- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Woman in Minnesota tried ramming ICE Officer gets unalived. NSFW
Posted on 1/13/26 at 8:06 pm to Bonkers119
Posted on 1/13/26 at 8:06 pm to Bonkers119
What would your husband want?
0
Posted on 1/13/26 at 9:36 pm to dallastigers
Yall really want absolute immunity for federal agents?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 10:11 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
You're all in your feels bro.
ok retard quote:
I dont care.
So you whine about the media making up the narrative that white males are a problem, then, when given an example of that not being accurate, you tuck tail like a pussy.
This post was edited on 1/13/26 at 10:12 pm
Posted on 1/13/26 at 10:30 pm to SUB
quote:
whine about the media making up the narrative that white males are a problem,
Lol. Definitely still in your feels bro
Posted on 1/13/26 at 10:33 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
really want absolute immunity for federal agents?
I don't
But all of this would immediately calm down if local police just enforced the normal traffic laws they normally do 365 days of the year
Better yet they could identify and turn over the small percentage of the illegal aliens that have been arrested for violent crimes.
Those things are just standard operating procedures for a civil society. Just like they were under Obama and Clinton (granted Clinton was president before ICE but he didn't just deport illegal immigrants, he campaign promised he would before he did.
A lot of this crazy behavior appears to be just because it's Trump doing it. Otherwise it would have been a problem when Obama did the same
Posted on 1/13/26 at 10:39 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Yall really want absolute immunity for federal agents?
Where does the below say absolute, and any immunity they have is the same they had under Biden’s Autopen. Nothing has been increased. The states don’t have a right to stop the feds from enforcing federal law in regards to immigration. Protestors don’t have the right to obstruct or threaten or commit violence pretending they were protesting.
quote:
REMINDER. “To all ICE officers: You have federal immunity in the conduct of your duties. Anybody who lays a hand on you or tries to stop you or tries to obstruct you is committing a felony. You have immunity to perform your duties, and no one—no city official, no state official, no illegal alien, no leftist agitator or domestic insurrectionist—can prevent you from fulfilling your legal obligations and duties. The Department of Justice has made clear that if officials cross that line into obstruction, into criminal conspiracy against the United States or against ICE officers, then they will face justice.”
This post was edited on 1/13/26 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 1/13/26 at 10:41 pm to dallastigers
I was referring to Vance’s comments in the presser:
Did Vance lie again? Was he wrong? You agree this would be a bad thing, correct?
quote:
That guy is protected by absolute immunity
Did Vance lie again? Was he wrong? You agree this would be a bad thing, correct?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 10:46 pm to molsusports
Obama deported 3 million (granted a number of them were sent straight back from the border).
But nobody was following ICE around honking horns.
The media didn’t tell the sheep to care so the sheep didn’t care.
A lot of this is about Orange man bad.
But nobody was following ICE around honking horns.
The media didn’t tell the sheep to care so the sheep didn’t care.
A lot of this is about Orange man bad.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 10:53 pm to NawlinsTiger9
I don't like the discussion laid out referring to the dead woman as a terrorist but I would have to hear more before deciding if I thought Vance was lying by using the word.
With respect to the shooting I think left leaning commentators have been at least as aggressive. For example, referring to the shooting as a murder is inflammatory when it assumes no reasonable self defense. I think that's equivalent to the Vance use of the word terrorist.
I think the commonplace media use of the term kidnapping to describe the ICE actions is extremely defamatory. And dangerously inflammatory. A policeman is not kidnapping a person they arrest. An ICE agent is not kidnapping an alien they detain. Both are necessary legal actions for the normal functioning of a civil society.
With respect to the shooting I think left leaning commentators have been at least as aggressive. For example, referring to the shooting as a murder is inflammatory when it assumes no reasonable self defense. I think that's equivalent to the Vance use of the word terrorist.
I think the commonplace media use of the term kidnapping to describe the ICE actions is extremely defamatory. And dangerously inflammatory. A policeman is not kidnapping a person they arrest. An ICE agent is not kidnapping an alien they detain. Both are necessary legal actions for the normal functioning of a civil society.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 10:54 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
I was referring to Vance’s comments in the presser:
Did Vance lie again? Was he wrong? You agree this would be a bad thing, correct?
Did I post the press conference or did I post the tweet from homeland security quoting something Miller said on a new show. You asked a question in reply to my post asking did I really want something that wasn’t stated in my post. It attempted a fallacy of relevance in your reply.
Regardless I have not seen the press conference, but when you keep pulling BS like you just did I doubt how you frame anything should be taken seriously.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 10:56 pm to dallastigers
That’s a lot of words and not a lot of question answering
Typical
Typical
Posted on 1/13/26 at 10:58 pm to molsusports
quote:
I don't like the discussion laid out referring to the dead woman as a terrorist but I would have to hear more before deciding if I thought Vance was lying by using the word.
Nah, his lies were in his dozens of Twitter posts arguing about this online. He said there were no shots through the side window and that Good never waved the officers to go around her. Both verifiably false but he has not corrected his statements or taken the posts down.
quote:
With respect to the shooting I think left leaning commentators have been at least as aggressive
Some of them, sure
They aren’t the President or Vice President of the country, though
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:01 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
That’s a lot of words and not a lot of question answering Typical
Boy, You are the one bringing up something I didn’t post and acting like it was in my post until you got called out.
Then you asked if Vance lied and so on, and I clearly stated I have not seen his press conference but never trust your version or your ilk’s version of events.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:04 pm to dallastigers
quote:
You are the one bringing up something I didn’t post and acting like it was in my post until you got called out.
I just asked a question, dog.. The topic of immunity was brought up, so I asked about Vance’s declaration of absolute immunity. Doesn’t seem like that tough of a bridge to cross in regards to relevance, but fine - I’ll be more specific when addressing you in the future.
Now how about that quote? More lies from Vance or is he just wrong?
Here’s a simple one: absolute immunity - is it good or bad?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:08 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Nah, his lies were in his dozens of Twitter posts arguing about this online. He said there were no shots through the side window and that Good never waved the officers to go around her. Both verifiably false but he has not corrected his statements or taken the posts down.
I don't think those comments matter terribly much. They don't fundamentally change the shooting since she drove the vehicle into the ICE officer You also don't get to just park in the street to be a nuisance (obviously intentionally in this case but even if it weren't intentional and you're just an oblivious douche).
The terrorist comment is the more important issue because it might change the legal penalties and enforcement options. Even if Republicans are still boiling about their own being treated like terrorists for COVID or transgender issues this stuff should be resolved with the minimum necessary force. Which could be traffic citations and seizure of vehicles for repeat offenders but shouldn't be something involving our bloated homeland security, FBI, or other shadow court systems. We need to stop criminal behavior with appropriate punishment. Not equate a bunch of silly lesbians with Al Quaeda
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:11 pm to molsusports
quote:
I don't think those comments matter terribly much
The VP of the United States lying about material facts in a polarizing event always matters. Always.
quote:
We need to stop criminal behavior with appropriate punishment. Not equate a bunch of silly lesbians with Al Quaeda
Amen
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:18 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
VP of the United States lying about material facts in a polarizing event always matters. Always
Well, I would like him to correct those errors but view them as immaterial to the case
The history of fair media reporting isn't worth anything short of contempt though. Serious material and inflammatory errors were made by Biden and Obama in equally prominent cases.
Most people have badly misrepresented understandings about cases like George Floyd, Eric Garner, and Trayvon Martin. If that information had been accurately conveyed by honest presidents and media we would be in a much better place
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:22 pm to molsusports
I don’t doubt that.
I just very often hear that this administration is aiming for transparency.
When the presumed nominee for ‘28 is bickering on Twitter and getting facts wrong to the point where he is either lying or indifferent to the truth, it doesn’t paint a picture that we are in some new or enlightened age.
I just very often hear that this administration is aiming for transparency.
When the presumed nominee for ‘28 is bickering on Twitter and getting facts wrong to the point where he is either lying or indifferent to the truth, it doesn’t paint a picture that we are in some new or enlightened age.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:26 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
When the presumed nominee for ‘28 is bickering on Twitter and getting facts wrong to the point where he is either lying or indifferent to the truth, it doesn’t paint a picture that we are in some new or enlightened age.
Pick your poison
We have irresponsible rage baiting lying media on both sides. Corrupt mysteriously wealthy Senators and Congressmen for both sides.
On a case by case basis every election amounts to voting for either herpes or syphilis
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:31 pm to molsusports
Maybe so
But you still gotta call them out
Fall asleep at the wheel with these fricks and we’ll end up voting something into office that can’t be cured with penicillin
But you still gotta call them out
Fall asleep at the wheel with these fricks and we’ll end up voting something into office that can’t be cured with penicillin
Page 75 of 78
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News