- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Roger Stone faces a gag order.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:06 pm to Jbird
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:06 pm to Jbird
quote:Have to love that bullshite!
Roger Stone faces a gag order.
The man's home is assaulted like he's El Chappo on steroids, all on film. He's the perp walked on national TV.
WTF does Amy Berman Jackson think that was all about?
She is an effing Judge for chrissakes! Innocent until proven guilty and all that rot ..... but meanwhile, let's strongly imply guilt to the jury pool.
Then gag the defendant.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:09 pm to VOR
quote:
Gag orders are appropriate when out of court statements can taint the jury pool.
This may be true in theory, but is patently false in practice. Law enforcement has contacts in almost every news station in America. Additionally, the news media reports on pending criminal cases largely from facts obtained in public charging documents or information provided by those working for the prosecution, both of which provide only one side of the story. A gag order generally only silences one side and it isn't the prosecution.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:15 pm to Jbird
quote:
Roger Stone faces a gag order.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:17 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Did he waive the jury? Why wouldn’t it be tried before a jury unless he waived it?
Her name is Amy. Sorry for being obtuse. You never know these days.
Other than that, I have clue what you are talking about.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:28 pm to nuwaydawg
He’s facing criminal charges and has a right to a trial by jury. He can waive the jury and have the judge decide whether he’s guilty or not. If he has waived the jury then I think your point about a gag order to not taint the jury pool gets a little stronger- there would be no jury to taint.
I had not read that he waived the jury and he has not waived it as far as I know.
I had not read that he waived the jury and he has not waived it as far as I know.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:32 pm to boosiebadazz
My bad. I was erroneously thinking this was some kangaroo court bullshite where he had to testify in front of a congressional hearing.
Posted on 1/30/19 at 4:40 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:was coming in to say that JJ looks like he will be vindicated on this one
I hope she orders one for JJbot’s sake
I am on another political board 7 I made the mistake of running with one of his threads over there from either GP or DC
I refuse to use those as sources, they are correct sometimes, but they always over hype and get proven wrong a lot
I hate looking bad, even on an anonymous message board...
Popular
Back to top


0







