- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Japanese people aren't having sex. And nobody knows why
Posted on 1/14/26 at 11:01 am to Shexter
Posted on 1/14/26 at 11:01 am to Shexter
quote:
Japanese people aren't having sex. And nobody knows why
In Japanese society, when you are 18 years old you are fighting hard to get into college and then studying hard to learn and graduate and get a job. By the time you are 22-23 you are beginning your career working 90 hrs week to get ahead. You have no time for relationships.
In the land of Bubba Redneck, at 18 you graduate high school barely able to read and write, but enormous time and energy for coitus and procreation, more often than not with multiple partners.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:00 pm to Hangover Haven
quote:
Hard to put your dick in pixilation.
Posted on 1/14/26 at 1:12 pm to deltaland
quote:
I work anywhere from 60-100 hours a week depending on time of year
why the frick would you brag about this?
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:09 am to Penrod
quote:It’s literally not in their study. They didn't use any other data sources at all, nor did they claim to. This is just something a random journalist said while reporting on the study (or rather, your version of what a journalist said about a study--we're playing a serious game of telephone here). There was no correlation analysis reported at all.
That’s just saying they used primary sources of data rather than polling people themselves. Nothing wrong with that.
"Using primary sources of data rather than polling people themselves"--this is gobbledygook. There is no such thing as this. The survey results (in your words "polling people themselves") ARE the primary data.
Analyzing data gathered by other researchers is called secondary data analysis, and it’s its own whole methodological subfield. But that's not what happened here anyway.
You already got called out for not understanding what a statistical correlation is. Now you're just stringing together random research-related terms, trying to sound smart.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 12:56 pm
Back to top

0






