- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CA Prop 50 projected to pass
Posted on 11/4/25 at 10:53 pm to Indefatigable
Posted on 11/4/25 at 10:53 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I find it hilarious that you minimize the significance of a seat in those states, but claim that the GOP could easily outdo them by reclaiming a single seat in like 6 states in the south
Yes, gaining 1-2 seats in each southern state would completely negate everything the Dems can do outside of California. If Louisiana wins its case before SCOTUS, it would be devastating for Dems, but that isn't necessary. The GOP will win this fight even without that case.
ETA: This article is a good breakdown, and is even more favorable to Dems because he's wrong about Utah. LINK
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 10:54 pm
1
Posted on 11/4/25 at 10:53 pm to Indefatigable
Not hard at all. I have actually experienced hardship in life. You are a sniveling pussy and you know it.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 10:55 pm to Luke
Newsom speaking
Posted on 11/4/25 at 10:56 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Yes, gaining 1-2 seats in each southern state would completely negate everything the Dems can do outside of California. If Louisiana wins its case before SCOTUS, it would be devastating for Dems, but that isn't necessary. The GOP will win this fight even without that case.
I just don’t think you’ve sat down and done the math on each state. The difference in what could be done is negligible. Handful of seats at best.
That’s not some major victory. It’s something that’s easily undone two years later when the next election occurs with lots of dollars and specifically chosen candidates.
A five seat majority in the House doesn’t do anything for anyone long term.
ETA: I don’t need an article to explain it. I’ve literally done the work myself on squeezing districts within current constitutional parameters. It’s just not the overall game changer you’re wanting it to be, and that’s with today’s politics. These things change constantly. Should we go through this every two years now? Just redrawing lines every election?
It’s already the biggest flaw in our constitution that House elections are every two years and now we want to move the playing field to make sure permanent gridlock is entrenched? I just don’t understand the perspective.
It’s time to overhaul the process entirely, make it geographically centered, and let the chips fall where they may.
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 10:59 pm
Posted on 11/4/25 at 10:56 pm to RLDSC FAN
No excuses from you ppl anymore about all the issues in CA
Everything is the Ds fault
Everything is the Ds fault
Posted on 11/4/25 at 10:56 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
It’s such a stupid spiral. It’s time for districting reform to end this stupid shite. Population, geography, existing administrative and municipal boundaries—period. Zero other factors.
Your problem is thinking the democrats would do this. They would never.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:02 pm to DemonKA3268
Three responses on one post, two on another.
If you don’t stop typing, there aren’t enough energy drinks on the planet that’ll get you to the plant on time in the morning, partner.
If you don’t stop typing, there aren’t enough energy drinks on the planet that’ll get you to the plant on time in the morning, partner.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:04 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Three responses on one post, two on another. If you don’t stop typing, there aren’t enough energy drinks on the planet that’ll get you to the plant on time in the morning, partner.
Lol, that’s all you got? Don’t work at a plant. Want to prove your ignorance, again?
fricking pussy
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:04 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Your problem is thinking the democrats would do this. They would never.
Correct. It’ll have to be SCOTUS that does it.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:05 pm to DemonKA3268
I’m just waiting on you to say something relevant to the thread. Until then, since you aren’t at the plant, I’ll use job site instead. Long day tomorrow either way.
Was it meth that brought the hard times to your trailer?
Was it meth that brought the hard times to your trailer?
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 11:07 pm
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:07 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I’m just waiting on you to say something relevant to the thread. Until then, since you aren’t at the plant, I’ll use job site instead. Long day tomorrow either way.
Not for me but keep trying. You should be a comedian but you would suck at that too…
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:11 pm to Indefatigable
When will you realize nothing you say or do matters? Oops, second comment. I should be purged…
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:12 pm to Indefatigable
It’s easy to imagine a scenario where Wisconsin for example redraws their map to crack up the city into 6-7 R+5 districts only to completely shite themselves next year and end up going from a 6-2 R majority to splitting or even becoming minority. Try to gain one seat and end up losing 4. Stupid games stupid prizes.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:16 pm to DemonKA3268
quote:
When will you realize nothing you say or do matters?
You’re on a message board. If you don’t think it should exist, don’t frequent it. Seems pretty simple.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:17 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Was it meth that brought the hard times to your trailer?
Nice edit. No, never have done illegal drugs, ever. Keep trying though. I actually did real shite in my life unlike you.
Edit away pussy…
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:17 pm to DaveyJones12
quote:
It’s easy to imagine a scenario where Wisconsin for example redraws their map to crack up the city into 6-7 R+5 districts only to completely shite themselves next year and end up going from a 6-2 R majority to splitting or even becoming minority. Try to gain one seat and end up losing 4. Stupid games stupid prizes.
No it isn’t, because Wisconsin is way too divided for something like that. It wouldn’t get through. Only partisan states are able to do this.
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:18 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
You’re on a message board. If you don’t think it should exist, don’t frequent it. Seems pretty simple.
A message board that lets people commiserate and nothing changes.
Basically a bitch board. Anyway, back to real life. The sun will rise in the morning…
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:19 pm to Indefatigable
Of course it should exist, how else would we identify the pussies…
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 11:24 pm
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:20 pm to Indefatigable
Damn, 3rd time. I must be flogged…
Posted on 11/4/25 at 11:21 pm to Indefatigable
shite, 4th time…
Whatever will we do?
Whatever will we do?
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News