- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted on 1/11/26 at 11:48 am to TulsaSooner78
Posted on 1/11/26 at 11:48 am to TulsaSooner78
quote:
I never want to hear anyone say that Russia is a major threat to either the US or NATO ever again.
They might not be as big of a threat to invade us or the original NATO countries, but until they get rid of the nukes or a way is ever discovered to neutralize them and/or truly defend the US against them they are still a threat.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 12:12 pm to jmarto1
Is it possible that the Russians have:
1) spent the last several years grinding the Ukraine military down to the point that now it is not capable of resisting much longer?
2) Successfully avoided an all out conflict w NATO during a period where they were not prepared. Now they are prepared. I don’t think NATO wants any part of the Russian military right now.
3)Thru Putin’s cautious and limited approach won over much of the public around the world. The majority of the planet sees the USA as the aggressive, imperial force endangering sovereignty around the globe.
4) The longer he resists an overreaction the weaker the American position becomes. China/Russia/India/Brazil are no longer interested in the post WWII world order.
This will not end well for the US.
1) spent the last several years grinding the Ukraine military down to the point that now it is not capable of resisting much longer?
2) Successfully avoided an all out conflict w NATO during a period where they were not prepared. Now they are prepared. I don’t think NATO wants any part of the Russian military right now.
3)Thru Putin’s cautious and limited approach won over much of the public around the world. The majority of the planet sees the USA as the aggressive, imperial force endangering sovereignty around the globe.
4) The longer he resists an overreaction the weaker the American position becomes. China/Russia/India/Brazil are no longer interested in the post WWII world order.
This will not end well for the US.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 12:13 pm to czechtiger
quote:
Is it possible that the Russians have: 1) spent the last several years grinding the Ukraine military down to the point that now it is not capable of resisting much longer? 2) Successfully avoided an all out conflict w NATO during a period where they were not prepared. Now they are prepared. I don’t think NATO wants any part of the Russian military right now. 3)Thru Putin’s cautious and limited approach won over much of the public around the world. The majority of the planet sees the USA as the aggressive, imperial force endangering sovereignty around the globe. 4) The longer he resists an overreaction the weaker the American position becomes. China/Russia/India/Brazil are no longer interested in the post WWII world order. This will not end well for the US.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 12:18 pm to REG861
You’re very articulate. Member of the debate club?
Posted on 1/11/26 at 12:37 pm to czechtiger
quote:
You’re very articulate. Member of the debate club?
Sorry, the only appropriate response is to laugh at you relentlessly.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 12:42 pm to TulsaSooner78
quote:
Compare and contrast with how quickly we just vanquished Venezuela.
That's TBD, we grabbed two people and proved the government incompetent. That doesn't mean anything meaningful will have changed 6 months ago (I hope it does, but I've watched this sort of optimism get snuffed out by reality too many times.)
quote:
Russia is a major threat to either the US or NATO ever again.
If you're only thinking about conventional warfare, maybe. They could cut direct Internet traffic from the EU/UKI to the US pretty easily. Should both the EU and the US care? Sure. You know how much US firms would lose on the daily with doubled latency to execute financial trades on the London stock exchange and vice versa?
North Korea has zero chance of touching us conventionally, but they sure can steal military data with great success.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 12:52 pm to czechtiger
quote:
d. I don’t think NATO wants any part of the Russian military right now.
What?
quote:
The majority of the planet sees the USA as the aggressive, imperial force endangering sovereignty around the globe.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 1:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
It’s amazing what brainwashing has done to the American population.
But go ahead, ignore the incoming arse whooping.
But go ahead, ignore the incoming arse whooping.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 1:28 pm to subMOA
quote:
know they won’t run out of money- but at what point in time does it become not feasible anymore to keep throwing shite at Ukraine?
Never.
Ukraines land from a farming standpoint is a big deal for the entire continent.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 1:39 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
Putin’s 3-day “Special Military Operation” to take Ukraine has now lasted longer than the German-Soviet War 1941-1945

Posted on 1/11/26 at 1:40 pm to czechtiger
quote:
It’s amazing what brainwashing has done to the American population.
But go ahead, ignore the incoming arse whooping
Speaking of brainwashing.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 1:53 pm to czechtiger
quote:
It’s amazing what brainwashing has done to the American population. But go ahead, ignore the incoming arse whooping.

Posted on 1/11/26 at 2:00 pm to RollTide1987
History needs to remember this as “Putin’s Stupid War.” He is accelerating their demographic decline while weakening them strategically, especially towards China, who certainly has it’s eyes on Siberia.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 2:13 pm to RollTide1987
No one has done more damage to the Russian Federation than Vladimir Putin. And that dumbass thinks he’s saving the Motherland.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 2:47 pm to willymeaux
quote:
Yet US is able to do a full regime change,

Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:36 pm to LemmyLives
To the DV retards, the latency is a thing, and cost millions in seconds.
But keep pretending like the amount of time it takes to go from dedicated fiber from NYC to LON is different from NYC to VA to SFO to Hong Kong to LON is different.
quote:
EXA already owns and operates the lowest latency transatlantic cable, EXA Express, and this additional technology enhancement is crucial in applications like financial trading, where minimal delays are imperative for maintaining a competitive edge.
But keep pretending like the amount of time it takes to go from dedicated fiber from NYC to LON is different from NYC to VA to SFO to Hong Kong to LON is different.
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:40 pm to jizzle6609
quote:
Ukraines land from a farming standpoint is a big deal for the entire continent.
Ironically, it becomes more important as the EU cripples its own farmers, especially the Dutch and the French. But carbon!
Posted on 1/11/26 at 10:42 pm to TheOcean
quote:
Pretty gigantic fail by Russia
The poli board will tell you he’s just slowly grinding them down, while advancing at a snails pace, and lighting metric tons of rubles on fire every day. Great success.
Posted on 1/12/26 at 7:02 am to LemmyLives
quote:
Ironically, it becomes more important as the EU cripples its own farmers, especially the Dutch and the French. But carbon
Stalin warned the Russians not to lose Ukraine before he died.
He understood the important as did Hitler who wanted it as well to feed his imaginary third reich.
And if yall think what happened in ww2 is bad be thankful Hitler made a couple mistakes because if he takes Russia you would’ve seen murder to a level the holocaust wouldn’t even be able to register on.
This post was edited on 1/12/26 at 7:03 am
Popular
Back to top


0







