- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:33 am to smh4wg
This is not a reliable study and it only proves that it's not hard to manipulate numbers if you're committed to it and unconcerned with ethics, as these researchers were.
This post was edited on 1/25/22 at 8:36 am
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:35 am to BamaAtl
quote:
This is not a reliable study and it only proves that it's not hard to manipulate numbers if you're committed to it and unconcerned with ethics, as these researchers were.
Absolutely shocking declaration coming from you.
It’s uncanny.
This post was edited on 1/25/22 at 8:45 am
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:37 am to smh4wg
FLCCC is the Frontline Doctors, a group that has spread some ridiculous ideas. The study is published in Cureus, a journal that uses crowd-sourcing as peer review. When it is published in NEJM, Nature, or Lancet, run with it. Until then, file it away as interesting but not definitive.
Let the downvotes begin...
Let the downvotes begin...
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:38 am to smh4wg
REEEEE HORSEPASTE!!!
SHEEEEP DRENCH!!!!!
#SCIENCEDENIER!!!
-Banana Hammock
SHEEEEP DRENCH!!!!!
#SCIENCEDENIER!!!
-Banana Hammock
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:41 am to smh4wg
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:42 am to CasualBystander
quote:
When it is published in NEJM, Nature, or Lancet, run with it. Until then, file it away as interesting but not definitive.
You mean like the two fake, politically motivated HCQ studies that Lancet had to retract in 2020?
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:44 am to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
(China Virus) might have been done in 2020.
And Biden along with it. The whole point of Covid was for a mail in ballot election. Like Biden said..."it's not the number of votes, it's who counts the votes".
This is why wars a are fought.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:45 am to CasualBystander
(no message)
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:45 am to CasualBystander
Lancet published a fricking hit piece on hrdroxychloriquine based on a completely fabricated study.
The attacks on early prevention medications are coming from vaccine makers. Get your head out of your arse
The attacks on early prevention medications are coming from vaccine makers. Get your head out of your arse
This post was edited on 1/25/22 at 8:47 am
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:45 am to CasualBystander
Referencing Lancet as legit? Do some reading.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:49 am to Gifman
Its so lazy. Its like when they run on here and declare news stories like Hunter's laptop fake because; "The Legacy Media isnt reporting it".
They presume honesty from their favorite platforms and voices, in spite of countless retractions, scandals, and conflicts of interest.
Then POTUS attacked Acosta, it was an affront to the constitution. When POTUS attacks Doocy "I wish he would have done it sooner". They are fricking pigs.
They presume honesty from their favorite platforms and voices, in spite of countless retractions, scandals, and conflicts of interest.
Then POTUS attacked Acosta, it was an affront to the constitution. When POTUS attacks Doocy "I wish he would have done it sooner". They are fricking pigs.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:52 am to smh4wg
We have know this for a long time. The Dems and MSM did not want solutions to this problem until they were finished using it as a tool to remove Trump
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:53 am to smh4wg
Which is why Puerto Rico put it in care packages and distributed it to all their citizens 2 years ago….
I took Hydroxychloroquine and felt better within 2 days!
I took Hydroxychloroquine and felt better within 2 days!
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:55 am to smh4wg
It’s also why India is suing the CDC..
CDC lied and killed many in India when there are meds that could help!
Where is the media coverage?
CDC lied and killed many in India when there are meds that could help!
Where is the media coverage?
Posted on 1/25/22 at 8:56 am to Gifman
Reputable organizations that make mistakes issue retractions (quickly, in this case) and adjust their process. I realize confirmation bias is hard to overcome, but if the Frontline Quacks are your source, you may want to follow your own advice.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 9:02 am to smh4wg
They’ve always known it works.
That’s why they didn’t want the peasants taking it.
That’s why they didn’t want the peasants taking it.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 9:04 am to CasualBystander
Thats a dumb rationalization amigo. You came here and declared that its not to be trusted unless its published in Lancet, people immediately point out that Lancet has published fraudulent COVID studies, and you just dig your heels in on your own bias. Lancet, with regard to COVID, isnt any more reputable than my neighbor up the street.
Fauci admitted recently that the FDA is running COVID trials on Ivermectin, so even your "trusted sources" are giving this treatment merit.
Fauci admitted recently that the FDA is running COVID trials on Ivermectin, so even your "trusted sources" are giving this treatment merit.
Posted on 1/25/22 at 9:07 am to PorkSammich
quote:
They’ve always known it works.
That’s why they didn’t want the peasants taking it.
The feds have pulled EUA for monoclonal antibodies - which bears efficacy NO ONE disputes - because they claim it doesnt work against Omicron. Meanwhile, the vaccines, which they also admit doesnt work against Omicron, are still the crown jewel of the government's pandemic plan.
#science
Posted on 1/25/22 at 9:20 am to Vacherie Saint
My bias is to peer review. Legitimate journals rely on credibility. When they err, they correct, as Lancet did, or they are finished. Message boards and outlets that appeal to conspiracy do not have the same standard.
Lancet was one example. I listed two other great sources: NEJM and Nature. There are many, many more. They share one thing in common: legitimate peer review.
LINK
Lancet was one example. I listed two other great sources: NEJM and Nature. There are many, many more. They share one thing in common: legitimate peer review.
LINK
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News