- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/22/23 at 5:05 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:.... or the infinite existence of matter. We've established it was King James, no?
Who made the Christian god?
Posted on 9/22/23 at 5:06 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
I don't. Do you?
I do not. I want facts on top of facts to check facts that I am questioning.
I always kick the tires before buying.
This post was edited on 9/22/23 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 9/22/23 at 5:10 pm to NCIS_76
quote:NO!
They call it science, but deep down it was experimental science
Your reference is to nothing remotely scientific. Your reference is to nothing remotely related to the scientific method.
Your reference is to political bullshite cloaked in the name of science.
Posted on 9/22/23 at 5:13 pm to NCIS_76
quote:Very wise in today's environment.
I always kick the tires before buying.
Posted on 9/22/23 at 5:15 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
... or the infinite existence of matter. We've established it was King James, no?
Sure, why not.
Posted on 9/22/23 at 5:16 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Your reference is to political bull shite cloaked in the name of science.
Sounds like someone's religion is going through a phase. I mean science.
Posted on 9/22/23 at 5:16 pm to NCIS_76
quote:
I do not. I want facts on top of facts to check facts that I am questioning.
Well, there you go.
Eventually, folks always come around to making my points for me.
Posted on 9/22/23 at 5:32 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Eventually, folks always come around to making my points for me.
Back off. You are drinking too much.
Posted on 9/22/23 at 5:35 pm to NCIS_76
quote:
You are drinking too much.
Posted on 9/22/23 at 5:38 pm to Herooftheday
quote:I prefer chess to cards, but ...
Sounds like someone's religion is going through a phase. I mean science.
Go Fish!
Posted on 9/22/23 at 5:40 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Uh oh.
Sure, why not.
You okay?
Posted on 9/22/23 at 5:44 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Your reference is to political bullshite cloaked in the name of science.
Actually leftist politicians picked up experimental science and run from it today. You got pissed and wet your panties.
It becomes political when the government makes it my business You are damn sure right.
This post was edited on 9/22/23 at 5:49 pm
Posted on 9/22/23 at 5:55 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
You okay?
Weird question, bro.
Posted on 9/22/23 at 6:00 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Perhaps for the same reason a Trump-supporting Grandma who innocently wandered onto Capitol Hill on J6 doesn't think she committed domestic terrorism?
Look, you're either claiming that we have unbroken historical evidence going back to the first cell, or you're looking at more recent evidence and extrapolating backwards. This isn't an opinion on what the word means; it's what the word means and it's what you're doing. Why can't you (and others) admit it? Why claim it's a "proven fact"?
The grandma analogy is awful.
quote:
I asked you (a bright guy) a very simple question .... Considering the FACTS, what is your hypothesis?
Even though you're avoiding mine I'll answer anyway. It looks like random mutation has some limitations, and Chance of the Gaps isn't any more persuasive to me than God of the Gaps. An agent directing the mutations looks much more likely, meaning they're not random, meaning that does NOT fit with the religion of evolution as we know it.
Posted on 9/22/23 at 6:25 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Seriously?
Did you read the ridiculousness of the post to which I was replying? He was basically dismissing the scientific method as Democratic bullshite. That really should have ended the thread.
And I'm sorry if you say "gender" when you really mean "sex". I remember a time when people only referred to "gender" in English class. They would say "sex" when they meant sex. They weren't so confused back then.
But just a refresher for you:
Gender is masculine and feminine.
Sex is male and female.
It's not complicated. I don't know why you would have problems with it, unless you suffer from some personal issues.
Posted on 9/22/23 at 6:32 pm to LSUbest
quote:
That leads back to holes in the fossil records AKA missing links.
So what? The fossil "record" isn't some kind of comprehensive archive that exists for the edification of mankind. It is a rare natural phenomenon that captures organisms from different eras. Some eras provide more fossils, some less. Some past environments provide more fossils, some less.
There's no guarantee that every single type of organism is going to be represented in the fossil record. Very few would be.
Posted on 9/22/23 at 7:04 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
Is this the part of the thread where we start confusing gender with sex?
Until very recently it's been used the same as sex. It's old definition was sex. When someone asks your gender they aren't asking your perception of yourself. You can confuse it if you want but gender is sex.
Posted on 9/22/23 at 7:11 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Who made the Christian god?
Good question, I don't believe in that, but if you do then you need to ponder it. The best evidence an intelligent design hypothesis ever got was the big bang theory - even though at the time it was celebrated as proof of no god.
That's why Einstein and other top thinkers, before and after him, wanted to push solid state so bad.
Posted on 9/22/23 at 7:27 pm to philter
I'm just fine with "we don't know."
Page 26 of 35
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News