- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Omar was sprayed with apple cider vinegar
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:20 pm to LordSaintly
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:20 pm to LordSaintly
quote:
She’s going to get swarmed by fruit flies now
she was already
0
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:21 pm to Ingeniero
What kind of attack would someone attempt with a spray bottle of apple cider vinegar? Def went for maximum damage
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:21 pm to DawgCountry
Will her skirt survive this “attack”?
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:22 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
BREAKING: Sources tell me it was apple cider vinegar that Rep. Ilhan Omar was sprayed with at last night’s event and that a hazmat team has confirmed that.
Hmm. Someone wanted to embarrass or otherwise use a substance on her to demean the rep.... and they used a substance that curiously is widely considered a blessed, healthy food in Islam and is highly regarded among Muslims.
"You suck representative!!! Here is a substance your beliefs hold in high regard!!! Gotcha!!! Ha ha haaaaa!!"
I mean...... that is verrrry curious.
I'm sure if I was attacked by some crazed leftist.. I wouldn't be showered with a fine French wine.
This post was edited on 1/28/26 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:23 pm to captainFid
A plastic tipped syringe at that
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:23 pm to mwade91383
quote:
Does smollet count? Certainly intended to hurt republican narratives?
Wow……the hoax was that a Republican attacked Smollett. There was no fake attack on a republican.
How do you get confused about this?
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:24 pm to GRTiger
Show us all you’re a reasonable person.
1) what % chance this is a hoax?
2) what % chance we get legitimate proof and people suffer real consequences?
1) what % chance this is a hoax?
2) what % chance we get legitimate proof and people suffer real consequences?
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:25 pm to KingofthePoint
Engaging radical leftists is silly.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:26 pm to mwade91383
quote:
mwade91383
As if you deserve an ounce of anyone's sincere time. What a joke of a human.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:26 pm to mwade91383
quote:
No, this actually illustrates my point perfectly. Literally doesn’t prove anything and Twitter weirdos are treating it like some kind of smoking gun. Classic. The funny thing, you wouldn’t even consider the possibility that this proves it was a hoax if some psycho attacked a republican politician. NEVER
aka “NUH UH!!!!”
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:27 pm to Y.A. Tittle
That a crazy person attacked Omar. That it’s not a “hoax”.
That is, unquestionably the most likely outcome (Occam’s razor).
That is, unquestionably the most likely outcome (Occam’s razor).
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:28 pm to mwade91383
quote:
Your algorithm feeding you more dribble (that you can’t eat fast enough) does not mean it’s getting one iota closer to being proven it’s a hoax. Sorry
you’ve used this line a couple times already now. It doesn’t bother me whatsoever. quote:
Not that it really matters
This is olympic gold medal level projection coming from the person ignoring all the very clear signs of this being a hoax. But keep doubling down my little friend, I’ll keep the receipts.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:29 pm to GRTiger
People like you keep responding to me. Do you want me to ignore them?
You could simply take your own advice and keep it moving.
You could simply take your own advice and keep it moving.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:29 pm to mwade91383
quote:
That is, unquestionably the most likely outcome (Occam’s razor).
If you’re trying to impress us with your use of big words, you might try some new material. You’ve used this line a dozen times in 2 days. It’s not the case.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:31 pm to Klark Kent
Of course I did. Your whole list of “evidence” was nothing more than internet innuendo from grifter types.
You’re the one pretending it’s something else.
You’re the one pretending it’s something else.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:32 pm to Klark Kent
You thinking it’s a big word tracks.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:32 pm to mwade91383
quote:
1) what % chance this is a hoax?
100%
quote:
2) what % chance we get legitimate proof and people suffer real consequences?
I see we’ve already started to move the goal posts. Clever. And regardless, if we got copies of actual receipts of payment or instruction email, you’d say it wasn’t from a legitimate source.
So, I’ll propose the next question: What type of evidence would be required for your biased brain to accept this is a hoax? (i know the answer, but at least try to sound reasonable)
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:33 pm to mwade91383
quote:
Of course I did. Your whole list of “evidence” was nothing more than internet innuendo from grifter types.
as in a video that has been spammed all over the internet of the actual event taking place?
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:36 pm to mwade91383
quote:
People like you keep responding to me. Do you want me to ignore them?
No, I want you fully engaged and speaking your truth from the chest.
quote:
You could simply take your own advice and keep it moving.
You misunderstand my goals for being here.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:36 pm to Klark Kent
How is that moving the goalposts? Isn’t that exactly what you’d want to happen? Isn’t the goal somebody facing consequences?
Or is it just to create a goofy internet narrative and nothing else?
Or is it just to create a goofy internet narrative and nothing else?
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News