?
This post was edited on 1/13/26 at 7:16 pm
Back to top


0






