- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
loogaroo
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | Welsh |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 40126 |
| Registered on: | 12/6/2005 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
Defund the police, cashless bail, paid protesters and now babies. It all adds up.
Posted by loogaroo on 1/17/26 at 8:41 am
The left is trying so desperately to build up this goon army. They have to know this isn’t going to work anywhere outside of blue cities…right?
0
re: Woman who doxxed MN ICE agent Jonathan Ross’ address FIRED from her job
Posted by loogaroo on 1/17/26 at 8:35 am to Reubaltaich
quote:
Also a felony on her record for life. These people are downright stoo'pid,
Look who they listen to.
re: Grand Jury Subpoenas Minnesota Governor Walz & Mayor Frey in ICE Obstruction Probe
Posted by loogaroo on 1/17/26 at 8:34 am to cajunangelle
Must be why Frey was crawfishing.
I believe this is the second judge trying to do this. It doesn’t mean anything.
Students were bussed in to protest ICE.
Posted by loogaroo on 1/16/26 at 12:44 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
BREAKING: Students from Saint Paul Public Schools in Mn left class to march in an anti-ICE protest, saying they want to "get rid of ICE" and that "no one is illegal on stolen land." Some students admitted to warning illegals online to stay home and avoid ICE, while others compare ICE to Nazis. This district should be DEFUNDED. This indoctrination and political activism are completely unacceptable @usedgov
Axios is trying to say Trump is losing independents because of deportations.
Posted by loogaroo on 1/16/26 at 9:57 am
:rotflmao:
https://www.axios.com/2026/01/16/trump-polling-immigration-approval-rating-ice-noem
bullshite! If he is losing any support, it's because ICE is playing too nice with these protesters.
quote:
President Trump's team recently reviewed private GOP polling that showed support for his immigration policies falling. The results, reflected in public surveys, bolstered internal concern about the administration's confrontational enforcement tactics.
Now, as the chaotic scenes from Minnesota play out around the clock on TV and social media, Axios has learned that some Trump advisers quietly are talking about "recalibrating" the White House's approach — though it's unclear what changes Trump would embrace, if any.
quote:
By the numbers: The internal GOP polling that alarmed some Trump insiders was completed at the end of December, days before an ICE agent fatally shot Renee Good in Minneapolis.
60% of independent voters and 58% of undecided voters said Trump was "too focused" on deporting illegal immigrants, the poll viewed by Trump's team found.
33% said Trump was primarily deporting law-abiding people, as opposed to criminals.
ICE is taking a reputational hit. Two public surveys released this week — one from CNN, another from YouGov — found that most Americans said the agency was making U.S. cities less safe.
Another poll done for the Associated Press after Good's death found that just 38% of Americans now approve of Trump's immigration policies.
https://www.axios.com/2026/01/16/trump-polling-immigration-approval-rating-ice-noem
bullshite! If he is losing any support, it's because ICE is playing too nice with these protesters.
Glenn Beck said when Iran falls, all the atrocities from Muslims will be shown to the world.
Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE) said he would lean toward impeachment if Trump takes Greenland.
Posted by loogaroo on 1/15/26 at 10:27 am
quote:
A House Republican is warning that if President Donald Trump were to order a military invasion of Greenland, it “would be the end of his presidency.” In an interview with the Omaha World-Herald, Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE) said he personally would “lean toward” voting to impeach the president if he were to follow through on threats to take over Greenland. “I’ll be candid with you. There’s so many Republicans mad about this,” Bacon told the paper. “If he went through with the threats, I think it would be the end of his presidency.”
https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/house-republican-says-he-would-lean-toward-impeaching-trump-if-he-were-to-invade-greenland-would-be-the-end-of-his-presidency/
re: Tim Burchett feels like the rest of us real Americans.
Posted by loogaroo on 1/15/26 at 10:03 am to TigerAxeOK
quote:
I'd vote for Tim Burchett for President over literally anyone right now.
Yep
It’s depressing and all so exhausting.
Judicial Watch…federal funding for the purchase and use of fetal remains.
Posted by loogaroo on 1/15/26 at 9:59 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Judicial Watch uncovered some of the most disturbing records ever seen: federal funding for the purchase and use of fetal remains, paid for with your tax dollars. Records describe organs, skulls, and skin taken from aborted unborn babies. @TomFitton
quote:
how is it this hard??? they've been doing this since 2016
This^^
Only thing I can see is that there are RINOs involved and it’s taking time. Look at the 46 house RINOs that voted no on defunding Judge Boasberg’s staff.
quote:
he hung little TimmyTampon out to dry last night.
What happened? I missed it.
Minnesota is building ‘video database’ for future prosecution of ICE officers.
Posted by loogaroo on 1/15/26 at 6:24 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
TIM WALZ: "If you see these ICE agents in your neighborhood, take out that phone and hit record." "Help us create a database of the atrocities against Minnesotans, not just to establish a record for posterity, but to bank evidence for future prosecution."
46 is a lot. Someone must be throwing a lot of cash around.
re: Supreme Court ruling allows political candidates to sue over election laws.
Posted by loogaroo on 1/14/26 at 4:35 pm to omegaman66
quote:
How in the hell can something this freaking obvious ever get into the court system.
Too many attorneys. Ethics are far gone.
Supreme Court ruling allows political candidates to sue over election laws.
Posted by loogaroo on 1/14/26 at 3:15 pm
quote:
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that political candidates have the legal standing to challenge election laws before voting or counting starts.
The case before the court was brought by Illinois Republican U.S. Rep. Michael Bost and other candidates, who wanted to challenge a state law that allows election officials to count mail ballots that arrive up to two weeks after Election Day, as long as they're postmarked on time.
Many states have laws that offer a buffer, or grace period, to voters to return mail ballots in case there are issues with the postal service, for example.
quote:
A lower court ruled that Bost did not have standing to challenge the Illinois law.
The conservative-majority Supreme Court, in a 7-2 ruling, disagreed.
Chief Justice John Roberts authored the opinion, writing that "[c]andidates have a concrete and particularized interest in the rules that govern the counting of votes in their elections, regardless whether those rules harm their electoral prospects or increase the cost of their campaigns."
Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote a concurring opinion, joined by liberal Justice Elena Kagan. Liberal Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor dissented.
In her dissent, Justice Jackson argued that the court was giving candidates the ability to sue in advance of provable harm, despite the fact that most voters don't have that ability.
"In a democratic society like ours, the interest in a fair electoral process is common to all members of the voting public," she wrote. "I believe that political candidates can and should be held to the same actual-injury requirements as other litigants."
https://www.npr.org/2026/01/14/nx-s1-5677318/supreme-court-bost-decision-candidate-standing
quote:
I don’t know who either of you are. Unlike some on this board, I don’t stalk.
That being said, you made a claim in the thread OP, another poster asked you for specifics, and now you are asking why this is so important to him?
You sound like an idiot with this.
I gave him the specifics.
You haven't been paying attention to who the alter/trolls are.
Popular
8
