- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Motta/Giles Trial
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:20 pm to BK Lounge
Posted on 3/13/26 at 1:20 pm to BK Lounge
quote:
to give you an idea about her body, she told me that she’d recently been Jessica Biel’s body double for a nude scene in a film Biel did with her then-boyfriend.. he was one of the actors named Chris, not sure which one .. anyway, Vanessa proceeds to tell me the whole story , and about how Jessica was right off camera, directing Vanessa and the guy in the sex scene .. it stuck with me b/c that’s not the type of story you easily forget .
The film: London (2005)
The "Chris": Captain "Hates" America
With a rudimentary knowledge of how internet searches work, one can find the scene quite easily.
This post was edited on 3/13/26 at 1:21 pm
0
Posted on 3/14/26 at 1:49 pm to cgrand
quote:
Tanzanika Ruffin
Know it. A real POS.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 7:20 pm to KemoSabe65
closing arguments were today, case is with the jury
defense:
defense:
quote:
Motta, her lawyer argued, was a green litigator blinded both by a fiery competitive streak and by a relationship with an older lover — the disbarred lawyer Sean Alfortish. Calling Alfortish a “con man,” defense lawyer Sean Toomey said Alfortish manipulated the younger Motta into pressing forward with bogus cases. “That makes her an inexperienced, maybe stupid, lawyer,” Toomey said. “It doesn’t make her a criminal.”
quote:
The defense attorneys presented no witnesses; neither Giles nor Motta took the witness stand
quote:no witnesses, no testimony, and the defense is they were too stupid to know the cases were fraudulent
While their attorneys portrayed Giles and Motta as dim-witted legal minds, McLaren pointed to text messages that the jury viewed, in which Labeaud and Giles used food lingo to allegedly plot out collisions. “What do you think they were talking about? The Saints? The weather?” McLaren said. “He and Mr. Giles had a well-oiled fraud machine.”
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:51 pm to cgrand
Did any of Motta’s post-indictment gambling come up?
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:06 pm to cgrand
I hope she is acquitted. Too nice of a body to be in jail and she has a kid.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:09 pm to cgrand
The fact this has been a big influence to our insurance rates going up really pi**es me off. They should be paying us.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:11 pm to Xcalibur2017
They need to investigate anyone and everyone that worked or is working at the King Firm- all of those guys have punchable faces. Can they look and be anymore scumbags? Bunch of dopes
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:33 pm to Dizz
quote:
I dont get how the rest of the King Firm avoided prosecution.
I’m sure other partners or lawyers working for the King Firm are having trouble sleeping at night- at least they should be
Posted on 3/20/26 at 6:35 am to Xcalibur2017
Criminal defense work sounds lucrative- get paid well, do a couple of cross examinations, call no witnesses, say my client was dumb in closing- and sit down..
Posted on 3/20/26 at 7:57 am to Joehat
quote:
Criminal defense work sounds lucrative- get paid well, do a couple of cross examinations, call no witnesses, say my client was dumb in closing- and sit down..
You only keep getting those jobs if it actually works.
Not sure I see it working here unless the jury got paid off.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 12:40 pm to Xcalibur2017
quote:
I’m sure other partners or lawyers working for the King Firm are having trouble sleeping at night- at least they should be
If they were going to get indicted it would have happened. The general thought seems to be that this is climax of the investigation.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:04 pm to Dizz
Can someone explain why the King Firm is a Defendant but it its individual members outside of Giles are not? They are all criminals.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:06 pm to REG861
i'm guessing that tha\ere wasnt evidence to indict the other partners personally . not to make a joke about it but that seems obvious
. not to make a joke about it but that seems obviousPosted on 3/20/26 at 1:08 pm to cgrand
I just don’t buy that they couldn’t find enough to roll with. If you indict the firm might as well indict the individuals. There’s been testimony about Milazzo playing tough guy when confronted with the cases being bullshite, and communications between Motta and other lawyers alerting them to the feds being on their trail.
This post was edited on 3/20/26 at 1:12 pm
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:09 pm to biglego
quote:
I hope she is acquitted. Too nice of a body to be in jail and she has a kid.
frick em. Lock up all thugs. DGAF if you have a kid. Thug is a thug
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:09 pm to REG861
quote:all purchases are completely voluntary
I just don’t buy that they couldn’t find enough to roll with.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:15 pm to biglego
quote:
Too nice of a body to be in jail and she has a kid.
That’s a flattering picture of her. I saw her at a conference last year, and she was as big as a house. And I mean BIG.
2026 - Vanessa Motta Walking Into Court
Appears that she’s on the Ozempic, unless she managed to lose 70 lbs in a year, which is doable, possibly even due to stress, but unlikely. Probably bossing up for life after disbarment.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 1:19 pm to cgrand
quote:
Tanzanika Ruffin
More like Tanzanian Dindunuffin.
Posted on 3/20/26 at 2:26 pm to danilo
Verdict’s in. Findings TBD…
Page 3 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News