- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Democrats, American Library Association , draft bill protecting sexually explicit material
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:04 am to TBoy
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:04 am to TBoy
Why is it important for you to read porn to kids? You are a groomer and potentially a pedophile if you’re acting on your kid fantasies
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:05 am to TBoy
quote:
The editorializing of the article is “sexually explicit.” What that means to different people is different. Sex education is a proper subject for schools. Banning sex education used to be a thing for the hyper-moralistic nut jobs. Now banning sex education is a right wing priority. No sex education typically results in more pregnant teens.
What does showing pictures of adolescent males sucking off adult males have to do with sex ed?
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:07 am to Peebles
quote:
That's weird how your want to read porn and have sexual conversations with little kids.
Groomer/Pedo alert!!!!
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:07 am to Peebles
Lol and of course peebles to the rescue.
You suck fricks are so predictable.
You suck fricks are so predictable.
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:09 am to thebigmuffaletta
Can we get a pop up book showing the damage done by unprotected kinky sex? Not including appearing in the Castro Street gay festival in bondage wear?
Posted on 10/2/23 at 8:09 am to dgnx6
I don’t understand what turns them on, sexually, for kids. It’s just sick and they all should be put up against a wall
Posted on 10/2/23 at 9:01 am to Bourre
quote:
sexually, for kids.
Just another stop on that slippery slope that does not exist...
Posted on 10/2/23 at 9:25 am to thebigmuffaletta
All we had was the National Geographic.
Posted on 10/2/23 at 9:28 am to TBoy
quote:
No sex education typically results in more pregnant teens.
If they are stupid and have shitty parents, of course.
I'm perfectly fine letting nature run its course.
Posted on 10/2/23 at 9:56 am to thebigmuffaletta
You want to see a conservative ANTIFA pop up? Go after their kids after they've told you to frick off.
Posted on 10/2/23 at 9:58 am to TBoy
quote:
The editorializing of the article is “sexually explicit.” What that means to different people is different. Sex education is a proper subject for schools. Banning sex education used to be a thing for the hyper-moralistic nut jobs. Now banning sex education is a right wing priority.
Yep, all of a sudden, for no reason at all, parents are after sex Ed. It has nothing to do with the LGBTQ rainbow warriors all of a sudden wanting to brainwash our children with their bullshite as early in our children's lives as possible.
Posted on 10/2/23 at 12:28 pm to thebigmuffaletta
As Ann Coulter said, the left thinks the First Amendment exists to protect kiddie porn
Posted on 10/2/23 at 12:31 pm to thebigmuffaletta
democrats are Groomers and pedos
Posted on 10/2/23 at 12:32 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Yep, all of a sudden, for no reason at all, parents are after sex Ed. It has nothing to do with the LGBTQ rainbow warriors all of a sudden wanting to brainwash our children with their bull shite as early in our children's lives as possible.
“If all the boys just suck dick then we can prevent teen pregnancy. See, this is really about sex education” ~ Groomers
Posted on 10/2/23 at 1:20 pm to Bourre
quote:
Why is it important for you to read porn to kids?
Part of the thrill for these animals is flaunting their perversion in the face of the normies.
Popular
Back to top

1








