- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/19/26 at 5:14 am to holdmuh keystonelite
AI "music" is perfect. TOO perfect! humans make subtle mistakes, the beat may slow slightly. The voice will be slightly off key for a note or two. That is art and REAL. Even many modern "songs" use so many "cheats" that one can hear that there's no real talent there.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 5:18 am to holdmuh keystonelite
quote:
For those curious, Damien Marley was some of those good fake songs I was listening to.
there is a group of fake songs that are called “Damien Marley”?
Posted on 1/19/26 at 6:15 am to deeprig9
quote:
So AI is ripping off the Beatles for great chord progressions.
Got it.
Yup, you just play the top ten thousand songs of a genre into it, then take the samples you want back.
Then a human on the back end does some recording engineering to get rid of anything weird.
There are a number of tools out there for it.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 6:49 am to holdmuh keystonelite
I play guitar, write songs (lyrics and music), then I do a rough demo of those songs at home. I give those songs to a demo studio, where they will use session players and a good singer to re-record them and make them better.
I struggle with recording at home to get even a rough demo that is good enough that I feel comfortable with. It takes a lot of time.
I would like to learn how to use ai to speed that part up, but so far, it seems that it just does canned stuff.
I struggle with recording at home to get even a rough demo that is good enough that I feel comfortable with. It takes a lot of time.
I would like to learn how to use ai to speed that part up, but so far, it seems that it just does canned stuff.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 7:10 am to Everyday Is Saturday
quote:
There is just something about lived human story, rhythm of sound and the authentic feeling it evokes.
When Sully Erna of Godsmack sings I stand alone, the I he sings about is himself.
When an AI prodices a vocal that "sings" it...
Wtf does that even mean.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 7:24 am to Chicken
quote:
part of the allure of real music is that ideas for the melody and lyrics came from the mind of real people...
I've made many many songs on Suno.
What's funny is when you hear a lot of AI music, you realize most of the real music out there sounds just like well done AI.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 7:35 am to i am dan
quote:
What's funny is when you hear a lot of AI music, you realize most of the real music out there sounds just like well done AI.
Agreed.
So much nowadays is wall of sound, 90 or more samples placed electronically across a track.
Its just so overengineered and auto tuned that its a mush.
I prefer to hear the unique harmonics of a singer, not a perfected clean vocal note.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 9:05 am to holdmuh keystonelite
quote:
I just listened to some great music on YouTube that I thought was by a real artist. Turns out it was all AI...but it was better than almost anything I hear that is real. Is this AI all the devils work or should I just believe it's innocent and enjoy it? For those curious, Damien Marley was some of those good fake songs I was listening to.
There was a thread a few months ago with tons of AI songs. It’s weird to think that no person created it and it was made out of thin air from AI. But some of them were actually pretty catchy.
From 10/31/25
quote:
fr33manator
Of course you’re in here thrusting your fricking poetry and songs on people.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 9:09 am to CocomoLSU
AI steals from real people's actual work. Whether it be music or art, it is stealing. The fact that some of you condone stealing in some cases and not others is insane .
There's a great Instagram page called "AI Cop". It exposes these frauds who use AI to steal art and call it their own.
There's a great Instagram page called "AI Cop". It exposes these frauds who use AI to steal art and call it their own.
This post was edited on 1/19/26 at 9:15 am
Posted on 1/19/26 at 9:29 am to BamaSaint
quote:
AI steals from real people's actual work. Whether it be music or art, it is stealing. The fact that some of you condone stealing in some cases and not others is insane . There's a great Instagram page called "AI Cop". It exposes these frauds who use AI to steal art and call it their own.
Is it stealing or just more of a compiler of information? But didn’t the Ed Sheeran court case prove that most music “steals” from other music it is influenced by, like chord progressions and such?
And I’m not arguing “for” AI, more just talking through it. I definitely prefer music by real people.
Posted on 1/19/26 at 9:36 am to holdmuh keystonelite
Music is just the tip of the iceberg…


Posted on 1/19/26 at 9:37 am to CocomoLSU
quote:
And I’m not arguing “for” AI, more just talking through it. I definitely prefer music by real people
Fair point for music. I think the OP is an idiot for preferring it and the guy who wants to use it to sound better should practice more instead of relying AI, but yes I guess the courts settled that. But what about art?
Posted on 1/19/26 at 9:58 am to holdmuh keystonelite
Jeez just go to spotify and search "AI covers"
Some of y'all
Some of y'all
Posted on 1/19/26 at 10:04 am to BamaSaint
If the song is written from an idea that someone came up with, I have no problem with the song. That person has no way to put in a song format without using AI. So he uses it to show his talent that would have never been heard before. So much talent in songwriting is being held back because authors don't have a path to show their works to others. Now they do. I find it strange that you use Chicken's platform to express your views the way you see it, yet you condemn someone expressing their words in a song format. By the way, I love all the different opinions that we share on Tigerdropings. It comes from the heart. Let your words and their songs be heard no matter what. It's the American way... 
Posted on 1/19/26 at 10:11 am to yepitsme
quote:
Let your words and their songs be heard no matter what.
Even if it's stealing others ideas? You sound like you aren't talented enough to play music. So write a poem, a short story, sell your songs to someone who can actually play, anything besides putting your lame lyrics to some lame computer generated music
Posted on 1/19/26 at 12:06 pm to BamaSaint
quote:
Even if it's stealing others ideas?
You realize that pretty much all of music history is pretty much "stealing others ideas" in your ken? (It's not. It's just being being influenced and inspired by, but you seem to think things grow in a vacuum.)
quote:
You sound like you aren't talented enough to play music.
You sound like you aren't talented enough to write songs
You ever sat in on a session? Where the writer is trying to explain to the musician how he wants his music brought to life.
It's the same language you use with AI. You can even upload your own chord progressions if you want.
Look, I'm not gonna say it has the full capability of a human player, but someone on a synthesizer? Definitely.
And if a human player hears a song he likes and wants to make it better and cover it, is that "stealing"? No. It what's been going on since we made the first music. Only thing that gets fishy is who is getting paid how.
This post was edited on 1/19/26 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 1/19/26 at 1:07 pm to holdmuh keystonelite
Hate to say it, but there are some banger AI synthwave tracks out there. The genre kind of just lends itself to AI.
Popular
Back to top


0












