- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Don Jr is tweeting about Hunter
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:35 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:35 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I’ve said it before.
I think I can take Kimberly Guilfoile.
I think I can take Kimberly Guilfoile.
0
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:39 pm to AMS
quote:No, CDawson suggested that the DoJ should prosecute him. I was replying to CDawson, not the OP.
Don Jr didn’t even claim he violated a law.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:39 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Shorty, you are paranoid.
ShortyRob
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:41 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
What US law did Baby Biden violate?
the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) 18 usc sec 1961, et seq. It allows prosecution and civil penalties for racketeering activity performed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise. Such activity may include illegal gambling, bribery, kidnapping, murder, money laundering, counterfeiting, embezzlement, drug trafficking, slavery, and a host of other unsavory business practices.
It brought down the 5 Families. It can sure as shite bring down the Bidens.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:41 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Shorty, you are paranoid
Nah
What you are isn't some giant secret
You aren't THAT good
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:43 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:You are discussing the legal standard of relevance under the FRE.
In all fairness Don Jr was at the meeting he’s referencing (wasn’t it supposedly about Russian adoptions?), Hunter wasn’t on the phone call. Just because Hunter may have been the subject of the call doesn’t make him relevant to the the crime committed on the call though which is what the investigation is over. Should we have called in the Russian kids up for adoption as witnesses because they were supposedly the topic of the meeting w Don Jr?
On this topic on this forum, that is not the standard. The standard is “Does it support GEOTUS? If so, it is relevant.”
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:46 pm to AggieHank86
quote:like it was pulled directly from the daily kos
On this topic on this forum, that is not the standard. The standard is “Does it support GEOTUS? If so, it is relevant
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:54 pm to AggieHank86
Hank. Its sort of weird to know that you believe it doesn’t serve a valid national security interest for the President of the United States to determine whether a foreign government was involved in a bribery scheme wherein our own public officials accepted a kickback from a government contract they negotiated with a foreign power, and how that kickback may have affected our national policy.
If this same fact pattern existed in a domestic Federal Contract of any kind-it is De facto illegal. Meaning, simply the fact that a blood relative of a sitting public official in charge of setting the policy at issue, benefited from the contract. Not just illegal. But a felony.
To me, it’s fricking WORSE than if Hunter Biden (a cokehead with no demonstrable ethics) provably profited from some domestic construction project and potentially laundered payments that he held on to until his dad was no longer VP. Hunter Biden demonstrably profited from a transaction for which he potentially laundered money to hold for his dad who was negotating our foreign policy.
This is so shitty and awful I cannot stand it. I don’t think it was in any way appropriate for Trump to ask for an investigation of the Bidens- I WANT THESE SHADY BASTARDS INVESTIGATED. CRiminally.
If this same fact pattern existed in a domestic Federal Contract of any kind-it is De facto illegal. Meaning, simply the fact that a blood relative of a sitting public official in charge of setting the policy at issue, benefited from the contract. Not just illegal. But a felony.
To me, it’s fricking WORSE than if Hunter Biden (a cokehead with no demonstrable ethics) provably profited from some domestic construction project and potentially laundered payments that he held on to until his dad was no longer VP. Hunter Biden demonstrably profited from a transaction for which he potentially laundered money to hold for his dad who was negotating our foreign policy.
This is so shitty and awful I cannot stand it. I don’t think it was in any way appropriate for Trump to ask for an investigation of the Bidens- I WANT THESE SHADY BASTARDS INVESTIGATED. CRiminally.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:58 pm to ShortyRob
Classic conservative move to spend hours on an internet message board running interference for the left
This post was edited on 1/18/20 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 1/18/20 at 12:59 pm to AggieHank86
quote:The FCPA right off the top. Quite likely several RICO statutes given his fathers admissions. Good grief.
What US law did Baby Biden violate?
This post was edited on 1/18/20 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:02 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Whats hilarious is to go look at the headlines when Kushner was hired. All the loons were crying “Nepotism!!!”.
like it was pulled directly from the daily kos
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:04 pm to Wednesday
quote:Search my posts. That is not remotely my view. Had this request gone through law enforcement channels (e.g. request by FBI to Interpol) and had some supporting domestic evidence other than speculation, I would even advocate for a request to Ukraine for support of an FBI investigation.
Hank. Its sort of weird to know that you believe it doesn’t serve a valid national security interest for the President of the United States to determine whether a foreign government was involved in a bribery scheme wherein our own public officials accepted a kickback from a government contract they negotiated with a foreign power, and how that kickback may have affected our national policy
The MANNER in which the request was made does, however, cause me to question whether the motives were actually “political,” as opposed to “law enforcement.” The circumstances do not pass the smell test (i.e. “appearance of impropriety”).
Where there is smoke, there is not necessarily fire. Even where there is a small fire, it is not necessarily a high crime or misdemeanor. I do NOT think that call should give rise to impeachment proceedings.
This post was edited on 1/18/20 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:07 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:Not remotely applicable. Baby Biden was not bribing Ukrainian governmental officials.
The FCPA right off the top
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:16 pm to NIH
You continue to think that you are accomplishing something by asserting that I am not something which I have never claimed to be.
You managed to navigate law school, and to pass the bar. I would hope that you are smarter than this.
for the 1000th time, I have never claimed to be a “conservative,“ in the sense that that term is utilized on this forum.
I am not a social conservative, and I am not a protectionist or isolationist (which seem to be this forum’s defining characteristics for “conservatism.”)
I am a libertarian. I am an advocate of small, very-limited government. I am an advocate of federalism in the sense that it was practiced at the time of the founding of this country. I am an advocate of keeping government out of 90% of the things it currently sticks its nose into.
And I dislike Donald Trump, because he is none of those things.
You managed to navigate law school, and to pass the bar. I would hope that you are smarter than this.
for the 1000th time, I have never claimed to be a “conservative,“ in the sense that that term is utilized on this forum.
I am not a social conservative, and I am not a protectionist or isolationist (which seem to be this forum’s defining characteristics for “conservatism.”)
I am a libertarian. I am an advocate of small, very-limited government. I am an advocate of federalism in the sense that it was practiced at the time of the founding of this country. I am an advocate of keeping government out of 90% of the things it currently sticks its nose into.
And I dislike Donald Trump, because he is none of those things.
This post was edited on 1/18/20 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:19 pm to AggieHank86
Ahh yes nothing says small government like spending hours on an internet message board running interference for the left
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:22 pm to AggieHank86
LOL
Which is why when you need evidence, you pull an absolute KOOK far leftist from the Daily Kos and call him credible while simultaneously failing to actually cite him at first.
Which is why when you need evidence, you pull an absolute KOOK far leftist from the Daily Kos and call him credible while simultaneously failing to actually cite him at first.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:23 pm to NIH
quote:
Hunter by NIH
Ahh yes nothing says small government like spending hours on an internet message board running interference for the left
While pretending you aren't!!
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:24 pm to NIH
I can guarantee you that if I went to the DU and posted using EXACTLY AH's approach, they'd spot me in under 24 hrs
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:25 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
What US law did Baby Biden violate?
We need a Special Council to investigate Joe’s Quid Pro Quo and see if there are connections to Burisma, Joe, and Hunter.
Posted on 1/18/20 at 1:26 pm to ShortyRob
Shorty, I made passing reference to something that people had been discussing for a year, and ... no ... I did not cite the ultimate source for a throwaway comment. From that, you have constructed a house of cards with a tinfoil roof.
Seek help.
Seek help.
Page 2 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News