Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Roger Stone faces a gag order. | Page 3 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Roger Stone faces a gag order.

Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:06 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
136774 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Roger Stone faces a gag order.
Have to love that bullshite!

The man's home is assaulted like he's El Chappo on steroids, all on film. He's the perp walked on national TV.

WTF does Amy Berman Jackson think that was all about?

She is an effing Judge for chrissakes! Innocent until proven guilty and all that rot ..... but meanwhile, let's strongly imply guilt to the jury pool.
Then gag the defendant.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
41456 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Gag orders are appropriate when out of court statements can taint the jury pool.

This may be true in theory, but is patently false in practice. Law enforcement has contacts in almost every news station in America. Additionally, the news media reports on pending criminal cases largely from facts obtained in public charging documents or information provided by those working for the prosecution, both of which provide only one side of the story. A gag order generally only silences one side and it isn't the prosecution.
Posted by tigerpawl
Can't get there from here.
Member since Dec 2003
22628 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Roger Stone faces a gag order.


Posted by nuwaydawg
Member since Nov 2007
2174 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Did he waive the jury? Why wouldn’t it be tried before a jury unless he waived it?


Her name is Amy. Sorry for being obtuse. You never know these days.

Other than that, I have clue what you are talking about.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84904 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:28 pm to
He’s facing criminal charges and has a right to a trial by jury. He can waive the jury and have the judge decide whether he’s guilty or not. If he has waived the jury then I think your point about a gag order to not taint the jury pool gets a little stronger- there would be no jury to taint.

I had not read that he waived the jury and he has not waived it as far as I know.
Posted by nuwaydawg
Member since Nov 2007
2174 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:32 pm to
My bad. I was erroneously thinking this was some kangaroo court bullshite where he had to testify in front of a congressional hearing.
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
31790 posts
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

I hope she orders one for JJbot’s sake

was coming in to say that JJ looks like he will be vindicated on this one

I am on another political board 7 I made the mistake of running with one of his threads over there from either GP or DC

I refuse to use those as sources, they are correct sometimes, but they always over hype and get proven wrong a lot

I hate looking bad, even on an anonymous message board...
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram