Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us User Profile: BBONDS25 | TigerDroppings.com
Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:57871
Registered on:3/11/2008
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

The right to peacefully observe government employees in the performance of their duties has been well established for a long time in this country. It’s crazy how may of you no longer support our Constitution.


Your knowledge of the constitution is laughable. And your description of what is happening is insane. You have to be a complete moron to support the attacks on ice.
quote:

And you get downvoted by the petulant MAGA fools here for stating the facts.


:lol: oh my. Keep reading. :popcorn:
quote:

Given this is a treaty, don’t more than Trump have to agree to pull out?


Not generally.
quote:

You really think this shitshow serves American interests? You can't be that clueless and able to use a keyboard...


You are ignorant ti the value of Greenland? Yeesh.
quote:

Some of the posters here are so unaware and ill-informed


:lol: oh my. Your lack of self-awareness is staggering.
quote:

Oh, got it. We have a dozen guys working a radar installation. Is that presence supposed to be inducing us to engage in Israel’s proxy wars? Note the thread is talking about Europe, which had no part to play in any of our proxy wars over the past two decades.


:lol: move those goalposts. How many times do you have to get caught being completely ignorant in one thread?
quote:

What specific interests are we there to protect?


He wants to spend 800MM annually to protect our embassies.
quote:

Trump ran on this

:lol:

quote:

He's exactly like Obama.

:lol:
quote:

MASSIE: “I vote with Republicans 91% of the time, and the 9% I don’t, they're taking up for pedophiles, starting another war or bankrupting our country.”


Or being the deciding vote siding with democrats to raise the debt ceiling when Biden was president.
quote:

Is there any indication that they're trying to avoid the chaos?


Of course. They request that these sanctuary cities don’t ignore ICE detainers. You have the chaos creators backwards.
quote:

Grok or chatGPT?


NOW you want links? Make up your mind.

Which would be better in your opinion?
quote:

Gift is subjective. But sure, it’s free money.


:lol: not quite as definitive as it should be, but close enough.

Now….

quote:

the U.S. effectively subsidizes other NATO countries' military capabilities through its disproportionately large defense spending, contributing significantly more than its share of the alliance's total budget and GDP, funding shared NATO functions, and maintaining a large U.S. military presence in Europe, which benefits allies by enhancing collective security and interoperability, though some argue it encourages allies to underinvest in their own defense.


Glad we could clear that up. :cheers:
quote:

And when Congress requires approval before withdrawal?


Good lord. That’s his entire point. They may not have that power. How is this going so far over your head?
quote:

This coming from a guy who doesn’t understand the difference between lease payments and subsidies.


:lol: is a subsidy a gift. I’ve asked three times. Once you answer that we can explore if the us is subsidizing other countries.
quote:

Don’t paste a link. Argue for yourself. Anyone can google something and find law professors willing to argue any given side of any issue.


You ask me for links. Then complain when they don’t say what you like. :lol: Just take your L.
quote:

As to impeachment, would be very difficult to justify given Washington, Jefferson, Carter, Reagan, both Bushes, and Trump twice have all done it unilaterally.



:lol: beautiful.
quote:

Yes. It is against traditional legal theory that POTUS can withdraw.


:lol: didn’t read the first paragraph of the link, did you? Even fricking Yale law review concedes the traditional legal scholars say the President can. You opine with such hubris from a place of complete ignorance.
quote:

an erosion of general legal and constitutional interpretation


This is just false. Man. You speak so definitively without having much actual knowledge.
quote:

But holding that POTUS can unilaterally withdraw from a treaty that required Senate approval to enter into does not make sense. It renders Senate approval meaningless, that’s not something courts tend to sign on for. It effectively voids the requirement.


You agree with the Yale law review which is at odds with the traditional legal scholars take.
quote:

no. Source? What you’re suggesting would render the Senate approval requirement farcical/meaningless, which is pretty much a no-go in legal interpretation.



LINK
Yale law review is arguing against thetraditional legal theory that the President can unilaterally withdraw.