- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did Kavenaugh stop Vince Foster investigation?
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:27 am to I B Freeman
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:27 am to I B Freeman
quote:
Right but no authorities would say so.
Bc they didn't want to get Clinton'd
quote:
This guy is saying Kavenaugh had the evidence and squashed it.
This guy is a functional retard
quote:
Did you see the picture of Bret and WJC on Air Force one?
No
quote:
Can he be so establishment he covered for Clinton?
Interesting question......now you're going to give me a damn headache bc I'm going to probably go search this shite out
0
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:28 am to Wtodd
Even more crazy. Kavenaugh obviously reported to Starr
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:36 am to I B Freeman
Any chance the Dems use this info as a disqualifying talking point? Does Schumer give a speech today talking about Kav covering up Vince Fosters murder? Something is again fishy about all of this. Why is this just now being discussed by anyone. This is coming from Yahoo of all places. Last ditch effort to turn reps against themselves and they are trying to use our hate for the clintons to do it.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:37 am to I B Freeman
This should be fairly easy to debunk if false, simply release the unredacted evidence.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:39 am to I B Freeman
quote:
Read the article
This stood out to me giving me concerns about the author of the article:
quote:.
This is not the place to revisit the Foster case, the electric third rail of US politics. But it is worth noting two points that touch on Mr Kavanaugh
Why not if he thinks a grave injustice was done during the investigation? I know you can't answer for him but for this guy to be chastising BK and not his higher ups just smells of a political bias to me.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:40 am to I B Freeman
yeah,... At this point I think it is fair to assume any negative information released about Kavanaugh between about 2 weeks ago and when he is actually confirmed is likely BS.
So ignore that (likely false, planted to make him look bad to conservatives) story.
So ignore that (likely false, planted to make him look bad to conservatives) story.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:40 am to Johnpettigrew
Why this is being released right now, I don't know. But there is a faction in the Dem party that would like to be rid of the Clintons...and as their political usefulness to that party is over, would let them be imprisoned to keep a GOP nominee off the court.
...oh and that faction of the Dem party are not our allies just because they want to be rid of the Clintons. They want that because they see them as an obstacle to moving the Dems further left.
...oh and that faction of the Dem party are not our allies just because they want to be rid of the Clintons. They want that because they see them as an obstacle to moving the Dems further left.
This post was edited on 10/3/18 at 6:50 am
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:42 am to Boatshoes
This is scary stuff the FBI SHOULD investigate and if true Trump should withdraw his name today.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:47 am to I B Freeman
quote:
Can he be so establishment he covered for Clinton?
Maybe. Playing the what if game...what if his nomination was in play in an effort to unearth that information. He isn t just a conservative...he is a Bush protege that may have covered criminal activity. If what you are guessing is true, then either Trump and his peeps knew in advance and this is a brilliant two edged assault on the "swamp", or just a stroke of amazing dumb luck. My guess is, Trump has surrounded himself with some high IQ insiders and this is truly 4d chess.
Amazing stuff either way and it is truly eye opening. As another poster stated, VF being murdered is pretty standard stuff. Tying it to both the Clinton and Bush families is next level stuff. Amazing really.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:49 am to I B Freeman
Wait. So now the left believes Foster was murdered by the Clintons and Kav covered it up?
Wow, really pulling out all stops...
Wow, really pulling out all stops...
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:49 am to Boatshoes
I agree. Is this witness still alive?
I think the point Pritchard is making is about Kavenaugh’s treatment of the witness and evidence. He is saying no need to argue about Foster’s death but there is reason to discount Kavenaugh because he kept the evidence away from the grand jury and wrote the portion of the Starr report concerning Foster.
I think the point Pritchard is making is about Kavenaugh’s treatment of the witness and evidence. He is saying no need to argue about Foster’s death but there is reason to discount Kavenaugh because he kept the evidence away from the grand jury and wrote the portion of the Starr report concerning Foster.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:51 am to Boatshoes
They had their chance to get rid of them 20 years ago. Lots of people have always thought VF was murdered and it has been a topic of contention for a long time. 20 years after Starr report, one of its prosecutors up for SCOTUS, lame sexual assault accusations, 7th fbi investigation that Schumer wanted public but now Feinstein says it should be sealed, dems in red states almost have to vote for Kav to save their political careers, and boom we have an article saying Kav his VF’’s murder. Let’s all calm down and think about it.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:52 am to I B Freeman
The TDS is strong with you.
Not only did he cover up the investigation, he raped Fosters corpse after drinking a 40 of Old English.
Not only did he cover up the investigation, he raped Fosters corpse after drinking a 40 of Old English.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:55 am to Rebel
Ambrose Pritchard is not a quack. He has been around for ages.
Wild story
Wild story
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:56 am to I B Freeman
I swear Democrats come here to learn.
Posted on 10/3/18 at 6:59 am to I B Freeman
At this point I would have a hard time believing any disqualifying accusations against Kavanaugh
Posted on 10/3/18 at 7:01 am to I B Freeman
Imagine Kav going down in flames and taking Hthe Clinton’s down with him for suiciding people
Posted on 10/3/18 at 7:01 am to I B Freeman
quote:
Ambrose Pritchard is not a quack. He has been around for ages.
Wild story
Those two statements are not exclusive.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News