- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Old video of a WWII fighter pilot explaining why you didn't shoot parachuting airmen
Posted on 1/20/26 at 9:47 am to Lonnie Utah
Posted on 1/20/26 at 9:47 am to Lonnie Utah
quote:Seems to me, this would only apply if the guy was parachuting over your land (their enemy's land). In that case, they would have the opportunity to surrender. But if they were over their own land, they wouldn't be in a position to surrender, and they could live to fight another day. Why not take them out?
The Geneva Conventions speaks to this.
quote:
Under international law (Geneva Conventions Protocol I), it's a war crime to attack pilots/aircrew parachuting from a damaged aircraft ("in distress"), as they are hors de combat (out of the fight) and must be given a chance to surrender; however, this protection doesn't apply to airborne troops (paratroopers) on an active attack mission, who a classified as enemy combatants and remain legitimate targets during descent.
Popular
Back to top

0




