- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
admin is certainly trying to act without any oversight or review.
Because the Supreme Court has ruled in the past that removals by a president using the enemy aliens act are not subject to judicial review.
The judge overstepped his bounds and authority
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:15 am to antibarner
Mark Levin nailed this 20 years ago, he was focused on SCOTUS at the time but it's pervasive throughout the legal (not justice) system
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:19 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Emotions are high this morning
Eh. you're always weeping over something. We're used to it.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:24 am to SlowFlowPro
You truly are a hypocrite in regards to your comments about the Biden and Trump administrations.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
As a discount divorce lawyer, you are overstepping
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We do not know that. Read the link. What little we know indicates some of those included have flimsy, if any, evidence to make the allegations. Now the Trump admin is arguing any further inquiry is "national security" See the issue?
So if it was confirmed they are all here illegally, i am assuming there would be no exception to the deportation?
If not, please explain. What extra “due process” would be needed, especially since you keep saying you want small government. And i am assuming you took great exception to no “due process” or “oversight” taking place for the illegals Biden brought here illegally on planes to begin with?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:33 am to SlowFlowPro
They are absolutely involved with gangs or cartels. You all act like ICE and local law enforcement do not know who these people are. Law enforcement from multiple countries know who these people are. They have rap sheets a mile long. Tom Homan was just on Stephen A. Smith podcast talking about this and about how legacy media were straight out lying to the people. They plan these raids and know exactly who they are picking up and what they are being picked up for. They know what groups they are apart of and they know what they are wanted for in other countries. Like Homan said, if sanctuary cities would let them come pick them up from the jails, instead of releasing them back into the public. Then they wouldn't have to risk the lives of the law enforcement officers and public trying to get them. I hope they deport them all. Even the ones not in gangs, their parents and their children. If you are here illegally....bye.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:34 am to BCreed1
frick a judge. If anything, they need more checks on their power. They do shite with impunity from the local level on up.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:36 am to SlowFlowPro
She defined where oversight lies and the Judicial Branch stepped outside of their lane according to her statement.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:37 am to SlowFlowPro
You’ve been extra busy running cover for libs today. Business slow?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:these aren't citizens, they have no legal right to be here and they are committing acts of terrorism against citizens. They are part of a designated terrorist organization. Their removal had no judicial system component, as illegal immigrant terrorists don't have the rights a citizen does. Therefore it's not even close to the straw man situation you put further. The answer is simply that a citizen would have the right to a hearing, whereas foreign terrorists don't. This falls solely under the purview of the executive branch powers and rando district court judges trying to dictate to the executive branch in national security matters is a violation of separation of powers. There, don't you feel better?
If we have no judicial oversight/recourse, what happens when a citizen is labeled a "terrorist" and then put on a plane in the middle of the night and shipped off to a Central American jail? Do they just have to grin and bear it?
Edit: I've never met anyone associated with the judicial profession that doesn't think the judicial system is the real ultimate authority with unlimited powe rather than being 1 of 3 co-equal branches of government
This post was edited on 3/19/25 at 11:43 am
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:42 am to Dandy Lion
quote:
quote:
That's a laughably weak argument. Cerna is arguing that the Trump administration has the power to deport any ILLEGAL immigrant suspected of having ties to the Tren de Aragua gang, even if the evidence is thin and never proven in any court
Ties to tren de agua or not, WGAF? THEYRE CRIMINALLY TRESPASSING.
You think you, as a US citizen, show up in some bumfrick country without a visa, and upon being detained, you expect to get a trial which may determine you can stay? On what basis? GTFO (and GTFO).
Wait... What?? A person here illegally can be deported, regardless if they are affiliated with a gang.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The admin is certainly trying to act without any oversight or review.
this issue has already been ruled on by the supreme court. it's settled.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 11:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Sure.
I don't think this is one of them.
So, are you suggesting there is a legal guideline showing what decisions the President can make that allow judicial 'oversight and review'?
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The admin is certainly trying to act without any oversight or review.
Quite the contrary, it is the court that is acting with no oversight.
AG Bondi is arguing against the same premise you persist. You want to argue the merits of the legality of something, you have no right to even bring before your court in the first place.
Lets start there before we start with the nonsense.
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:00 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
really really weak
About as strong as his "legal" career
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The admin is certainly trying to act without any oversight or review
wrong and for the first time....go frick yourself...this is completely wrong
Posted on 3/19/25 at 12:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
If the judiciary runs foreign relations and national security we’re screwed
Page 6 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News