Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us News reporting U-High kid fell overboard | Page 60 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: News reporting U-High kid fell overboard

Posted on 6/4/23 at 10:59 am to
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62869 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Again, there weren't more than a handful of kids who were aware he even jumped in.


Ok. So?
Posted by Mr Clean
Power I-Formation
Member since Aug 2006
53266 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:02 am to
quote:

I'm out


I don’t believe you. You’ll be back
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
20953 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:09 am to
quote:

God forbid any of you are ever on a jury of any importance.

People like you and angel make me consider bench trials more and more.
Posted by LSUAngelHere1
Watson
Member since Jan 2018
10137 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:19 am to
quote:

This is exactly what he’s talking about. Give it a goddam rest and stfu.

So they can bring it up and if I reply Im the one who derailed the thread? Got it.
Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1688 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:19 am to
quote:

God forbid any of you are ever on a jury of any importance.


Are you arguing that it is beyond a reasonable doubt that he was attacked by a shark during the 20 sec video? That’s pretty dumb.
Posted by GatorPA84
PNW
Member since Sep 2016
6138 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:20 am to
Dude is done
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Yall are obtuse for not weighing all the evidence including him punching at the shark 3 times and getting dragged under. God forbid any of you are ever on a jury of any importance.


I know you arent serious because youre a troll but the irony here outweighs the troll
Posted by Possumslayer
Pascagoula
Member since Jan 2018
6474 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:28 am to
I don’t get why yall are taking this damn story so personal.
Posted by LSUFAITHFUL
Member since Oct 2007
1089 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Are you arguing that it is beyond a reasonable doubt that he was attacked by a shark during the 20 sec video? That’s pretty dumb.


Jesus. No one is arguing the shark could be convicted in a criminal trial where the burden is beyond a reasonable doubt. So your question is stupid.

Some people believe it’s more likely than not that he was killed by a shark based on what they see in the video. Why does that upset people?
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62869 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Some people believe it’s more likely than not that he was killed by a shark based on what they see in the video. Why does that upset people?


I’d turn your question back around. It seems as if the people arguing that it was a shark are far more emotional than others.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25585 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:32 am to
quote:

You are as annoying


I agree with this,

quote:

how can you have this new evidence that clearly shows him bring drug underwater WITH a girl saying "there's a shark" and clear footage of cam punching the water 3 times where the shark is (something that anybody who knows anything about swimming in lakes / gulf / ocean knows to do) and still say "NO evidence".




Not so sure about all of this.
Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1688 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Jesus. No one is arguing the shark could be convicted in a criminal trial where the burden is beyond a reasonable doubt. So your question is stupid.


Sure sounded like that was what SisWinston was saying.

quote:

Why does that upset people?


Seems like the only people that are upset are the ones who “know” they see a kid get eaten by a shark. I’m just dumbfounded that people can watch some shitty video and come to absolute conclusions like that. It’s dumb. Objectively.
Posted by LSUFAITHFUL
Member since Oct 2007
1089 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:37 am to
quote:

I’d turn your question back around. It seems as if the people arguing that it was a shark are far more emotional than others.


I think some people are just debating and some people are overly emotional on both sides of the argument. There are plenty of people saying things like there is absolutely no evidence that a shark was involved, there’s a 1% chance a shark was involved, people are wish casting, etc. That take is patently false.

I only had to go back 4 pages to support what I just said.

quote:

there's 0 evidence either way.

The odds of it being a shark are probably <1%. If it is some type of animal, then it's likely a dolphin. Sharks are extremely timid.

Yep. Odds of a shark being right there then attacking are extremely low. People see what they want to see most of the time.

Because sharks are just laying in wait to eat drunk people on boats.

There’s some next-level conjecture and wish casting ITT.

Nothing in that video looks like a shark attack,
This post was edited on 6/4/23 at 11:48 am
Posted by DomincDecoco
RIP Ronnie fights Thoth’s loafers
Member since Oct 2018
11821 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:48 am to
quote:

Seems like the only people that are upset are the ones who “know” they see a kid get eaten by a shark. I’m just dumbfounded that people can watch some shitty video and come to absolute conclusions like that. It’s dumb. Objectively.


Its the new Zapruder film with i lnfinitely more "experts" here on the OT

How dare you question them!
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62869 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:52 am to
Now compare what you just quoted to the hysterical fit that SirWinston just had.
Posted by LSUFAITHFUL
Member since Oct 2007
1089 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:56 am to


quote:

Now compare what you just quoted to the hysterical fit that SirWinston just had.


No. Because I was posting that to support that people are emotional in both sides of the argument, not just the people that see the shark. I literally just said this in the very same post. Comprehension is hard isn’t it.?

quote:

I think some people are just debating and some people are overly emotional on both sides of the argument.
Posted by RS Dawg
Member since May 2023
15 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:56 am to
Apparently this is a long running feud between some of these posters we are observing. They are just using the shark/no-shark positions as pretexts to yell at each other.
Posted by Impotent Waffle
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
10116 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:57 am to
First confirmed Orca attack is possibly in play here…………..
Posted by CrimsonTideMD
Member since Dec 2010
7115 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Its the new Zapruder film


Or that whole blue dress/gold dress optical illusion thing.



It’s fascinating how 2 people can see of hear the exact same, but their brains process the signals differently.


The mind boggles.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62869 posts
Posted on 6/4/23 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Comprehension is hard isn’t it.?


Indeed it appears to be so for you. You’re even getting angry in your response to me.

My point was that what you quoted was barely emotional if at all.
Jump to page
Page First 58 59 60 61 62 ... 64
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 60 of 64Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram