- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Smith Shooter's Lawyer "My Client Was Not The Aggressor"
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:17 pm to doublecutter
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:17 pm to doublecutter
quote:
Fuller was a stand up guy, pretty sharp, and is a well respected criminal attorney.
He's all those things, as far as I know. He's at least smart enough to tell the media his client is not guilty, which somehow shocks the legal minds of the OT.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:17 pm to SirSaintly
"Stand your ground".
Called it.
Shooter is a different race though.
Called it.
Shooter is a different race though.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:18 pm to SirSaintly
Not justifiable at all but it does sound like there's a lot more to this story. The business about the cop that killed the perp's father is a strange twist.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:19 pm to fightin tigers
Will be interesting to see what Pierre Thomas and Smith's Wife have to say about this
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:21 pm to SirSaintly
He got out of his vehicle, and approached Smiths vehicle then shot Smith. There is absolutely no case for self defense even if Smith had a weapon in his hand while he was shot. The shooter made the decision to approach and fire..
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:22 pm to biglego
quote:
I'm glad you aren't an attorney. You'd apparently be telling the media your client is a guilty piece of shite.
Wish it would happen if true, just once.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:22 pm to tiggah1981
Pierre Thomas wasnt in the car.
my guess as to what happened is Smith rear ended the guy, had prob been drinking so tried to flee. Guy caught up and rammed Smith from back after Smith had been impeded by the Impala. They got into argument. Hayes will claim Smith reached for something, so he shot him
my guess as to what happened is Smith rear ended the guy, had prob been drinking so tried to flee. Guy caught up and rammed Smith from back after Smith had been impeded by the Impala. They got into argument. Hayes will claim Smith reached for something, so he shot him
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:22 pm to Asgard Device
quote:
more to this story. The business about the cop that killed the perp's father is a strange twist.
Cop wasn't the killer.
He was named as being on scene.
This will be TrayvonMartin all over again. "Stand your ground".
Hopefully this will show people how stupid that law is, as worded.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:24 pm to rsbd
quote:
He got out of his vehicle, and approached Smiths vehicle then shot Smith. There is absolutely no case for self defense even if Smith had a weapon in his hand while he was shot. The shooter made the decision to approach and fire..
"Verbal altercation" ensued.
What if he thought Smith was reaching for a gun?
Stand your ground
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:27 pm to rsbd
quote:
He got out of his vehicle, and approached Smiths vehicle then shot Smith
quote:
The shooter made the decision to approach and fire..
funny cause the eyewitness had both of the guys out of the car, arguing, at one point. Where you getting your facts?
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:29 pm to magildachunks
No stand your ground here bud, maybe if they were both out of their vehicles.
This post was edited on 4/10/16 at 8:30 pm
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:29 pm to magildachunks
quote:
This will be TrayvonMartin all over again. "Stand your ground".
Hopefully this will show people how stupid that law is, as worded.
No it is not! You can't just start firing rounds at people. The shooter will go to jail for a long time.
Even if Smith threatened to kick his arse this is not enough to start shooting. This is a lot like a case that happened a few years ago where a guy got his neighbor to threaten him so he could shoot him. He ended up in jail 20 to life.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:30 pm to Lester Earl
Smith was shot in his vehicle. As was the wife.. maybe you should spend less time trying to be a know it all and get yourself some facts.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:33 pm to biglego
quote:
You'd apparently be telling the media your client is a guilty piece of shite.
That's how they roll in Wisconsin.
This post was edited on 4/10/16 at 8:35 pm
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:33 pm to rsbd
I heard the witness say words were exchanged with both parties out of the vehicle
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:34 pm to rsbd
quote:
Smith was shot in his vehicle. As was the wife.. maybe you should spend less time trying to be a know it all and get yourself some facts.
"After we exchanged words, he climbed back into his vehicle and 'reached' for something. I thought it was a gun. I feared for my life."
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:35 pm to rsbd
quote:
Smith was shot in his vehicle. As was the wife.. maybe you should spend less time trying to be a know it all and get yourself some facts.
Yes, he was shot in his vehicle. But you seem think Hayes walked up to Smith's vehicle and just blew his brains out.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:38 pm to magildachunks
Then he should have not followed Smith. Once he followed he lost the right to defend himself from someone that was maybe going to get a weapon.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:38 pm to magildachunks
quote:
Cop wasn't the killer.
He was named as being on scene.
Uh. Reading comprehension?
Allegedly the perp's father was killed by a cop. That cop happened to have been involved in some way. Not just as a responder.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:38 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
funny cause the eyewitness had both of the guys out of the car, arguing, at one point.
Link?
Popular
Back to top


0






