Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us An Ivermectin Anecdote | Page 4 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: An Ivermectin Anecdote

Posted on 8/23/21 at 10:59 am to
Posted by SpillwayRoyalty
Member since Nov 2019
596 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 10:59 am to
Doctors are well trained on this information and understand scientific studies for medical use and how to use the incoming information, I have faith the average doctor knows more than the average TD poster on this topic.

But if you believe in a global conspiracy that is trying to hold you down I am sure you don't trust anything.
If fixing this Global Pandemic was easy it wouldn't be a global pandemic a year and a half later.
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
19013 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 11:15 am to
quote:

you do realize there is ivermectin for human use correct?


quote:

Yes. I do.


Clearly you didn't...but by all means keep showing your arse in this thread.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
15417 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Good to see you've already preemptively decided how you will react to Ivermectin studies.


Yea, look at what he said....what I was responding to.

quote:

Mechanistically, it’s fairly implausible that it works and the early reports from the trials are that the data is not promising.


After multiple studies that have already shown it to be way more effective versus a placebo than is required for FDA approval.

Did they have to have studies before the doctor prescribed Zoloft to my wife to help her quit smoking?

Did they have to have studies before the doctor kept her on it five years despite the manufacturers recommendations?

Maybe you're too stupid to see what side I'm on, maybe you'll just lay there and queef while they take your liberties.
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
19013 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 11:18 am to
quote:

I know that is for drugs in clinical trial phases but it just makes me angry that a drug as old as Ivermectin is being denied when those with clinical diagnoses of certain death can try drugs not even on the market yet.


Even worse, being completely gaslit by the FDA for some reason. muh farm animal medicine

It's very bizarre
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
25610 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 11:21 am to
quote:

I'm not jumping to conclusions, but this cat was deemed on his last days and ivermectin helped him pull it out. How the frick could the original DR not even try?


Arrogance is the stupidity of smart people.
Posted by LSU7096
Member since May 2004
2977 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 11:22 am to
Yet the original doctor needs an arse whippin and his license revoked
Posted by Dale Murphy
God's Country
Member since Feb 2005
24902 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 11:51 am to
I would try anything at that point.

However, I'm pretty sure this story is embellished.
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
16867 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

At this point, anecdotal evidence has a better track record than the CDC, FDA, WHO and the Elitists pushing the jab....just sayin'....



And a shitload of dot Indians would agree. Their hospitals were getting overrun and they used ivermectin as a prophylactic and had a huge reduction in hospital admissions.
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
89897 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 12:21 pm to
"if it saves just one life........"
Posted by shoelessjoe
Member since Jul 2006
11289 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

If someone has a week to live, wouldn’t you throw the kitchen sink at them to help them?

I’ve heard the same, people are just sitting around with no real plan of treatment.


Same thing happened with the first Covid surge last year in Texas. Dr. tried everything in a nursing home. As a last ditch effort, he prescribed Hydroxychloroquine and all of the 30 sick elderly survived. Why must we take an experimental vaccine but can’t experiment with other meds?
Posted by Lightning
Texas
Member since May 2014
3118 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

My mother’s primary physician (very good) retired and she was recommended another by friends.My mother (in her 80’s) had copd caused by Alpha 1 anti-trypsin deficiency,never smoked.The new Dr.apparently never heard of it and obviously didn’t look at her records that were transferred.New Dr. didn’t believe my mother never smoked,all but called her a liar.


Off-topic but I've never talked to anyone who had or was closely related to someone who had A1 anti-trypsin deficiency. I did some testing a few years back and found out I'm a carrier for it but don't have it myself. My doctor had never heard of it either and had to look it up to even find out what it was.

Did she know she had it before the COPD diagnosis? Just wondering if it ever affected her earlier in life.


On topic - whether ivermectin is effective against Covid or not, I don't understand the reluctance to at least try it. Low risk of side effects so what's the harm in giving it a shot for a few days? It's easy to mock people self dosing but if this medicine is so dangerous, the WHO has some explaining to do since they've been giving it out free to Africans for over 30 years.
Posted by elcid
Band Camp
Member since Mar 2007
3036 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

I know, anecdotes aren't evidence


Not so sure India would agree with that statement re Ivermectin
Posted by elcid
Band Camp
Member since Mar 2007
3036 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 12:44 pm to
Sue the living shite out of the first doctor
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

But if you believe in a global conspiracy that is trying to hold you down I am sure you don't trust anything.


Well if the people you worship weren't acting like Bond villains, perhaps there wouldn't be so much mistrust.
Posted by oogabooga68
Member since Nov 2018
27194 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

I don't understand the reluctance to at least try it. Low risk of side effects


In a sane world with honest players, there would be no reluctance.
Posted by kennypowers
AR
Member since Mar 2009
621 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Clearly you didn't...but by all means keep showing your arse in this thread.


What in my comment led you to believe I didn't know ivermectin could be consumed by humans? Its primary use is for livestock. Why is this troubling for you?
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20938 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

Yeah can't disagree with this. When I say science I'm meaning factual beyond politics that really no one who has an agenda can argue with.



Oh I agree with you as well here...that's what it SHOULD be referencing BUT between the politization of the subject as well as people's unfortunate lack of attention span, intellect, or both you are facing an uphill battle trying to break things down to someone. Especially if it goes against the media narrative.
Posted by SpillwayRoyalty
Member since Nov 2019
596 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 11:56 am to
Worship..? lol come on now.

I guess I dont see how asinine my opinion of trusting an average medical doctor over an average poster on TD or Facebook about reading medical studies and discerning how to treat patients.

Please explain oogabooga68
Posted by Jack Carter
Member since Sep 2018
12200 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 12:14 pm to
The effectiveness and safety of ivermectin is no longer based on anecdotes. It’s a proven life saver that Fauci has been trying to suppress.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram