- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Definitive #Obamagate Timeline (8PM 3/17 Update)
Posted on 3/7/17 at 1:48 am to joshnorris14
Posted on 3/7/17 at 1:48 am to joshnorris14
quote:
joshnorris14
Hey, not sure if you wanna add this... it's Oct 2016 where Obama told Trump to stop whining about voter fraud. If there was not voter fraud, then Russia couldn't have been hacking the election, right? Not sure if significant but here:
LINK
0
Posted on 3/7/17 at 6:20 am to Mephistopheles
Obama wanted a legacy. Looks like he may be in for one - just not the one he expected...
This post was edited on 3/7/17 at 6:24 am
Posted on 3/7/17 at 7:59 am to reo45
quote:
I have a cousin that works in intelligence himself at Fort-Meade.
Intelligence analysts are fed what to look at/for...
If his boss says Russians, he will look for Russians...
If it is Boka Haram...Boka haram...
Not to say we ever could trust the filthy Russians as far as we could throw them, though...
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:22 am to joshnorris14
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/5/20 at 7:54 am
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:46 am to joshnorris14
Should I add Wikileaks revelation that the CIA has the technology to make hacking attempts appear to originate from Russia?
Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:58 am to joshnorris14
quote:
Should I add Wikileaks revelation that the CIA has the technology to make hacking attempts appear to originate from Russia?
You're a little out of your league on this one.Posted on 3/7/17 at 9:59 am to Foy
quote:
You're a little out of your league on this one.
Not an argument.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 10:03 am to joshnorris14
quote:
Not an argument.
Well you got that right!
Posted on 3/7/17 at 12:02 pm to joshnorris14
Any update this morning?
Posted on 3/7/17 at 12:16 pm to LosLobos111
quote:Yes. Trump can still end this anytime he wants.
Any update this morning?
Posted on 3/7/17 at 12:32 pm to LosLobos111
quote:
Any update this morning?
Nope, Trump still hasn't released any proof, I think they are hoping the building shitstorm over Trumpcare will make people forget about his delusional allegations.
You know like how he doesn't talk about investigating "voter fraud" anymore or a half dozen other examples of batshit nonsense he spouted then said he'd investigate then quietly dropped when people quit paying attention.
This post was edited on 3/7/17 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 3/7/17 at 1:40 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Obama wanted a legacy. Looks like he may be in for one - just not the one he expected...
This isn't true, remember he told us that his Administration was the most transparent ever and had ZERO scandals. ZERO
Posted on 3/7/17 at 2:39 pm to joshnorris14
So when do they plan to show/prove Obama ever wiretapped Trump? The whole list of articles you posted center around Obamagate yet not one of them proves Obama wiretapped Trump for political gain.
Shouldn't we also be questioning how Trump got the information?
The reports from various newspaper publications don't mention wire taps or that any of this was motivated from a political stand point. So if Trump's allegations are correct wouldn't he have leaked classified info provided to him from the intelligence community? If it didn't come from an official report he read then who would be his source for the allegations? Who told Trump about these wire taps?
It's a pretty heavy accusation to then not provide evidence to. The white house said it got the info from news outlets that already reported it, but i haven't found any news outlets which provided evidence to this claim or even said that this was the case. It's all very weird that the president is calling out a former president for wire tapping him without providing any sort of real intelligence information to back it up. Only time will tell if he is full of shite or not.
On that note, will the Obamagate chasers actually accept the verdict if they don't agree with it? Or will this turn in to another birther bullshite claim that Trump gets everyone talking about without providing any real proof?
Shouldn't we also be questioning how Trump got the information?
The reports from various newspaper publications don't mention wire taps or that any of this was motivated from a political stand point. So if Trump's allegations are correct wouldn't he have leaked classified info provided to him from the intelligence community? If it didn't come from an official report he read then who would be his source for the allegations? Who told Trump about these wire taps?
It's a pretty heavy accusation to then not provide evidence to. The white house said it got the info from news outlets that already reported it, but i haven't found any news outlets which provided evidence to this claim or even said that this was the case. It's all very weird that the president is calling out a former president for wire tapping him without providing any sort of real intelligence information to back it up. Only time will tell if he is full of shite or not.
On that note, will the Obamagate chasers actually accept the verdict if they don't agree with it? Or will this turn in to another birther bullshite claim that Trump gets everyone talking about without providing any real proof?
Posted on 3/7/17 at 3:07 pm to Tiger Tracker
quote:
So when do they plan to show/prove Obama ever wiretapped Trump?
The House Intelligence Committee has agreed to investigate the matter
Posted on 3/7/17 at 3:12 pm to montanagator
quote:
Nope, Trump still hasn't released any proof, I think they are hoping the building shitstorm over Trumpcare will make people forget about his delusional allegations.
You know like how he doesn't talk about investigating "voter fraud" anymore or a halfndozen other examples of batshit nonsense he spouted then said he'd investigate then quietly dropped when people quit paying attention.
I think part of Trump's strategy is to have so many shite storms going at the same time that it becomes impossible to focus on any given issue to the point of being held accountable for any outlandish statements. The current news cycle is such that Trump's tweet accusing Obama of wiretapping Trump Tower could be old and irrelevant after just a few days.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 3:34 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
The House Intelligence Committee has agreed to investigate the matter
Nunes also said he see's no evidence of Trump's allegations.
Basically the committee is going to drag this oit long enough for people to forget about then drop it.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 3:37 pm to little billy
quote:
I think part of Trump's strategy is to have so many shite storms going at the same time that it becomes impossible to focus on any given issue to the point of being held accountable for any outlandish statements
Ding ding ding! First it was the special task force to jail Clinton. Then it was investigating the 3 million illegals/dead people who voted. Now we apparently have the HIC investigating something Trump didn't even provide proof of.
I find it even more baffling the media just draws to him like flies on shite. I get he is the president but when you publicize this shite non-stop you're just giving him more power.
How ironic the people who were so upset about the trump/russia stuff being reported on are now cumming their pants that the media is reporting on Trump's claim to which he did not provide any evidence.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 3:42 pm to montanagator
quote:
Nunes also said he see's no evidence of Trump's allegations.
He just announced the investigation two days ago.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 5:26 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
Should I add Wikileaks revelation that the CIA has the technology to make hacking attempts appear to originate from Russia?
You have got to be fricking kidding me.
Posted on 3/7/17 at 5:28 pm to Tiger Tracker
quote:
On that note, will the Obamagate chasers actually accept the verdict if they don't agree with it?
No. The answer is clearly no. People will defend the actions, no matter how absurd, of anyone based only on the "R" or the "D" that appears next to their name.
Page 9 of 24
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News