- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: VP Pence Physcian Behind Ronny Jackson Attacks
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:03 pm to JudgeHolden
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:03 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
But you’ve still don’t know the credibility of the declarant!
She has earned the trust that she, as a real journalist, knows the credibility of the declarant. This is not a court of law. You are an idiot.
0
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:03 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Don’t think that’s true.
Why did my post get whacked? It wasn't even controversial...
This post was edited on 4/30/18 at 7:05 pm
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:04 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Your syllogism is this:
Sara Carter has used unnamed sources.
She was always right when she did.
Therefore she is right now.
Forget the “past performance doesn’t guarantee future results” causal flaw.
(It’s a problem.)
You posit that premise two is true just because you say so.
So show me.
Sara Carter has used unnamed sources.
She was always right when she did.
Therefore she is right now.
Forget the “past performance doesn’t guarantee future results” causal flaw.
(It’s a problem.)
You posit that premise two is true just because you say so.
So show me.
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:05 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
unless you got a real track record for her
ding, ding, ding
before you ask, do your own homework.
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:07 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
This is the board’s usual idiotic response.
“It’s true!”
Response: But things are not true just because you say so.
“Do your own homework!”
That’s some lazy arse thinking, you causeway clown.
“It’s true!”
Response: But things are not true just because you say so.
“Do your own homework!”
That’s some lazy arse thinking, you causeway clown.
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:07 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Your syllogism is this:
Sara Carter has used unnamed sources.
She was always right when she did.
Therefore she is right now.
I didnt imply that, you inferred it.
What I DID say is that unnamed sources are more acceptable from someone who has been consistently right then they are from someone who is consistently wrong.
At NO point did I say that Sarah Carter was definitely right THIS time.
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:09 pm to JudgeHolden
boosie, stop using big words before polly pixie lover signs on and wants your digits.
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:11 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
I agree with you there. And in fairness, I can see how you might trust a journalist you follow more than one you don’t. But you are also more likely to remember when she’s right more than when she’s wrong once you are invested.
I genuinely appreciate your candor. It’s better than the usual bluster here.
I genuinely appreciate your candor. It’s better than the usual bluster here.
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:11 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
You misspelled transferred to the worst station the Army has to offer
Thule.
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:12 pm to JudgeHolden
Depending on how the CSA (Chief of Staff, Army) wants to view this situation, this Army doc could be up for Article 107 False Official Statement. That would automatically lead to Article 134 Conduct Unbecoming an Officer. But Art 134 could be on the table as a stand alone. And yes, that could be courts martial material.
Trump is CIC and can dismiss this Army doc from service entirely, but that doc would get retirement and all that. The other they can do is have an administrative hearing to entertain the equivalent of those two articles, but with a lower burden of proof - if guilty they can recommend separation for misconduct which could lead to loss of pension, depending on the circumstances.
If this is true, however, I would expect to see an official reprimand from Trump and from the CSA, and then the unceremonious retirement of this doctor.
Trump is CIC and can dismiss this Army doc from service entirely, but that doc would get retirement and all that. The other they can do is have an administrative hearing to entertain the equivalent of those two articles, but with a lower burden of proof - if guilty they can recommend separation for misconduct which could lead to loss of pension, depending on the circumstances.
If this is true, however, I would expect to see an official reprimand from Trump and from the CSA, and then the unceremonious retirement of this doctor.
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:15 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
That dude isn't an attorney LOL
Understood.
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:16 pm to starsandstripes
quote:
Depending on how the CSA (Chief of Staff, Army) wants to view this situation, this Army doc could be up for Article 107 False Official Statement. That would automatically lead to Article 134 Conduct Unbecoming an Officer. But Art 134 could be on the table as a stand alone. And yes, that could be courts martial material.
Trump is CIC and can dismiss this Army doc from service entirely, but that doc would get retirement and all that. The other they can do is have an administrative hearing to entertain the equivalent of those two articles, but with a lower burden of proof - if guilty they can recommend separation for misconduct which could lead to loss of pension, depending on the circumstances.
If this is true, however, I would expect to see an official reprimand from Trump and from the CSA, and then the unceremonious retirement of this doctor.
She won't be prosecuted for taking a complaint to the Senate. And transferring her to some shite hole and making sure she never gets another promotion is where her life is headed. She just ended her own career.
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:16 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
“Do your own homework!” That’s some lazy arse thinking, you causeway clown.
So I'm lazy because I will not "prove" my theory, but you are not lazy because you will not prove your theory that Sarah Carter's unnamed sources are not any better than anyone else's?
Got it.
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:18 pm to Iowa Golfer
quote:
Or something is obvious.
Yeah? What’s that, farm boy?
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:21 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
So I'm lazy because I will not "prove" my theory, but you are not lazy because you will not prove your theory that Sarah Carter's unnamed sources are not any better than anyone else's?
Got it.
Uh what? If someone said "Sid is a liar" the onus would be on them to prove that. Literally no one would be like "Hey Sid, that guy says you lie, you need to prove you don't lie"
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:22 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
Burden is on the asserter. That’s pretty well understood.
Otherwise the argument is just “you should believe this reporter because I do.”
Otherwise the argument is just “you should believe this reporter because I do.”
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:22 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
Judge is an uneducated lazy alter and a troll, his response in this thread confirms that 100%. The dumbass will be banned soon, and it’s well deserved
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:23 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Burden is on the asserter. That’s pretty well understood.
That's true, that is why I used the example. If someone said you are dishonest, they must prove it. You don't have to prove you are not.
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:23 pm to Iowa Golfer
quote:
You on the Internet? You have Google in your backward arse hick town? Google it Barrister. Or have your paralegal do it for you tomorrow, and bill someone for it. It's obvious you're an attorney. Or something is obvious
How the frick did that clown pass the bar? He's obviously as dumb as a rock.
Posted on 4/30/18 at 7:24 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
She won't be prosecuted for taking a complaint to the Senate.
There is a huge difference between a complaint and a pack of lies. So far it appears she brought forth lies. And this isn't the typical high ranking officer stuff they can sweep under the rug. It's in the news cycle, it adversely affected another officer, and it makes the Army look bad.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News