- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:01 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
How many have been released promptly with little to no bail?
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:01 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I'm curious about the criteria used to determine which cities warrant a hostile military takeover.
"hostile military takeover"
Not all the cities. Just the lawless liberal shitholes who have been deliberately allowed to go to seed as career politicians make their livings embezzling public taxpayer funds.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:01 am to RollTide4547
quote:
I see a MAN a set of balls stepping up to LEAD and making the citizens safer. Which they are.
I'm just hoping you're only saying this because it's Trump. Hoping that you don't actually want the federal government to "keep citizens safe" by deploying the military to police US citizens.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:02 am to 4cubbies
quote:If the crime is low, murder rate is low and the citizens are Not afraid to walk the streets at night then I see no need to deploy the NG. So yes.
Are there any cities that you don't want to seer the NG deployed to?
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:02 am to 4cubbies
DOuble Post #3
This post was edited on 8/25/25 at 10:14 am
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:02 am to 4cubbies
Double post #2
This post was edited on 8/25/25 at 10:14 am
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:02 am to 4cubbies
Double post
This post was edited on 8/25/25 at 10:13 am
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:03 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Are there any cities that you don't want to seer the NG deployed to? I'm curious about the criteria used to determine which cities warrant a hostile military takeover.
I’m not sure if you’ve been perusing the board this morning but pretty much everyone here thinks I’m more liberal than you because I’m not for the deployment of troops to our cities for routine police work.(Natural disasters or major riots would be a different story)
But I do take issue with your use of the phrase “hostile military takeover.” That’s not how I would describe what’s happening.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:16 am to 4cubbies
quote:If the local politicians refuse to do their job (which most certainly is to keep the citizens of their community safe) I would hope that any and ALL American Presidents would step up and "assist" those areas with keeping the American citizens safe.
I'm just hoping you're only saying this because it's Trump. Hoping that you don't actually want the federal government to "keep citizens safe" by deploying the military to police US citizens.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:18 am to RollTide4547
quote:
If the local politicians refuse to do their job (which most certainly is to keep the citizens of their community safe) I would hope that any and ALL American Presidents would step up and "assist" those areas with keeping the American citizens safe.
Do you feel like the President of the United States should deploy military to police all cities or states with crime?
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:19 am to HeadCall
quote:
But I do take issue with your use of the phrase “hostile military takeover.” That’s not how I would describe what’s happening.
It's hostile because it wasn't invited by local authorities.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:20 am to RollTide4547
quote:
If the crime is low, murder rate is low and the citizens are Not afraid to walk the streets at night then I see no need to deploy the NG. So yes.
What is the definition of "low?"
Is evidence of people walking the streets at night enough to prove that citizens feel safe doing so?
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:22 am to 4cubbies
quote:
It's hostile because it wasn't invited by local authorities.
lol
What a snowflake
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:25 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Do you feel like the President of the United States should deploy military to police all cities or states with crime?
Any that lack the competence to police those jurisdictions themselves, absolutely.
This post was edited on 8/25/25 at 10:30 am
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:27 am to 4cubbies
quote:Actually the Military aren't "policing", they are providing support. Allowing police officers to actually "pollice" instead of working in the support roles.
Do you feel like the President of the United States should deploy military to police all cities or states with crime?
Again, if local elected officials refuse to do their job (which is protecting their citizens) then the Federals should most certainly step in and assist them.
This post was edited on 8/25/25 at 10:32 am
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:28 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Do you feel like the President of the United States should deploy military to police all cities or states with crime?
I have been vocal on this board for praising Governor Landry for deploying state troopers and national guardsmen to downtown New Orleans. This action has noticeably improved the touristy areas of the city.
Having seen the fruits of what such a policy can do even in a limited context, COUNT ME ALL THE WAY IN! Baton Rouge had 7 shootings Sunday morning. Our judges, police, and DA’s have abandoned the people to the criminal element. If they won’t do the jobs we elect them to do (because of political gerrymandering which keeps them in power while ensuring very few people get a real voice), bring in the troops. Arrest the judges. Arrest the mayors. Execute everyone involved in this nonsense. The chaos in our cities is 100% caused by corrupt government officials who refuse to do their jobs because they’re paid off to look the other way.
The same justice system that will find any excuse to fine you to oblivion will find ANY excuse to let a rapist or an armed robber go free. Any justice system which prioritizes window tint over rape is neither just nor a system which deserves to exist.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:29 am to 4cubbies
quote:
It's hostile because it wasn't invited by local authorities.
It’s DC, the federal government is the local authority.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:30 am to HeadCall
quote:This is a truth that liberals always want to skip over.
It’s DC, the federal government is the local authority.
Posted on 8/25/25 at 10:37 am to HeadCall
quote:
It’s DC, the federal government is the local authority.
This is true. It is not true of Chicago or NYC. If he sends the guard into those cities expect major pushback.
What about Houston? Now that is a city with high crime but no mention of it? Strange.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News