- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sarah Silverman on Abortion
Posted on 1/24/14 at 5:42 am to northshorebamaman
Posted on 1/24/14 at 5:42 am to northshorebamaman
quote:Interesting perspective as it is an issue which apparently necessitates her noting it continually. Got it?
If you're an anti-Semite, just say it. Don't beat around the bush. Does your opinion on her necessitate noting her ethnicity?
Certainly anti-semite as an invective is something new in my case, even for this board. It is a uniquely odd insertion when applied to pointing out what SS thrives on in her every appearance. While I am not antisemetic, I am definitively antibimbo where attention-seeking public proclamations are involved. In that sense, a Jewish shock comedienne, one who claims for example to have grown up in a home with no religion, yet has a rabbi sibling and a father who publicly calls her out for wearing a cross, certainly seems to qualify.
2
Posted on 1/24/14 at 5:44 am to Vegas Bengal
quote:VB, she has a looooooooooong history. It makes its own implications.
you're implying no restrictions. She SAID nothing about no restrictions.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 5:45 am to NC_Tigah
11 pages, she is unworthy of this kind of attention and really is not that funny. 
Posted on 1/24/14 at 7:08 am to NC_Tigah
You said:
She specifically made fun of the "what is life" debate and the access hurdles....so still i really don't see how specifically or tangentially or by implication she made fun of infanticide. It seems you really just don't like "Jewish bitches" more than anything else...have you always been an anti-Semite?
quote:
You seem to find odd solace in this instance of a Jewish bitch making light of issues up to and including infanticide
She specifically made fun of the "what is life" debate and the access hurdles....so still i really don't see how specifically or tangentially or by implication she made fun of infanticide. It seems you really just don't like "Jewish bitches" more than anything else...have you always been an anti-Semite?
Posted on 1/24/14 at 7:12 am to cwill
quote:
It seems you really just don't like "Jewish bitches" more than anything else...have you always been an anti-Semite?
I saw no legitimate reason why he would include "Jewish" in his condemnation, either. I'm blaming a medical condition, though.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 7:37 am to cwill
quote:Well, considering the post your response links to, pretty clearly you were thinking of the following:
...so still i really don't see how specifically or tangentially or by implication she made fun of infanticide. It seems you really just don't like "Jewish bitches" more than anything else...have you always been an anti-Semite?
quote:Actually I'm surprised at the feaux consternation from some circles here. After all, Rex supports infanticide. Do you?
Did she advocate for restrictions on abortion?
I didn't see anything resembling that position.
Nope.
She advocated for abortion.
That's it.
Period.
Nothing less.
No qualifications.
No exceptions.
Now you can argue this Jewish bimbo is too stupid to fully comprehend what advocacy of unfettered abortion really means. But she clearly strains to have her audience assume otherwise.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 7:39 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
After all, Rex supports infanticide.
I'm certain that I get lied about more than any other poster on this site.
Why do you feel the need?
Posted on 1/24/14 at 7:46 am to Rex
quote:Ah, well I'd certainly not lie. Perhaps I'm mistaken though. At what point would you restrict a woman's right to abortion Rex? 24wks? 30wks? 40wks? During labor? At crowning? Please elucidate.
I'm certain that I get lied about more than any other poster on this site.
Why do you feel the need?
This post was edited on 1/24/14 at 7:47 am
Posted on 1/24/14 at 7:49 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
At what point would you restrict a woman's right abortion Rex?
I've always said that Roe v. Wade is one of the finest bits of adjudication ever rendered by the US Supreme Court.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 9:21 am to anc
The only reason I would support abortion would be if we could go back in time and abort people like Sarah Silverman.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 9:57 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
a Jewish shock comedienne,
I wonder what exactly in any way does her religious background have to do with your fervent dislike of her.
oh, wait.
You're one of those.
That's disappointing.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:01 am to Rex
quote:
I've always said that Roe v. Wade is one of the finest bits of adjudication ever rendered by the US Supreme Court.
agreed
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:01 am to CITWTT
quote:
Being the lesbian she is there is nothing for her to worry about re pregnancy.
She's not a lesbo.
quote:
I read earlier on Drudge that a lesbian couple is suing the sperm donor for child support payments and the judge has decreed that yes he should.
You have that wrong too. The lesbo couple says the man had nothing to do with the child. The STATE is going after him, not the couple.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:03 am to asurob1
quote:Wait!
I wonder what exactly in any way does her religious background have to do with your fervent dislike of her.
You've arrived late to the troll party.
Apparently you missed the part where her religious background actually has nothing to do with her religious background
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:03 am to Vegas Bengal
quote:
quote:
Being the lesbian she is.
I'm sure Jimmy Kimmel would be surprised by your "insight".
and
This post was edited on 1/24/14 at 10:07 am
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:07 am to Rex
quote:Odd, given the opportunity to clear this up, you'd choose to dodge instead.
I'm certain that I get lied about more than any other poster on this site.
Why do you feel the need?quote:I've always said that Roe v. Wade is one of the finest bits of adjudication ever rendered by the US Supreme Court.
Ah, well I'd certainly not lie. Perhaps I'm mistaken though. At what point would you restrict a woman's right to abortion Rex? 24wks? 30wks? 40wks? During labor? At crowning? Please elucidate.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:44 am to NC_Tigah
I didn't dodge. Are you ignorant of Roe v. Wade?
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:49 am to NC_Tigah
You've gone off the rails pal.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 10:59 am to Rex
quote:Perhaps you didn't intend to, but you did.
I didn't dodge.
Roe provides allowances for abortions. Not restrictions of them. I asked you about restrictions of abortions. Different issue.
E.g., Barbara Boxer's view of maternal rights to terminate a pregnancy extend far beyond Roe, though your previous response could be identical to hers regarding Roe v Wade.
Posted on 1/24/14 at 11:00 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Roe provides allowances for abortions. Not restrictions of them.
Yes, I can see you're ignorant of Roe v. Wade.
Page 11 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News