- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Candice Owens is a straight up lunatic.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 9:52 am to m2pro
Posted on 10/25/25 at 9:52 am to m2pro
quote:
I am stating my opinion because I have learned that for far too long every country (the people) on earth is afraid to think independent of the collective. I have grown fully weary of any measure of trust with anyone feeding me information about anything in the political spectrum, or with regards to history or religion.
I believe few wish to control the many of us.
I have changed so much with my world view and my views of the spiritual or metaphysical since my 20s it is unreal. I am not a Candace apologist, nor fan boy. I simply find her arguments compelling about this.
Excellent comments. Bears repeating.
The Overlords always use the MockingBirdMSM media and controlled-opp media to push for a swift consensus BEFORE deliberate and objective analyses can be determined. This included "blackwashing" those who dare question the "offiial story" as "kooks" and "insane".
0
Posted on 10/25/25 at 9:54 am to Snipe
quote:
What an evil person she [Candice Owens] has become.
What specifically makes Candice Owns an "evil person"?
Posted on 10/25/25 at 9:56 am to EphesianArmor
Her saying Trump was part of the Charlie Kirk assassination is pretty evil. You disagree?
This post was edited on 10/25/25 at 10:00 am
Posted on 10/25/25 at 9:58 am to m2pro
quote:
There is very reasonable smoke coming from Israel's way.
I haven't noticed that at all.
Neither has anyone noticed the smoke and heat drifting straight at Tucker, Thomas Massie, MTG etal.
*cough*
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:00 am to BBONDS25
quote:
He saying Trump was part of the Charlie Kirk assassination is pretty evil. You disagree?
I entirely reject your premise and claim.
That said, go ahead make your case for "evil" based on facts and not innuendo.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:08 am to 3down10
quote:
.....your inability to see and/or accept this reality highlights the reason why you want to cancel people who don't share your opinions.
Funny enough, the whole calling someone a conspiracy theorist was invented by the CIA to cover up real ones.
Well I got one for you.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:25 am to EphesianArmor
Her claiming that the Trump administration colluded with TPUSA and Erika Kirk to kill Charlie Kirk.
Specifically.
Specifically.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:25 am to Penrod
quote:
his is the diagram of the columns that were destroyed by the initial impact. That is extreme. The remaining columns would have supported the structure had it not been for the fire. ANY fire weakens steel. At about 400 degrees F steel is weakening. At about 1,100 degrees F steel has lost half its strength (depends on the steel). My BBQ pit heats to over 600 degrees F sometimes.
The remaining columns were way overstressed, the fire weakened the others, and failure resulted. Pointy hat conspiracists will always believe something else.
Those are not support beams, they are merely cosmetic. Who are you trying to bullshite?
The WTC's had an inner support column structure.
During construction, you could even see them as the rest of the building was mostly empty.
The buildings were also designed to absorb the impact of such planes.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:25 am to Snipe
Charlatan defined. Ignore her.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:26 am to Snipe
quote:
Her claiming that the Trump administration colluded with TPUSA and Erika Kirk to kill Charlie Kirk.
Specifically.
Link or source of quote?
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:27 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
Link or source of quote?
Before I link it. I just want to be clear. You were ignorant to the fact she made those remarks. Correct?
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:29 am to 3down10
quote:
The buildings were also designed to absorb the impact of such planes.
absorb the impact of a fully loaded commercial airliner? Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:33 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
You got these two 100% right.
The others? Eh.
This picture proves the earth is round. It can not happen on a flat earth. It requires the sun to be at an angle that is under the clouds to light up the bottoms of them.
Unless you believe the entire world has day and night at the same time, then and only then could the sun go below the plane of the earth in order to cause this. Of course, we know that's not true.
In 1969 it would have been more difficult to fake the moon landing than to actually go to the moon. We didn't have CGI like we do now, but we had more than enough rocket technology from WW2 and the Cold War to shoot a rocket up there.
It was tracked by people around the world.
These things are a waste of time and only exist to discredit people.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:33 am to Snipe
I’d rather look at and listen to Candace Owens than Jasmine Crockett, but she has gotten a little bazaar since her really good podcasts prior to the presidential election. She really helped Trump get elected, as did many other black conservatives who have figured out that democrats don’t give two shits about them.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:35 am to BBONDS25
quote:
absorb the impact of a fully loaded commercial airliner?
Yes. Specifically a Boeing 707 traveling at speeds of 600mph.
They were also designed to withstand the fires that would result from such an impact.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:37 am to 3down10
quote:
The WTC's had an inner support column structure.
---
The buildings were also designed to absorb the impact of such planes.
Absolute fact.
That we were all led to believe a flimsy aluminum skin of a plane could crash through those robust steel columns, melt entirely[/i] into the building (no plane parts or wings falling off), THEN emerge through to the other side was impossible.
This post was edited on 10/25/25 at 10:50 am
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:41 am to 3down10
Sorry, brutha. I can't agree with you on either.
I can expound on the actual cosmology, science and valid theories that take the opposite views, but maybe another time.
You crushed it on the 911 impossibility and on other issues that go against the grain.
I can expound on the actual cosmology, science and valid theories that take the opposite views, but maybe another time.
You crushed it on the 911 impossibility and on other issues that go against the grain.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:43 am to Snipe
a woman is bat shite crazy pics @ 9?
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:43 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Before I link it.
Don't talk, just shoot.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:48 am to BBONDS25
quote:
As soon as aluminum jets hit that super-reinforced steel column core, they hit a literal wall.
So how in the world do you suppose an aluminum plane (whose hulls BIRDS DENT) supposedly crashed through a WTC building inner-steel columns -- with its nose emerging to the other side?
Page 6 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News