- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge blocks Trump prosecutors from accessing key evidence in Comey case
Posted on 12/8/25 at 7:13 am to Errerrerrwere
Posted on 12/8/25 at 7:13 am to Errerrerrwere
Go open that can of whoop azz!!!!!!
0
Posted on 12/8/25 at 7:18 am to ghost_rider10
quote:
These establishment judges are the worst of the worst. Neither side dares speak out against them.
Who can remove them from the bench?
Posted on 12/8/25 at 7:25 am to LSUtoBOOT
quote:
Who can remove them from the bench?
who can or will? If will, no one. ever.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 9:14 am to tigerfootball10
It’s gonna happen sooner or later. The question is which ones
Posted on 12/8/25 at 9:23 am to Riverside
This is insanely disgusting...
Posted on 12/8/25 at 9:30 am to loogaroo
Here is an interesting tidbit from her wiki
Environmental impact of conceal carry? Wtf?
Oh, and... she's 82 frikkin years old.
quote:
On March 19, 2009, in response to a joint lawsuit brought by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, the National Parks Conservation Association and the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees, Kollar-Kotelly issued a preliminary injunction whereby she blocked a rule that would permit visitors to national parks to carry concealed weapons.
The change of rule which she blocked had been enacted by the United States Department of the Interior after being supported by 51 members of Congress and passing an extended public comments period. She stated that her decision to block the change of rule was because there was no environmental analysis performed and therefore the Interior Department "ignored (without sufficient explanation) substantial information in the administrative record concerning environmental impacts" of the rule.[13]
Environmental impact of conceal carry? Wtf?
Oh, and... she's 82 frikkin years old.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News