- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Impressive support for Intelligent Design
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:44 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:44 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
There is zero chance humans aren’t intelligently designed, yet the designer haters fight tooth in nail to preserve their viewpoint so they can comfort themselves with the thought of no accountability for their actions.
tooth and nail genius
intelligent design is just relatively recent (110 yrs or so) reworking of old goat herders tales
1
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:45 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
I'm not sure how reliable someone's critical thinking abilities are if they still believe complex life was birthed from a single cell organism in a primordial soup somewhere on earth 4 billion years ago.
It would certainly take a lot of faith, which is funny in itself.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:46 pm to Mo Jeaux
You say this:
Then you say this:
So...are you a typical creationist, then, since you just posted what creationists supposedly post?
quote:
Evolutionary theory does not attempt to answer the question of the origin of life.
Then you say this:
quote:
This is a typical creationist tactic to say that it does not attempt
So...are you a typical creationist, then, since you just posted what creationists supposedly post?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:47 pm to wackatimesthree
Typo. That doesn’t change what evolutionary theory is.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:48 pm to beaux duke
quote:
intelligent design is just relatively recent (110 yrs or so) reworking of old goat herders tales
LOL.
No, it's actually the (obvious) most likely conclusion of what science has shown in three areas of science over the past 110ish years:
1. The origin of the universe
2. The origin of life
3. DNA
I found the guy who doesn't know anything about science or the Bible.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:48 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Typo.
O.k., so what did you mean to say? Because it could go either way.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:49 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Life developing from single cells over 4 billion years isn’t really any more of a stretch than God just plopping down a single man and woman in a thicket somewhere.
That all depends on the likelihood of life developing randomly from single cells over 4 billion years ago. Is there a plausible mechanism? I'm not talking about proving which mechanism it was, I'm talking about not even having a hypothesis.
If there's a simple explanation for something we rarely bother looking for other explanations. The singularity and life evolving by chance don't have simple explanations, so it's not unreasonable to expand the search.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:50 pm to RebelExpress38
Wait until they have technology sophisticated enough to map the human soul
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:51 pm to Bass Tiger
God was once approached by a scientist who said, “Listen, God, we’ve decided we don’t need you anymore. These days we can clone people, transplant organs, and do all sorts of things that used to be considered miraculous.”
God replied, “Don’t need me huh? How about we put your theory to the test. Why don’t we have a competition to see who can make a human being.”
The scientist agrees, so God declares they should do it as He did in the good old days when He created Adam.
“Fine,” says the scientist as he bends down to scoop up a handful of dirt.
“Whoa!” says God, shaking His head in disapproval. “Not so fast. You get your own dirt.”
God replied, “Don’t need me huh? How about we put your theory to the test. Why don’t we have a competition to see who can make a human being.”
The scientist agrees, so God declares they should do it as He did in the good old days when He created Adam.
“Fine,” says the scientist as he bends down to scoop up a handful of dirt.
“Whoa!” says God, shaking His head in disapproval. “Not so fast. You get your own dirt.”
This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:53 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I’ve never understood why the religious zealots refuse the notion that God created life through the natural processes we’ve discovered/hypothesized.
Life developing from single cells over 4 billion years isn’t really any more of a stretch than God just plopping down a single man and woman in a thicket somewhere.
It all depends on what you mean by that.
I have no problem believing that God created life through (almost) natural processes. I have a big problem believing that there was no Divine intervention in those processes at all.
And the reason I have a hard time believing it isn't because of what the Bible says. It's because of what science says. Specifically, science since about 1953.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:55 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
O.k., so what did you mean to say? Because it could go either way.
Exactly what I said. That evolutionary theory doesn’t attempt to answer the origin of life, so the origin of life poses no danger to evolutionary theory despite what you may think. Evolutionary theory stands on its own, whether God or a god or multiple gods created life, or whether lighting struck goo and life popped into being (as some have described it in this thread).
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:57 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Life developing from single cells over 4 billion years isn’t really any more of a stretch than God just plopping down a single man and woman in a thicket somewhere.
What kind of Bible "scholarship" is this? (Or even "Science"?)
Did you totally dismiss the OP's scientific-study on just one-millionth of a human brain that Harvard and Google spent 10 years mapping out? How does random chance given even an Infinity of time produce such intricacies of integrated form, function, growth, and communications and adaptations for the rest of the human body?
God spoke all Creation -- including Adam & Even into existence, out out dust. God is Supernatural. He alone testified to his method of Creation in Genesis.
"Science" also "spoke" their supposed 4 billion year old theory into existence....
Only whatever account they claimed to explain "the beginning of life" relied purely on pure speculation, junk math & science zealotry that can't come close to being proven OR prove-able. EVEN IF we spot you the original "single cells" to start the whole voodoo shebang moving out of the gate, how can "science" explain the rest of it?
The Theory of Evolution entire case and timeline is based upon a sand-castle of wishful thinking. It was built and reinforced entirely upon the supposed authority and "testimony" of a Gnostic-Luciferian science priesthood, which desperately to create its own "Creation" account -- by eliminating him while "discrediting" the Bible Truth.
The "Church of Science" deception cannot stand on anything but speculation, lies, and academic-institutional coercion.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:59 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
The Theory of Evolution entire case and timeline is based upon a sand-castle of wishful thinking.
How so?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:01 pm to EphesianArmor
So you can’t tell me?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:02 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:
I'm not sure how reliable someone's critical thinking abilities are if they still believe complex life was birthed from a single cell organism in a primordial soup somewhere on earth 4 billion years ago.
DO the math. number of evolutionary changes from single-celled organisms to humans divided by number of years since the big bang or whatever it was
Forget that - how did the single cells organisms spring up from the soup and how many changes did that take?
I don't know how it all happened but evolution is simplistic in the face of the facts we know.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:02 pm to Indefatigable
quote:What verses contradict which laws of logic?
Practically everything about it is illogical
quote:What you think you know.
..and completely opposite of everything we know about life and earth in general.
What you're saying is that the Bible contradicts your interpretation of reality as you understand it.
That isn't a violation of the laws of logic. It's a violation of your own belief system.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:03 pm to Decatur
quote:I see you aren't a fan of logical inference. Strange, considering science relies so heavily on it.
Thank you for explaining your faith-based rationale. That’s not science though.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:04 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
evolution is simplistic in the face of the facts we know.
So you don’t believe in evolutionary theory?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:11 pm to geoag58
quote:
If there was no creator then where did the inert matter from which life arose come from
If matter can neither be created or destroyed (law of conservation of mass) then it’s always been here in one form or another.
Page 3 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News