- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Accused Assassin Captured in Minnesota
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:33 am to IvoryBillMatt
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:33 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
MoT, I apologize. Have you had a stroke? You think evangelical Christians who are anti-abortion and anti-trans should support Democrats????
Nobody “should” support Democrats, obviously.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:33 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Evangelical Christian
quote:Correct, not proven.
Have not proven this yet. But keep stating he is.
But that does not mean that there is several indicators pointing to just that (otherwise known as evidence). He is connected to a church and a non-profit. He considers himself a preacher and has given 'sermons'. Ordained and sanctioned is a whole other matter though. What he considers himself and being 'official' is indeed in doubt.
But as for conjecture, and it is conjecture at this point, and his motivations whether or not he was 'official' or not does not matter. All that matters is he thought that way and there's enough evidence for me, personally, to assume that he is acting like Eric Rudolph and his primary grudge is against abortion with, as what normally happens, that grudge expands into other areas around that core.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:33 am to BillyBobfan24_7
quote:
So 50% proves his theory?
You seem confused.
Poking holes in shitty theories =/= providing an alternative theory.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And that's ignoring being anti-abortion and anti-trans
PIVOT!!!
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What's a bigger number: 85 or 84?
What's a bigger number, 13 or 14?
This post was edited on 6/16/25 at 8:35 am
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:35 am to Azkiger
quote:
PIVOT!!!
Uh, no. Those 3 variables have always been the backbone.
See? No pivot. Consistently citing those 3 variables.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
None of those 3 are as self-limiting as the 3 variables of the shooter (the biggest one being Evangelical Christian).
We can go down the list if you want, you're already sitting at one strike.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Again, not true. He wasn't registered anything
quote:
I see you're getting histrionic with this one
Im just posting facts
quote:
giving up I see
Giving up on what?
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:What elements of Evangelical Christianity did he preach about in that single message?
…sermon he gave preaching Evangelical Christianity.
quote:Vance Boelter appears to have claimed that he attended Christ for the Nations Institute, a Bible college in Dallas, as part of his education that entitled him to use the title "Dr. Vance Boelter". However, it is important to note that this information comes from online sources and has not been independently verified. There is no mention of Boelter attending Lancaster Bible College or Bethel University, both of which are other notable Christian institutions.
Evangelical bible college
quote:Which leads to an archived link with no sub pages outlining the beliefs of the Revoformation (not a church but apparently a belief system he developed).
Evangelical church he created
quote:I wholeheartedly agree. You have provided absolutely no evidence.
OTHER THAN THAT, I've provided no evidence.
My hope is that you do not practice criminal law.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:39 am to SlowFlowPro
Pew research on abortion
"Conservative rep/lean rep" are the only cohort with over 50% supporting abortion being illegal in most/all cases
Here's transgender Pew data
So yeah, combine all 3 and what is the likelihood this guy is a Leftist?
Also, not, the Pew data is in terms of "Republican/Democrat" and I'm being much more specific with "Leftist"
"Conservative rep/lean rep" are the only cohort with over 50% supporting abortion being illegal in most/all cases
Here's transgender Pew data
So yeah, combine all 3 and what is the likelihood this guy is a Leftist?
Also, not, the Pew data is in terms of "Republican/Democrat" and I'm being much more specific with "Leftist"
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:40 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
My hope is that you do not practice criminal law.
He offers discount divorce and has hosting tigerdroppings radio show on his list of accomplishments.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:40 am to Azkiger
quote:
We can go down the list if you want, you're already sitting at one strike.
85 v. 84
And, again, that's party identification, which is related to but not directly addressing status as a "leftist"
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
85 v. 84
14 vs 13. There are more Evangelical Christians that are dem/lean dem than atheists that are rep/lean rep.
The fact you're not willing to conced this point proves what I've said all along. You are just a contrarian.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:43 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
What elements of Evangelical Christianity did he preach about in that single message?
Did you listen to it?
quote:
Vance Boelter appears to have claimed that he attended Christ for the Nations Institute, a Bible college in Dallas, as part of his education that entitled him to use the title "Dr. Vance Boelter". However, it is important to note that this information comes from online sources and has not been independently verified. There is no mention of Boelter attending Lancaster Bible College or Bethel University, both of which are other notable Christian institutions.
So you're arguing since he may not have attended, the fact that he is so desperate to be seen as Evangelical that he'd lie about it shows he's less likely to be Evangelical?
You may want to think about your arguments.
quote:
You have provided absolutely no evidence.
quote:
My hope is that you do not practice criminal law.
I do. Lots. Very respected in the field, actually.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:44 am to momentoftruth87
quote:And clerks for Judge Mathis.
He offers discount divorce and has hosting tigerdroppings radio show on his list of accomplishments.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:45 am to RollTide4547
Yep. Once ppl see the connections they see how fricked up he and this site is.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:45 am to Azkiger
quote:
14 vs 13. There are more Evangelical Christians that are dem/lean dem than atheists that are rep/lean rep.
Again, you're confusing the party issue with Leftism, which has been explained multiple times. It's already been said multiple times he could, theoretically, be a moderate DEM.
And I said "most limiting factor". The association with REP is more limiting than the alternative (as moderate DEMs are not Leftist)
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:47 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And I said "most limiting factor".
You also said that it was more so than atheism.
Until I looked it up and showed you they're statistically the same.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:You asserting (based upon listening to the sermon) that he was an Evangelical Christian. I am asking you to summarize your observations.
Did you listen to it?
quote:I am posting what is currently known about him. There has been no verification of his educational credentials.
So you're arguing since he may not have attended...
I see you have skipped over the church again.
As far as your criminal law practice, you seem to have difficulty in ascertaining what is evidence versus what is hearsay.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:57 am to dupergreenie
quote:
She literally cast the tie breaking vote to pass the budget.
As even you know, that isn't true, but even if it were, it doesn't establish or even suggest that was the motive for Boetler shooting her. Rep. Hortman (RIP) also had lunch the day she was shot. Was she shot BECAUSE she had lunch?
Here's an analogy. A shooter kills 30 people. Half of them are white. Half are black. You can't conclude that the shooter acted because of his hatred for black people. That theory doesn't account for the fact that 15 white people were also killed.
This post was edited on 6/16/25 at 8:59 am
Popular
Back to top


0





