- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Boston 2024 Election turnout
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:43 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Typically, people are just reading the charts wrong and misrepresenting the data.
I did a google search and found this story
quote:
Boston officials blamed a “miscalculation” for multiple polling locations running out of ballots Tuesday, an issue that prompted Massachusetts' top elections official to consider a temporary state takeover of the city’s elections division.
At voting sites in multiple Boston neighborhoods, ballots ran short and election workers were unable to reach City Hall to request more, officials said. As voters waited, Secretary of State William Galvin’s office instructed city officials to have police rush additional ballots to the polls with their blue lights flashing and sirens blaring.
Yes that absolutely explains >100 turnout or even more than 200% in some districts. From the info. you just shared i am now convinced everything was legit.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:44 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Typically followed with the "it's funny how this only happens one way" lines, which, turns out, aren't true.
How do you know they aren’t true?
Because the alleged cheaters said so?
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:45 am to Warboo
quote:
Yes that absolutely explains >100 turnout
Can you not read?
quote:
That isn't likely an explanation of the problem
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:45 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
How do you know they aren’t true?
I literally just posted an example of that situation happening in a blue/DEM aera, with the story I linked
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:48 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
Typically followed with the "it's funny how this only happens one way" lines, which, turns out, aren't true.
How do you know they aren’t true?
Because the alleged cheaters said so?
I have seen SFP make some legitimate arguments on issues in the past. I have also seen him go full retard in arguments also. The argument he is making here will firmly be filed in the full retard category.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:48 am to Warboo
quote:
The argument he is making here will firmly be filed in the full retard category.
That there is no reason to cheat in super blue areas?
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That there is no reason to cheat in super blue areas?
If there is no reason to cheat then why did they? The numbers show fraud period.
This post was edited on 11/23/24 at 7:51 am
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:51 am to Warboo
quote:
If there is no reason to cheat then why did they?
That's exactly the problem with the argument that they cheated.
It makes no sense to cheat in a super blue area. That's the whole point of my argument.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It makes no sense to cheat in a super blue area. That's the whole point of my argument.
The whole part of my argument is "then why did they". It is obvious that there is fraud. I do not care whether they needed to cheat or not cheat. The numbers suggest that they did.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:58 am to SlowFlowPro
So you don't think it is important to them to win the popular vote or down ballot voting?
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:59 am to trinidadtiger
I’ve seen people post this in the past with cities. I believe cheating occurs in lots of big cities in our country, but is there any alternative possibility to these discrepancies? Not sure of MA law, but are they allowing same day voter registration maybe? Even then no way they can explain over 200% turnout in a precinct.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:03 am to Warboo
quote:
I do not care whether they needed to cheat or not cheat.
You should, especially if there isn't clear data to come down one way or the other.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:05 am to Crimsonians
quote:
So you don't think it is important to them to win the popular vote or down ballot voting?
In states like Mass. and Maryland there is only one major city. It is much easier to commit fraud without being caught in urban areas. If you are going to manipulate a election in those two states it would have to be done in Boston and Baltimore respectively. The down ballot races are super important in those cities as far as keeping control of courts, voting, etc.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:10 am to Crimsonians
quote:
So you don't think it is important to them to win the popular vote or down ballot voting?
The DEMs biggest losses were in super blue areas (including areas like Mass)
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:12 am to Warboo
quote:
In states like Mass. and Maryland there is only one major city. It is much easier to commit fraud without being caught in urban areas.
2024 voting by county
Mass is not a good example for this. It's possibly the most DEM/blue state in the US.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:15 am to SlowFlowPro
The takeaway to me is that they CAN and DO cheat in big blue cities. That is what makes it plausible that they cheated in the blue counties that mattered most in 2020. Atlanta, Milwaukee, Detroit and Philly - wherever the vote counting stopped late night/early AM.
There is evidence all over the place of shadiness in the 2024 election, both in the presidential race and down ballot. The difference this year being that it was identified and then shut down. PA being the glaring example with the woman who bragged about counting illegal votes.
There is evidence all over the place of shadiness in the 2024 election, both in the presidential race and down ballot. The difference this year being that it was identified and then shut down. PA being the glaring example with the woman who bragged about counting illegal votes.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:19 am to kbro
quote:
The takeaway to me is that they CAN and DO cheat in big blue cities. That is what makes it plausible that they cheated in the blue counties that mattered most in 2020.
This is the scenario you're proposing.
In 2020, they cheated EVERYWHERE to win.
In 2024, they only cheated in the areas that were most closely scrutinized, and in the areas where nobody was watching, they decided not to cheat.
Explain to me how that strategy makes sense.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:25 am to SlowFlowPro
No
I’m saying that they cheated in the places they needed to cheat to win in 2020. With mail in ballots they dumped strategically in the swing states.
In 2024 I’m not saying the D’s attempted to cheat to win the presidential election. But there is evidence that shady things are happening, proving. That it’s possible to cheat in many places
In 2020 there was motive, opportunity and enough evidence to convince me that 2020 was stolen.
I’m saying that they cheated in the places they needed to cheat to win in 2020. With mail in ballots they dumped strategically in the swing states.
In 2024 I’m not saying the D’s attempted to cheat to win the presidential election. But there is evidence that shady things are happening, proving. That it’s possible to cheat in many places
In 2020 there was motive, opportunity and enough evidence to convince me that 2020 was stolen.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:26 am to John Barron
Illegals or college kids
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
slo pro,
Two pages of "ha ha hee hee" why would they need to cheat in a blue state you peasants.
Yet you still havent offered a simple answer why there would be so many votes over registered voters.
Its fraud, there is no other answer.
Two pages of "ha ha hee hee" why would they need to cheat in a blue state you peasants.
Yet you still havent offered a simple answer why there would be so many votes over registered voters.
Its fraud, there is no other answer.
Popular
Back to top


1





