Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Australia passes new gun laws. | Page 2 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Australia passes new gun laws.

Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:43 am to
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
32628 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:43 am to
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
75318 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:43 am to
Crime is in the hands of…criminals.
You should seek help.
Posted by RFK
Mar-a-Lago
Member since May 2012
2945 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:43 am to
I would say 5 or less.

Rifles are bolt action.

Shotguns have to be limited to 3 shells.

You can do all of the hunting you need to within these confines.

Just a recommendation.
Posted by Cito2point0
Member since Aug 2024
159 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Australia passes new gun laws.


This year was the first mass shooting in the country in like 30 years…gun deaths are like .1 per 100,000 people.

I think they are doing gun control just fine.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:45 am to
quote:

I would say 5 or less.


Oh dear god...

For dangerous game and/or home protection?
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
12818 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Common sense gun laws could have protected him.


Okay, I'll bite... Please explain to me in detail how this would have worked
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:46 am to
quote:


Shotguns have to be limited to 3 shells.



No they do not.

Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
31141 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:47 am to
They'll have more mass shooters.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
75318 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:50 am to
Your laws would not defend a mass school shooting. Easy to hide under coat four sawed off 3 shot buck shot shotguns which kills in a wide cone and kills more than one with one shot. Then three single action revolvers 18 .45 cal kill shots. You are pro over sixty dead school children. No guards armed or teachers right.

Blood is on your liberal hands. What law next?
Posted by Cito2point0
Member since Aug 2024
159 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Okay, I'll bite... Please explain to me in detail how this would have worked


If the killers in Australia had access to the same weapons we have access to the death toll would have been much higher. They were using bolt action rifles…imagine if the they had a semiautomatic rifle that held 50+rounds
Posted by RFK
Mar-a-Lago
Member since May 2012
2945 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Oh dear god... For dangerous game and/or home protection?
I’m not saying you’re not allowed to reload.

Not sure what you mean by dangerous game, but if 5 shots can’t protect you then you probably shouldn’t be out there.

This keeps mass shooters from being able to brazenly attack harmless bystanders. If the weapons they get their hands on have limited capacity, that degrades their impact.

Start with the clips. For example, anything with more than 5 bullets is illegal and can’t be manufactured. Existing ones must be turned in to be destroyed.

A peaceful society is a compromise in every respect.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28201 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:51 am to
quote:

You can do all of the hunting you need to within these confines.


Why do you keep referencing hunting? This has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment? Do you just not believe we should have a 2nd amendment?
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
108390 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:51 am to
Would be a damn shame if 5 criminals entered your home with the intent to do you harm, and all you had to protect yourself was a shotgun with 3 shells. This shotgun was of course locked in a gun safe with the shells being kept in a different room for safety.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:55 am to
quote:


Not sure what you mean by dangerous game, but if 5 shots can’t protect you


Against thick skinned dangerous game, good chance you'll need more than 5.

Happens frequently with backup handguns and bears. You can thank the govt for letting you die after youve expended 5 and the bear is still eating you

Posted by Stealth Matrix
29°59'55.98"N 90°05'21.85"W
Member since Aug 2019
11410 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:55 am to
Laws will surely stop criminals from getting what they want now, since everyone knows criminals obey the law.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
75318 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:56 am to
How does this stop brazen mass shootings?
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
37877 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:56 am to
Covid camps

Even more restrictive gun laws

What a terrible place
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
64149 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:57 am to
quote:

restricting ownership to Australian citizens


This is the only part that seems reasonable.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
64149 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 9:58 am to
quote:

I would say 5 or less.

Rifles are bolt action.

Shotguns have to be limited to 3 shells.

You can do all of the hunting you need to within these confines.

Just a recommendation.


This is ridiculous and brain dead.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
110284 posts
Posted on 12/28/25 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Against thick skinned dangerous game, good chance you'll need more than 5.

Happens frequently with backup handguns and bears. You can thank the govt for letting you die after youve expended 5 and the bear is still eating you


I wonder which areas of his life there are in which that poster would be happy with me making the determination of his needs.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram