- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I just don't understand why in the 50s and 60s these shootings were extremely rare.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:51 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:51 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:iyo, how does my knowledge or lack their of regarding the size of ammunition relate to violence in the 50's & 60's vs now?
Is a .223 a particularly mean round compared to say... a 30.06?
j/k i know you're trying to build that strawman up
1
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:51 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
a 30.06
my gun.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:52 pm to kingbob
quote:yes they were, but for some reason the OP decided to throw the 1950's in for their comparison
Besides, most of the weapons used in school shootings are simple pistols, shotguns, and hunting rifles that were even more readily available in 1960 than they are now.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:52 pm to kingbob
quote:
The explosion in school shootings didn't occur until after Columbine in 1996.
The attention given to the killers was key imo
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:53 pm to stout
quote:i've not once painted the AR15 to be the boogieman. you ammosexuals just assume anybody that doesn't metaphorically blow the second amendment hates guns
It's a legit question since you are blaming the AR15 as the boogeyman just like every other idiot does.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:53 pm to Machine
quote:
iyo, how does my knowledge or lack their of regarding the size of ammunition relate to violence in the 50's & 60's vs now?
j/k i know you're trying to build that strawman up
No one is building a straw man against you. They are pointing out how ignorant you are is all. No straw man needed for that as you do a good job building that case on your own.
The fact that you can't answer his questions or mine shows you have no idea what you are talking about and should just exit this thread.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:53 pm to stout
quote:considering you've made up my position in this thread...
The fact that you can't answer his questions or mine shows you have no idea what you are talking about and should just exit this thread.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:55 pm to Numberwang
Call of Duty
Grand Theft Auto
Grand Theft Auto
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:55 pm to Machine
quote:
Besides, most of the weapons used in school shootings are simple pistols, shotguns, and hunting rifles that were even more readily available in 1960 than they are now.
yes they were, but for some reason the OP decided to throw the 1950's in for their comparison
Earlier in this thread you said
quote:
you mean before a majority of weapons we have readily available today were readily available. boy i wonder why.
GD you are fricking stupid.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:56 pm to Machine
quote:
considering you've made up my position in this thread...
You can't even make up your own mind what your position is. First you say the majority of weapons today weren't around in the 60s then agree with someone who says the opposite.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:57 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
The attention given to the killers was key imo
Yep! Now every little neglected, picked-on, pimple wants to be a legend.
Some grow out of it and some are consumed by it.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:58 pm to stout
quote:the counter to my point was 2 anecdotes.
You can't even make up your own mind what your position is. First you say the majority of weapons today weren't around in the 60s then agree with someone who says the opposite.
both of said anecdotes being guns created in the 2nd of the two decades mentioned in the OP
you guys are great for gut-laughs. i love this site.Posted on 2/15/18 at 5:01 pm to Machine
So no kids had access to rifles in the 50s. Got it.
You still have failed to answer any questions asked of you which tells me you know your argument was BS from the beginning.
You still have failed to answer any questions asked of you which tells me you know your argument was BS from the beginning.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 5:02 pm to stout
quote:
So no kids had access to rifles in the 50s. Got it.
solid deduction. would expect nothing less from a mouth-breahter like you
Posted on 2/15/18 at 5:04 pm to stout
quote:
They are pointing out how ignorant you are is al
Correct. Sometimes the dumbest have the strongest opinions.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 5:04 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Is a .223 a particularly mean round compared to say... a 30.06?
FMJ .223:
Weight 55 grains.
Muz energy 1099 ft. lbs.
Muz vel 3000 ft./sec.
FMJ .30-06:
Weight 150 grains.
Muz energy 2970 ft. lbs.
Muz vel 3000 ft./sec.
'06 is heavier with more knock-down power, larger round than a .223. Louder and kicks more too. For larger game.
This post was edited on 2/15/18 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 2/15/18 at 5:05 pm to Machine
Continue to ignore my questions because you know answering them will show your ignorance.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 5:06 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Correct. Sometimes the dumbest have the strongest opinions.
And he's definitely one of our dumbest.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 5:06 pm to Mizzou Mule
quote:
06 is heavier with more knock-down power. Kicks more too
Yeah I was trying to get our board expert (machine) to chime in and see if I were missing something
Posted on 2/15/18 at 5:06 pm to stout
quote:i figured when i mentioned my "Lack there of" in regards to ammunition knowledge, you'd have been able to deduce i'm not an ammosexual
Continue to ignore my questions because you know answering them will show your ignorance.
but i've been known to give knuckle-dragers too much credit
This post was edited on 2/15/18 at 5:07 pm
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News