- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: “But they assaulted police officers”
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:08 am to SouthEasternKaiju
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:08 am to SouthEasternKaiju
I’d like to see a thoughtful examination of not only police response, but federal undercover behavior.
The Ray Epps case sticks out like dog balls. An obvious agitator who was not pursued by law enforcement, while hundreds of people who did nothing but show up were charged. The capitol bomber narrative is another that reeks of federal involvement.
The Ray Epps case sticks out like dog balls. An obvious agitator who was not pursued by law enforcement, while hundreds of people who did nothing but show up were charged. The capitol bomber narrative is another that reeks of federal involvement.
1
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:12 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
Trump handed out that only 130 were convicted of assaulting police officers
Ok and they did 4 years in prison. Rapists in DC get less time. I’d say they did enough time.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:15 am to HonoraryCoonass
At least 70 commutations being reported.
NBC News
Here’s a good article on how the DOJ leveraged law to make non violent acts into assaults.
LINK
NBC News
Here’s a good article on how the DOJ leveraged law to make non violent acts into assaults.
quote:
While the least likely to receive pardons might be those who personally assaulted police officers—especially those whose assaults were caught on videotape—not all of the 608 arrests for crimes against police officers necessarily involved “assaults.” In many contexts, the Justice Department statisticians group together two different felony charges relating to police officers. The first, known as “assaulting, resisting, or impeding”
quote:
Some of these 608 defendants, however, were charged with a different category of felony, which Trump might not consider “violent.” These offenders were charged with “obstruct[ing], imped[ing], or interfer[ing]” with police officers during a civil disorder
LINK
This post was edited on 1/25/25 at 10:22 am
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:17 am to thebigmuffaletta
The DC court is a corrupt tool of the Deep State and its minions in the DNC, the DC swamp, and MSM. I doubt any of the J6 convicts got anything approaching a fair investigation and trial in that cesspool.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:17 am to thebigmuffaletta
Ashli was shot and killed, and Biden pardoned the shooter!!!!!!!!!
The DEMS will always have the Biden Admin hanging over their heads!
The DEMS will always have the Biden Admin hanging over their heads!
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:20 am to thebigmuffaletta
How many were assaulted during the summer of love?
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:23 am to thebigmuffaletta
quote:
This seems like a very small number compared to the numbers of violent criminals
Are you implying here that illegal immigrants are not arrested when they commit a violent crime?
Or that illegal immigrants are, by their nature, violent criminals?
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:24 am to oldskule
She was unarmed and gunned down through a locked door from a different room.
How that is considered justifiably use of deadly force is beyond explanation
How that is considered justifiably use of deadly force is beyond explanation
This post was edited on 1/25/25 at 10:24 am
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:24 am to thebigmuffaletta
I’m pretty curious why he pardoned all of them instead of just the non violent “offenders”.
Even JDV came out against the violent ones getting pardoned.
Even JDV came out against the violent ones getting pardoned.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:25 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
She was unarmed and gunned down through a locked door from a different room.
How that is considered justifiably use of deadly force is beyond explanation
Did you watch the video?
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:26 am to LSUconvert
Yes
Here’s a link.
LINK
Unarmed
Locked door
From a different room
Here’s a link.
LINK
Unarmed
Locked door
From a different room
This post was edited on 1/25/25 at 10:28 am
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:26 am to thebigmuffaletta
Meh..... People need to get the frick over it. To the winner go the spoils. The Marxist have no room to cast judgement and they took every advantage of their time in power. Geez, look at Biden's pardons! Progressive pussies need to realize, their feelings don't matter and neither do their opinions. America has spoken.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:28 am to thebigmuffaletta
Dems love cops now.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:29 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
... people who did nothing but show up were charged
I think the proud boys guy Enrique Tarrio (sp?) didn't even show up. He was miles away. Still got like 20 years.
I think Proud Boys are silly Larpers, but Larping isn't a crime. Let alone 20 years.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:29 am to Vacherie Saint
Hypothetical here, but pretend that door is the door to your domicile.
Do you shoot that democrat if they're acting like she was? Because here in Mississippi that'd be a dead democrat. Interested to hear your take on it.
Do you shoot that democrat if they're acting like she was? Because here in Mississippi that'd be a dead democrat. Interested to hear your take on it.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:29 am to LSUconvert
Scores of violent illegals get arrested and released, if that’s the persnickety distinction you are looking for.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:31 am to LSUconvert
Why pretend?
You have the act in full view right before you.
You have the act in full view right before you.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:33 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Why pretend?
You have the act in full view right before you.
Well to answer my hypothetical you'd need to pretend...
Because that door is obviously not the door to your domicile. Answering a hypothetical question requires some amount of pretending
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:34 am to thebigmuffaletta
Trump should have DOJ pulled the data to see how many BLM cases were prosecuted, how many were dropped, and how many got off with reduced/ lite sentences. I bet it’s ridiculous
Posted on 1/25/25 at 10:36 am to LSUconvert
It’s not the door to anyone’s domicile. There’s no need for hypotheticals. We know exactly what happened cause, you know, it’s on video.
He accepted his pardon almost certainly because an argument that he felt his life was endanger would fail. Why? Because there were other, more violent, and armed men trying to break down that door. One, much closer to him, smashing away with what appears to be a wooden club. Yet he kills the unarmed female.
He accepted his pardon almost certainly because an argument that he felt his life was endanger would fail. Why? Because there were other, more violent, and armed men trying to break down that door. One, much closer to him, smashing away with what appears to be a wooden club. Yet he kills the unarmed female.
This post was edited on 1/25/25 at 10:38 am
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News