- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hot Take: It's terrible strategy to deport in solid blue states
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:52 pm to SirWinston
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:52 pm to SirWinston
Deportations are happening all over the country. You only hear about this in blue states because that is where the commies are most active.
0
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:53 pm to SirWinston
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
Where are Feds allocated at this time?
A typical allocation to a law abiding state would be less than needed now yes?
So, don’t follow the laws.
Feds come in to address the lawbreaking and then the issue is not enough federal resources…states literally created the need for more resources.
Whether it be tax payers dollars or enforcement of laws.
A typical allocation to a law abiding state would be less than needed now yes?
So, don’t follow the laws.
Feds come in to address the lawbreaking and then the issue is not enough federal resources…states literally created the need for more resources.
Whether it be tax payers dollars or enforcement of laws.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:55 pm to SirWinston
It’s a tough question. On one hand, you’re right. On the other, I hate the idea of conceding a state from our country. But I would absolutely support it, if it meant cutting federal funding to any state or city that declares itself a ‘sanctuary.’
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm not shocked you don't understand what's being discussed
No, it fits. It’s just funny the way I used your words to fit what the majority of the country wants.
And no, it’s not a terrible strategy to deport in solid blue states. They use these illegals to gain more House seats. They vote, even though it’s illegal. They drain resources.
Right now, the Left is seeing their future in this country disintegrating with every illegal that’s deported.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:56 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
Where are Feds allocated at this time?
A typical allocation to a law abiding state would be less than needed now yes?
So, don’t follow the laws.
Feds come in to address the lawbreaking and then the issue is not enough federal resources…states literally created the need for more resources.
None of this applies to a federal-only duty/operation.
You're conflating another state-federal LEO scenario.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:58 pm to SirWinston
Florida and Texas have millions of illegal immigrants. Why not focus there?
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:58 pm to SirWinston
Nothing hot about it. Just cold pile of dogsh-t take.
This post was edited on 1/27/26 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 1/27/26 at 3:58 pm to Placekicker
quote:
It’s just funny the way I used your words
Retarded, not funny.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 4:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What is the specific % from illegals being deported? I imagine very low for CA, NY, and ILL.
Opposite actually based on data through late 2025. Roughly 1/4 are coming from these three states.
Metric ICE Interior Arrests (May–Oct 2025), Pending Deportation Cases (late 2025), Voluntary Departures (Sept 2025)
California 15,531, 193,212, Est. 12%
New York 5,518, 149,912, Est. 9%
Illinois 2,807, 27,039, Est. 3%
Combined (3 States) ~20%, ~28%, ~24%
Posted on 1/27/26 at 4:00 pm to Placekicker
quote:
Right now, the Left is seeing their future in this country disintegrating with every illegal that’s deported.
More the worry of leaks about money flow being controlled and distributed outside normal government channels.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 4:01 pm to ronricks
quote:
Texas have millions of illegal immigrants. Why not focus there?
Texas currently accounts for 23% of all deportations happening. They are working hard there
Posted on 1/27/26 at 4:01 pm to SirWinston
Posted on 1/27/26 at 4:02 pm to SirWinston
Screw the law if it’s in a blue state. Is that your stance?
Posted on 1/27/26 at 4:02 pm to SirWinston
quote:
SirWinston
Another really dumb take by SW.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 4:03 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
Screw the law if it’s in a blue state. Is that your stance?
if we are going to selectively enforce or not enforce the laws then who chooses and what criteria do they use?
Posted on 1/27/26 at 4:05 pm to AwesomeSauce
quote:
Opposite actually based on data through late 2025. Roughly 1/4 are coming from these three states.
No. What % of the population exodus from those states is from illegals being deported.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 4:05 pm to supatigah
quote:
Trump isn't targeting blue states. They just gum up the works, so require more ICE presence.
From Feb–Oct 2025, red states disproportionately more ICE arrests relative to their illegal migrant population share. Large blue states like California, New York, and Illinois fell well below expectation.
That's kind of the basis of his argument in OP.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 4:07 pm to supatigah
quote:
if we are going to selectively enforce or not enforce the laws
We already have to do that. There is no 100% coverage.
quote:
and what criteria do they use?
That depends on what's guiding the policy.
For instance, I'm still not sure why Trump decided a surge in MN was smart on the back of reporting about ethnic Somali citizens and green card holders engaging in fraud. I'm curious about the criteria/logic there, myself.
What Winnie is arguing, and I have before, is if the goal is maximizing deportations, the criteria should be based on (1) population of illegals and (2) cooperation from local/state authorities.
Posted on 1/27/26 at 4:08 pm to SirWinston
quote:
You face rabid opposition
Apathy is not an admirable quality.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News