- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
czechtiger
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | europe |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | Politics |
| Occupation: | Golf |
| Number of Posts: | 122 |
| Registered on: | 8/5/2013 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: What is the appropriate age to start a family?
Posted by czechtiger on 1/14/26 at 7:11 am to czechtiger
And just for the record I think the ideal would be before 30.
For most almost unthinkable w univ/masters programs/student loans etc.
For most almost unthinkable w univ/masters programs/student loans etc.
1
What is the appropriate age to start a family?
Posted by czechtiger on 1/14/26 at 7:05 am
With the ever increasing scandals about minors and sexual activity in the media, I have two observations:
1) The modern world has retarded the maturation process. What has caused this?
2) Mother Nature and past history indicates pregnancy is possible and not uncommon below the age of 18. Is the delay of family formation into the late 20’s or later a good or bad indicator.
Discuss
1) The modern world has retarded the maturation process. What has caused this?
2) Mother Nature and past history indicates pregnancy is possible and not uncommon below the age of 18. Is the delay of family formation into the late 20’s or later a good or bad indicator.
Discuss
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/12/26 at 6:00 pm to Penrod
Have to agree w the facts of the above post but I thought attrited had a different definition.
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/12/26 at 5:51 pm to czechtiger
Try finding alternative sources every once in a while.
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/12/26 at 5:49 pm to IAmNERD
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/12/26 at 5:35 pm to REG861
Read this
-long article, need to scroll down to get the ranking but:
Russian systems have 3 in the Top 6…..including number 1&2.
Did this help?? Was that a North Korean publication?
Your casualty estimates are also way off. Would you like me to find something in that as well?
-long article, need to scroll down to get the ranking but:
Russian systems have 3 in the Top 6…..including number 1&2.
Did this help?? Was that a North Korean publication?
Your casualty estimates are also way off. Would you like me to find something in that as well?
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/12/26 at 5:02 pm to mmmmmbeeer
Where are you getting this information?
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/12/26 at 4:55 pm to REG861
Regarding the clown comment. I’ll have to repeat myself….thats not an argument. Try using your intellect.
Regarding Russian air defense…..Russian air defense systems are recognised all over the world as being as good if not better than American.
Would you like me to post a link?
Or is providing evidence to support a position too much all in one post?
Regarding me being laughed at or downvoted…..thank God I couldn’t care less what the public thinks.
Are you vaxxed?
Regarding Russian air defense…..Russian air defense systems are recognised all over the world as being as good if not better than American.
Would you like me to post a link?
Or is providing evidence to support a position too much all in one post?
Regarding me being laughed at or downvoted…..thank God I couldn’t care less what the public thinks.
Are you vaxxed?
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/12/26 at 3:37 pm to Blueghost1978
Never heard a number that big for Russian casualties.
I usually watch YouTube on this topic but I’m sure Col. MacGregor would dispute that number.
500,000 prob but over a million I doubt very much.
I usually watch YouTube on this topic but I’m sure Col. MacGregor would dispute that number.
500,000 prob but over a million I doubt very much.
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/12/26 at 3:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
Ok, the US military in direct conflict in Ukraine would have to favor the Russian regarding:
1) logistics
2) troop morale
3) industrial capacity
4) fighting experience
Where does US have the advantage?
Military hardware? Our planes & pilots are better? How can we be so sure of this? Everywhere I read how sophisticated Russian air Defense is….
But would like to hear the counter argument
1) logistics
2) troop morale
3) industrial capacity
4) fighting experience
Where does US have the advantage?
Military hardware? Our planes & pilots are better? How can we be so sure of this? Everywhere I read how sophisticated Russian air Defense is….
But would like to hear the counter argument
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/12/26 at 3:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
Wow. The last point I made was regarding whether or not the Russian army had been attrited.
I see no evidence that this has happened.
What are you referring to about me bringing in the US military?
The post above mentioned what would happen if the US engaged.
My point is the US CANNOT directly engage w/o risking nuclear war. This will not happen.
Iran & Venezuela will not illicit a response from Russia but direct engagement by US forces against the Russian military in Ukraine would.
I dont think you made a very cogent point there.
I see no evidence that this has happened.
What are you referring to about me bringing in the US military?
The post above mentioned what would happen if the US engaged.
My point is the US CANNOT directly engage w/o risking nuclear war. This will not happen.
Iran & Venezuela will not illicit a response from Russia but direct engagement by US forces against the Russian military in Ukraine would.
