Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Mandeville to consider banning smoking in bars | Page 7 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: Mandeville to consider banning smoking in bars

Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:10 pm to
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
121320 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:10 pm to
So? Because you choose to be in a bar does not mean you automatically approve of some trailer trash smoking near you. What % of the public would be against this? I'd suspect very little.

Do you ? Aren't you 20?
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143780 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:10 pm to
I tend to agree with "don't like it, don't go". The business owners have to deal with the potential loss of business themselves. I'm a non-smoker and if a bar allows cigs inside I either anticipate smelling like shite or don't go.

ETA: my main point is that the government shouldn't be regulating this much of what businesses do. It'd be like saying no alcohol in restaurants
This post was edited on 6/25/17 at 12:13 pm
Posted by lsunurse
Member since Dec 2005
129146 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

And good luck finding non smoking bars in small towns in South Louisiana.


Maybe in 10 more years. Takes a little time for those towns in Louisiana to catch up to the rest of the nation.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
121320 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:12 pm to
No shite. It's absurd this is an even an issue.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115984 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

So? Because you choose to be in a bar does not mean you automatically approve of some trailer trash smoking near you. W


How tight are the ropes that are forcing you to be there? I don't approve of my buddy fricking the fat girl with a herp on her lip at the end of the bar but he choose to do that

quote:

Do you ? Aren't you 20?


I'm 24. Not sure what the point of my age is
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
121320 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:13 pm to
So, because you engage in something that means you have no right to want it to be better for you and the public? Seems pretty simplistic and stupid.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18703 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

Other cities all over the U.S. have enacted smoking bans in bars YEARS ago...and the bars are still open and thriving.



Yeah that's bullshite.

My company had a big maintenance contract with a chain of truck stop casinos in the area. When the smoking ban was enacted, business declined dramatically. We lost our contract. Business owner specifically cited the smoking ban as the reason. I lost hours at my job. Some of the locations closed.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115984 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

So, because you engage in something that means you have no right to want it to be better for you and the public? Seems pretty simplistic and stupid.


You willingly engage in an activity. You know the risks. Why would I feel sorry for you smelling smoke in a smoking bar? That's like going to a football game and complaining about the noise.
Posted by Big_Slim
Mogadishu
Member since Apr 2016
3979 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Where is this constitutionally protected "right" to smoke in bars?


Jesus Christ retard alert. Is this an actual comment? From your head? Where's your constitutional right to be a little pussy and bitch about inhaling a little smoke. Jesus Christ I don't understand the desire to take the choice from the business owner. But whatever, save me daddy government from all those meanie smokers because I'm too much of a sheep to make my own decisions and let the market work naturally.
This post was edited on 6/25/17 at 12:17 pm
Posted by TigernMS12
Member since Jan 2013
5677 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Does a non-smoker have a right to demand that someone take the financial risk to open a bar and then tell that owner how he should run his business? If the owner wants to serve only customers that are okay with smoking, why should a non-smoker be able to use government to force the owner to not allow smoking? It's his damn business. He doesn't want or need the militant non-smoker's business.


I guess the bar owner should just be able to say frick drinking age laws too because he'll make more money being able to sell to more people.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115984 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

I tend to agree with "don't like it, don't go". The business owners have to deal with the potential loss of business themselves. I'm a non-smoker and if a bar allows cigs inside I either anticipate smelling like shite or don't go. ETA: my main point is that the government shouldn't be regulating this much of what businesses do. It'd be like saying no alcohol in restaurants


It's amazing people can't grasp this concept.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115984 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

I guess the bar owner should just be able to say frick drinking age laws too because he'll make more money being able to sell to more people.


You seem to be under the impression that smoking is illegal. It is not. Underage drinking is illegal.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
121320 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:18 pm to
Why should I feel sorry for you having to go smoke outside? You still can patronize any bar you want and smoke outside.
This post was edited on 6/25/17 at 12:19 pm
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
121320 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:19 pm to
You sound upset, baw. Mad that you have to go outside to smoke on you death sticks? At least they haven't touched your Big Gulps yet.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115984 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Why should I feel sorry for you having to go smoke outside?


Why can't you go to a bar that doesn't allow smoking and smoker go to a bar that does?

You are mistaken for what I want. I'm not saying every bar should allow smoking, I'm saying every bar should have to right to decide that for themselves.


Also I will state again that I have never smoked in my life and hate the smell of it. But I hate overregulation every more.
Posted by Big_Slim
Mogadishu
Member since Apr 2016
3979 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:20 pm to
You're doing work in this thread. I would have elaborated more on my responses but you've covered the fundamental issue effectively, and I don't understand how the commies dont get this
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:20 pm to
quote:


I guess the bar owner should just be able to say frick drinking age laws


Which ones? Closing on Sunday? Shutting down at 2 am?

Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
59634 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

I tend to agree with "don't like it, don't go". The business owners have to deal with the potential loss of business themselves. I'm a non-smoker and if a bar allows cigs inside I either anticipate smelling like shite or don't go.

it's completely selfish to support banning smoking in bars. frick the owner and the regular patrons, i don't like smoke in the air!
Posted by TigernMS12
Member since Jan 2013
5677 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

You seem to be under the impression that smoking is illegal.


When a city creates an law/ordinance to prohibit smoking in certain areas that is enforceable by fine, it is in fact illegal to do so in those areas.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
121320 posts
Posted on 6/25/17 at 12:21 pm to
This isn't "over regulation". The general public has been behind anti smoking measures for years, even in red states.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram