- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump federal trial on election interference set for March 4, 2024
Posted on 8/28/23 at 11:30 am to LSUvet72
Posted on 8/28/23 at 11:30 am to LSUvet72
quote:
Going to be dismissed by SCOTUS as being violative of first amendment free speech right
They don't care as long as it's after they take Trump out.
Posted on 8/28/23 at 11:33 am to LSUvet72
quote:
Going to be dismissed by SCOTUS as being violative of first amendment free speech right
Democrats would love nothing more than for SCOTUS to step in so they can use as justification to pack the court.
OTOH, if they SCOTUS doesn’t step in, who else can stop this madness?
Posted on 8/28/23 at 11:40 am to Covingtontiger77
That’s not even close to being the only way. If 10 percent of the republican base, say 5 million minimum, use their collective power daily to strain government resources or protests to take over state regional hubs you’d get plenty of attention. If Republicans would use lawfare better than democrats this shitt would end. If regular Republicans would hound their respective political leaders this would have them on hot seats. But you are correct in the sense that no even 1/100th of us do a damn thing
Posted on 8/28/23 at 11:41 am to Motownsix
quote:
Trump wouldn’t be running for office if he didn’t think that was his best option to avoid jail.
Posted on 8/28/23 at 11:48 am to jatilen
quote:
That's the date Jack requested and the judge unsurprisingly gave it to him.
Maybe that will be used as an example of election interference in the trial by Trumps lawyers.
Posted on 8/28/23 at 11:49 am to NCIS_76
Be sure to send him more money
He will use it wisely
He will use it wisely
Posted on 8/28/23 at 12:19 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
All you can do is Vote accordingly until such time as enough of us are willing to lose our AC filled homes and streaming services washing over us and you know actually do something. And by something I mean North/South type something. Only this time it’s along political lines. We would need tens of millions willing to give up their comfortable lives before this comes to be. And I don’t see this happening. Americans are fat, soft, and just want cold AC and Netflix. Not looking to sacrifice this to go Wolverine on some progs and uniparty shitheads. We won’t do shite and we will just go to work and bitch and moan on TD.
This pretty much sums up most Americans on both sides of the aisle. I’m ashamed I ever served in the military. The people
Here are no longer worth dying for!
Posted on 8/28/23 at 12:20 pm to Robin Masters
The day before Super Tuesday.
The attack on this Republic is not only very real, but it is there for all to see with eyes to see.
The attack on this Republic is not only very real, but it is there for all to see with eyes to see.
Posted on 8/28/23 at 1:45 pm to LSUvet72
Agreed…I say go ahead and have the trial.
Defense shouldn’t put up any witnesses as no crimes occurred.
Lets DC Dems jury find him guilty which they surely will then do an emergency appeal (similar to 2000 election) to scotus which they will 100% accept and overturn the conviction.
Defense shouldn’t put up any witnesses as no crimes occurred.
Lets DC Dems jury find him guilty which they surely will then do an emergency appeal (similar to 2000 election) to scotus which they will 100% accept and overturn the conviction.
Posted on 8/28/23 at 1:46 pm to LSUvet72
quote:
Going to be dismissed by SCOTUS as being violative of first amendment free speech right
How you figure? Where’s the first amendment violation?
This post was edited on 8/28/23 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 8/28/23 at 1:46 pm to masoncj
quote:
Lets DC Dems jury find him guilty which they surely will then do an emergency appeal (similar to 2000 election) to scotus which they will 100% accept and overturn the conviction.
If you guys think SCOTUS is going to overturn criminal convictions in this case, y’all are beyond delusional.
Posted on 8/28/23 at 1:48 pm to Giantkiller
quote:
I can't believe I live in a USA that can and will now do shite like this. But here we are.
This is what we deserve, for running a guy who shut the country down over a flu
Posted on 8/28/23 at 1:49 pm to Indefatigable
Get ready to cry some more…you really don’t think they are going to uphold a conviction in a jury pool that votes 95% democrat
Who is being delusional?!
Who is being delusional?!
Posted on 8/28/23 at 1:51 pm to masoncj
quote:
Get ready to cry some more…you really don’t think they are going to uphold a conviction in a jury pool that votes 95% democrat Who is being delusional?!
So what’s the legal basis? Remember that the jury pool voting differently than the defendant is nowhere close to grounds for overturning a conviction.
Posted on 8/28/23 at 1:52 pm to Indefatigable
Of course it is …not arguing with you …trolls are out today for sure
Posted on 8/28/23 at 1:53 pm to masoncj
quote:
Of course it is
Cite?
quote:
not arguing with you
Of course you aren’t
Posted on 8/28/23 at 1:54 pm to Robin Masters
This should be close to Kracken time.
Can’t wait.

Can’t wait.
Posted on 8/28/23 at 1:56 pm to masoncj
quote:
Get ready to cry some more…you really don’t think they are going to uphold a conviction in a jury pool that votes 95% democrat Who is being delusional?!
The same prosecutor got slapped down 9-0 by the US Supreme Court the last time he launched a politically motivated prosecution.
Anyone that thinks they know for a fact what is going to happen is uninformed. I tend to agree with you the Supreme Court would rule for Trump, but who knows.
This post was edited on 8/28/23 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 8/28/23 at 2:00 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Remember that the jury pool voting differently than the defendant is nowhere close to grounds for overturning a conviction.
I’m not sure that it’s possible for a conservative to get a fair shake in prog infested areas like DC.
I’d not like to find out.
Popular
Back to top


0