I dont think you made a very cogent point there.
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/12/26 at 2:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
Ok, regarding what would happen if the US engaged….
the US cannot engage directly w/o risking nuclear war. How is in the US interest to risk nuclear war over Ukraine? The risk/reward just misses the mark by miles and miles.
the US cannot engage directly w/o risking nuclear war. How is in the US interest to risk nuclear war over Ukraine? The risk/reward just misses the mark by miles and miles.
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/12/26 at 2:50 pm to CaptainsWafer
Comments like that don’t really qualify as making an argument.
Neither do the little laughing emoticons.
Try and use your intellect and make point.
Neither do the little laughing emoticons.
Try and use your intellect and make point.
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/12/26 at 2:43 pm to Darth_Vader
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/12/26 at 2:28 pm to Penrod
“First, this has already ended well for the US. While Russia has been attrited”
Thanks for having the courtesy to try and make a point.
As far as I can make out the Russian army is bigger and better equipped now than at the beginning of the war.
Isn’t that the opposite of “being attrited”?
Thanks for having the courtesy to try and make a point.
As far as I can make out the Russian army is bigger and better equipped now than at the beginning of the war.
Isn’t that the opposite of “being attrited”?
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/11/26 at 1:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
It’s amazing what brainwashing has done to the American population.
But go ahead, ignore the incoming arse whooping.
But go ahead, ignore the incoming arse whooping.
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/11/26 at 12:18 pm to REG861
You’re very articulate. Member of the debate club?
re: Putin’s “Special Military Operation” in Ukraine has passed an important milestone
Posted by czechtiger on 1/11/26 at 12:12 pm to jmarto1
Is it possible that the Russians have:
1) spent the last several years grinding the Ukraine military down to the point that now it is not capable of resisting much longer?
2) Successfully avoided an all out conflict w NATO during a period where they were not prepared. Now they are prepared. I don’t think NATO wants any part of the Russian military right now.
3)Thru Putin’s cautious and limited approach won over much of the public around the world. The majority of the planet sees the USA as the aggressive, imperial force endangering sovereignty around the globe.
4) The longer he resists an overreaction the weaker the American position becomes. China/Russia/India/Brazil are no longer interested in the post WWII world order.
This will not end well for the US.
1) spent the last several years grinding the Ukraine military down to the point that now it is not capable of resisting much longer?
2) Successfully avoided an all out conflict w NATO during a period where they were not prepared. Now they are prepared. I don’t think NATO wants any part of the Russian military right now.
3)Thru Putin’s cautious and limited approach won over much of the public around the world. The majority of the planet sees the USA as the aggressive, imperial force endangering sovereignty around the globe.
4) The longer he resists an overreaction the weaker the American position becomes. China/Russia/India/Brazil are no longer interested in the post WWII world order.
This will not end well for the US.
re: When China, Russia, and Iran realized, “We’re fricked.”
Posted by czechtiger on 1/10/26 at 5:48 am to jizzle6609
Just to play devils advocate a little bit to keep the conversation going….
1) The Oreschnik hypersonic missile is better than anything in the US arsenal, correct?
2) The Russians have weathered the sanctions and the Ukraine war quite well, it seems to me. Their army has more soldiers now than at the beginning of the war and they are combat hardened.
3) The Iranian/Venezuelan scenarios have yet to play out….how can you be so certain of success?
Afghanistan? Iraq? Libya?
Yemen?
None of those were successful in the final analysis, no?
1) The Oreschnik hypersonic missile is better than anything in the US arsenal, correct?
2) The Russians have weathered the sanctions and the Ukraine war quite well, it seems to me. Their army has more soldiers now than at the beginning of the war and they are combat hardened.
3) The Iranian/Venezuelan scenarios have yet to play out….how can you be so certain of success?
Afghanistan? Iraq? Libya?
Yemen?
None of those were successful in the final analysis, no?
re: Over 100 human skulls found on mans property - cops say a "horror movie come to life"
Posted by czechtiger on 1/9/26 at 2:59 pm to Bigdawgb
I wish him much luck in hell.
re: Don't tell me what not to do, Mr. Police Officer.
Posted by czechtiger on 1/8/26 at 1:22 pm to Coach72
I watched that entire video.
Multiple bad choices by both parties but damn, you gotta have shite for brains to end up in handcuffs over the issue of window tint.
Multiple bad choices by both parties but damn, you gotta have shite for brains to end up in handcuffs over the issue of window tint.
Popular
8
