- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/10/19 at 3:34 pm to Bedhog
quote:
flying under ‘me’ belt already
Soooo, an Irishman?
Posted on 9/10/19 at 3:36 pm to Pat Sajak
quote:
Subtle “I don’t fly coach any more,” brag.
Even coach has more legroom than that
Posted on 9/10/19 at 3:37 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
Even coach has more legroom than that
no TSA or parking hassle though
Posted on 9/10/19 at 3:40 pm to PhilipMarlowe
I've had 2 other 206 Cessnas. Both were turbo models for altitude. The turbos climbed very good and held good speed at 18,000' sucking on oxygen. Best they would do was about 165kts with no tail wind. This plane isnt rated for that kind of altitude but will still comfortably go to 13,000 but it will take a while to get there.
But sea level performance is equivalent. Maintenance is way easier and total engine overhauls come way less frequently.
But sea level performance is equivalent. Maintenance is way easier and total engine overhauls come way less frequently.
Posted on 9/10/19 at 3:44 pm to jbgleason
I didnt realize it would ,well, or I would come across that way. I was genuinely interested in finding out more about this plane since it kinda fell in between models at that time. No hard feelings.
BTW, Geauxx used to work for me and flew my planes flawlessly.
BTW, Geauxx used to work for me and flew my planes flawlessly.
Popular
Back to top

0






