- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Russia says any peacekeeping troops must be from Non NATO Countries
Posted on 3/16/25 at 10:46 pm to John Barron
Posted on 3/16/25 at 10:46 pm to John Barron
thats has nothing to do with peacekeeping forces u stupid twat
Posted on 3/16/25 at 11:58 pm to John Barron
The Swedes, the Austrians and the Swiss. Perhaps the Pope will loan a few of the Swiss Guards. Maybe some Georgians and Moldovans, too.
This post was edited on 3/17/25 at 12:01 am
Posted on 3/17/25 at 2:01 am to ned nederlander
quote:
Mujahideen soldiers from Afghanistan would be the best choice.
The mujahideen is the Taliban. Yea, let’s give Ukraine to the Taliban.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 3:32 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Even if you leave that point aside. NATO has been exclusively supplying one side with weapons, planes, armored vehicles and intelligence.
NATO soldiers in Ukraine wouldn’t be peacekeepers, they would be enemy combatants.
NATO soldiers in Ukraine wouldn’t be peacekeepers, they would be enemy combatants.
Posted on 3/17/25 at 10:12 am to Raz
quote:
NATO soldiers in Ukraine wouldn’t be peacekeepers, they would be enemy combatants.
If you're Russian. Are you Russian?
Popular
Back to top


0







