Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Impressive support for Intelligent Design | Page 11 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Impressive support for Intelligent Design

Posted on 2/21/26 at 1:20 pm to
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27359 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

You are assuredly wrong. However, in the instance of those who actually are atheist, theirs is merely a different faith choice, no more founded than those of theist faiths.


What faith do atheists necessarily have?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
136994 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

See how easy and unproductive that is.
Your allusion to logic is ironic. The term you are searching for is "agnostic," not atheistic. Science is agnostic. Science neither supports atheism, nor theism, both of which are unprovable (at this point) belief sets, aka Faiths.

Perhaps you learned something today?
This post was edited on 2/21/26 at 1:36 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
136994 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

What faith do atheists necessarily have?
The unfalsifiable belief there is no God.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
70077 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 1:35 pm to
The faith that the universe was created by nothing
Posted by Marquesa
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2020
1867 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 1:46 pm to
The complexity of existing life is very compelling from a design standpoint. But the orgin of life is even moreso. No one but no one can explain how life arose. The simplist form of life is a symphony of order and complexity. It goes beyond having billions of years of trying when the checmical soup you need to pull together is not stable for more than a few seconds at any given point. So it's not the billions of years that solves the problem, it's the microseconds needed to create a complex and molecule from volitale elements that is the problem that cannot be solved by "chance".
This post was edited on 2/21/26 at 1:48 pm
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27359 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

The unfalsifiable belief there is no God.


So Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, etc. aren't atheists?
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27359 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

The faith that the universe was created by nothing


Please tell me which atheists think this.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
70077 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:08 pm to
I would guess most atheists believe the whole of existence went from an infinitely small and dense point to an infinite universe in the span of a plank second for no particular reason.

Which ones don't?
This post was edited on 2/21/26 at 2:08 pm
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27359 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

The faith that the universe was created by nothing


quote:

I would guess most atheists believe the whole of existence went from an infinitely small and dense point


An infinitely small and dense point is "nothing"?

quote:

for no particular reason


You think that atheists, who are naturalists, think that things occur in the universe for "no particular reason"? Like, you think they think things don't obey the laws of physics?
This post was edited on 2/21/26 at 2:15 pm
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
70077 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:15 pm to
I think there isn't an atheist on the planet that can explain how we got here, from a factual basis.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27359 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

I think there isn't an atheist on the planet that can explain how we got here, from a factual basis.


And? Why is "I don't know but I have some guesses." such a bad response?

At least their not completely confident in a process that can only be backed up by faith.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
70077 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

And? Why is "I don't know but I have some guesses." such a bad response?


Because, brilliant one, the foundation of my entry into this thread was about the faith of atheists.

Why must you people dance in circles instead of just understanding the first time?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
136994 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, etc. aren't atheists?
E.g., Hitchens acknowledged that strict philosophical rigor might push one toward agnosticism (since the non-existence of God is technically unfalsifiable), but he rejected the agnostic label in practice. So he was an agnostic who self identified as atheist. I really don't care about self identification.

I do care about science. Science is inherently agnostic. That really is not a debatable concept.

If you believe there is no God, it is by the context of that statement a "belief." If somehow one could prove there is no God, than atheism would be more than a faith.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27359 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Because, brilliant one, the foundation of my entry into this thread was about the faith of atheists.


Yes, and you can have an idea of how something might have occurred without having faith that it did in fact occur in that manner.

This isn't hard.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
136994 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

"I don't know but I have some guesses." such a bad response?
it isn't a bad response. But "some guesses" refers to belief rather than proof. It really isn't that complicated. Insistence that atheism is something other than a belief is silly. Atheism certainly is not scientific.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
70077 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

This isn't hard.


This is always a treat.

You trying to claim all Atheists are actually just curious universal agnostics isn't something anyone believes. Which is good for atheists I think because you're trying to tell me they can literally entertain any possibility as long as it's not about God. That is an absurd position.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27359 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

If you believe there is no God


What if you merely lack a belief in any gods, like Hitchens, Dawkins, Harris, Dennett, etc?
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27359 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

You trying to claim all Atheists are actually just curious universal agnostics isn't something anyone believes.


Translation:

"Virtually all the famous atheists I'll gladly, and often, refer to as atheists cease to be atheists when it no longer suits my argument."
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
27359 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

But "some guesses" refers to belief rather than proof.


Slice it however you want it, no "faith" is necessary to have a theory about abiogenesis or how matter came to be (if it ever did).
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
70077 posts
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:32 pm to
The guy who simplifies a topic such as God and the universe to "it isn't that hard" has no business trying to translate my thoughts.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram