- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/31/26 at 11:53 am to AlterEd
quote:
The ages of the girls is well established, a-hole.
Pot.it then. Two underaged girls. The rest is YOUR pedo fantasy. PEDO Ed.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 12:04 pm to shinerfan
Not hard to do at all. Takes about 1 minute of time.
Link to indictment docs
"Dozens of underage girls"
I would ask if you're going to apologize for your completely unnecessary and inflammatory remarks, but we all know you won't. You're a sick motherfricker.
And even if it was only 2, what then? Is that somehow ok? Why are you defending pedophiles?
Link to indictment docs
"Dozens of underage girls"
I would ask if you're going to apologize for your completely unnecessary and inflammatory remarks, but we all know you won't. You're a sick motherfricker.
And even if it was only 2, what then? Is that somehow ok? Why are you defending pedophiles?
This post was edited on 1/31/26 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 1/31/26 at 12:30 pm to AlterEd
Damnit Ed.
In the hierarchy of nuclear level horrors:
1) actual pedophiles sexually abusing prepubescent children.
Everything thing else.
Stop screaming nazi and Gestapo at us Ed. Its a bad look. Not agreeing with you about “pedophiles” (because it’s true) instantly, in your mind, equates to “defending pedophiles” - you are actively being the equivalent of an old white liberal retard woman in a puffer jacket slapping ICE on the street with a purse, Ed.
Ask yourself why you want to allow actual pedophiles to claim they are in the same company as this reality? “Yeah, I had sex with those 5 year old children, but everyone having sex with underage girls is a pedophile. Just put me on the sex offender list, we are all the same” - this is what you are doing.
In the hierarchy of nuclear level horrors:
1) actual pedophiles sexually abusing prepubescent children.
Everything thing else.
Stop screaming nazi and Gestapo at us Ed. Its a bad look. Not agreeing with you about “pedophiles” (because it’s true) instantly, in your mind, equates to “defending pedophiles” - you are actively being the equivalent of an old white liberal retard woman in a puffer jacket slapping ICE on the street with a purse, Ed.
Ask yourself why you want to allow actual pedophiles to claim they are in the same company as this reality? “Yeah, I had sex with those 5 year old children, but everyone having sex with underage girls is a pedophile. Just put me on the sex offender list, we are all the same” - this is what you are doing.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 12:40 pm to rocksteady
Shut the frick up with this shite.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 12:41 pm to Cosmo
Or, the victims could tell us what happened.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 12:42 pm to AlterEd
It’s true.
Maybe the other guy was right about your pedo fantasies - because I see someone trying desperately to move pedophilia adjacent to under age, and it’s bizarre.
Unfortunately that makes more sense considering the effort being put in. Don’t be what you hate, Ed
Maybe the other guy was right about your pedo fantasies - because I see someone trying desperately to move pedophilia adjacent to under age, and it’s bizarre.
Unfortunately that makes more sense considering the effort being put in. Don’t be what you hate, Ed
Posted on 1/31/26 at 12:44 pm to rocksteady
quote:
Maybe the other guy was right about your pedo fantasies - because I see someone trying desperately to move pedophilia adjacent to under age, and it’s bizarre.
Exactly what I said initially. This guy thinks it's ok if they're 14 because they aren't prepubescent and therefore it's not technically pedophilia.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 12:45 pm to AlterEd
Where did he say it’s OK?
I genuinely didn’t read what he said outside of the one post you quoted a couple pages ago, but I’ll wager large sums of money he never said sex trafficking 14 year old girls is OK.
Want to wager?
I genuinely didn’t read what he said outside of the one post you quoted a couple pages ago, but I’ll wager large sums of money he never said sex trafficking 14 year old girls is OK.
Want to wager?
Posted on 1/31/26 at 4:05 pm to AlterEd
Popular
Back to top

0




