Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Federal Circuit clears path for tariff refunds | Page 3 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Federal Circuit clears path for tariff refunds

Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:55 am to
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140341 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:55 am to
quote:

Cantor Fitzgerald, a financial services company led by the sons of US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, has extended an offer to purchase the rights to potential refunds from companies that have paid tariffs imposed by Donald Trump. This move allows investors to speculate on the potential reversal of Trump's tariff policies in court.


Cantor Fitzgerald Offers 20% to 30% for Trump Tariff Refund Rights
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471784 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:55 am to
quote:

What's the "conspiracy theory" here?

Implying the behavior of the admin wasn't a huge error and was part of a larger plan is the conspiracy theory.

The alternative was the admin engaged in a massive frickup and Lutnick was smart enough to realize how to take advantage of that post-hoc.
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
130724 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:55 am to
quote:

It's not any statement of our power to tariff, generally. It's about our administration's ability to read.

The ultimate “DEI” hires.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471784 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:56 am to
quote:

Nothing was "bad" about the ruling


Having the tariffs ruled illegal was bad for the admin.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
27423 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:57 am to
quote:

Implying the behavior of the admin wasn't a huge error and was part of a larger plan is the conspiracy theory.



I didn't get that but I agree it's unlikely.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471784 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:58 am to
quote:

I didn't get that

Go back to his resopnse to me saying they fricked up bigly

He responded with:

quote:




Clearly he doesn't think it was a mistake.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140341 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:58 am to
quote:

This was all done months after the admin fricked up.

Lutnick was just smart enough to realize the error of their frickup after the fact. It doesn't show he planned this and it ignores the other actors involved (specifically Bessent).


Ahh, you are going with the benevolent mens rea argument. That's fine. Me neither you can prove if the act was intentional or accidental before the contracts were executed.
Posted by HeartAttackTiger
Member since Sep 2009
562 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:59 am to
quote:

SlowFlowPro


Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
96406 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:00 am to
quote:

Having the tariffs ruled illegal was bad for the admin.


Yet tariffs continue

So it wasnt bad. It gave them a SC ruling roadmap. It was only bad not hiring you to their team amirite
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140341 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:01 am to
If Lunick and the boys what to make this a lot less unscrupulous for the Administration they should void these contracts and recoup the importers of the full refunds.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
114069 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:02 am to
Hope all these companies are prepared for the deep dive into their finances/business practices, because they are going to have to very clearly and convincingly show they didn't pass any of it onto their customers (and exactly how much tariff they paid) to even submit a claim.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471784 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:03 am to
quote:

Yet tariffs continue

Via channels that were clearly the path from the get go. Why didn't they admit the mistake months ago and actually solve the problem before it became such a large one?

quote:

It gave them a SC ruling roadmap.

The roadmap existed prior to this ruling

For people who can read at least
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
140341 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:04 am to
quote:

Hope all these companies are prepared for the deep dive into their finances/business practices, because they are going to have to very clearly and convincingly show they didn't pass any of it onto their customers (and exactly how much tariff they paid) to even submit a claim.



And the Commerce Department should oversee this.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
27423 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:05 am to
quote:

Hope all these companies are prepared for the deep dive into their finances/business practices, because they are going to have to very clearly and convincingly show they didn't pass any of it onto their customers


Is there a legal basis for this or is it just the way you think it should be?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471784 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:05 am to
quote:

because they are going to have to very clearly and convincingly show they didn't pass any of it onto their customers

No they won't
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
96406 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:06 am to
quote:

Why didn't they admit the mistake months ago and actually solve the problem before it became such a large one?


What ia the large problem if tariffs continue. You think a refund that will be tied uo in courts for years is a concern


quote:

threads on here where Bessent referenced them also prior to the ruling.



They should.have hired you
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471784 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:07 am to
quote:

Is there a legal basis for this or is it just the way you think it should be?

The latter

We already have road maps for this. When taxes are ruled illegal this "pass onto consumer" step of the analysis doesn't exist.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471784 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:08 am to
quote:

What ia the large problem if tariffs continue


Refunding hundreds of billions of dollars

quote:

You think a refund that will be tied uo in courts for years is a concern

Why wouldn't it be?
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
17455 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:10 am to
quote:

What does this have to do with the Supreme Court ruling in any way?


I didn’t say that it did. I am simply asking a question. These are the methods by which other countries protect their own industries and we cannot use these same methods. The response will be that we need to go through congress and the senate to get it approved appropriately. But we all know that isn’t going to happen. The lobbyist for these various industries will line the pockets of our representatives to ensure they don’t ever do what is right by our own citizens.
Posted by Ten Bears
Florida
Member since Oct 2018
4908 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:15 am to
quote:

It's almost like this was the plan. But what the hell do I know


No they fricked up. They didn’t want to take the time and do the work to use the proper statutes that authorize tariffs.

And even those statutes have limitations with amounts, timelines etc, and Trump wanted the ability to do whatever he wanted so they chose IEEPA.

And here we are.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram