Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us User Profile: cajunangelle | TigerDroppings.com
Favorite team:New Orleans Saints 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:164250
Registered on:10/22/2012
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
We could just grab up an Amish dude and stick them in there :lol:
Even Trump didn't want to bother going down the candy crazy train :lol: I wish the reporter asked him about her.
Don't forget ErErErErErErEr

It has been quite strange since my best FREN fourteen **** and counting And I agree more and more...
I really want to know does Qatar pay in gold bars Or US currency direct deposited?
I also Would bet kicking out China as the Grand Pooh Bah of the Panama Canal is a BFD.
And there you have it.... Now let's move on and discuss Wolfhound's thread. If it is a bunch of crap we're all FUCT...
CALMITH DOWNITH
quote:

@GROK


Historically, the United Kingdom played a central role in providing marine insurance for global shipping, particularly through institutions like Lloyd's of London, which originated in the late 17th century as a hub for underwriting risks associated with maritime trade.

This system supported Britain's vast empire and naval dominance during the era known as Pax Britannica (roughly 1815–1914), where the Royal Navy effectively guaranteed safe passage for international shipping lanes, enforcing free trade and protecting against piracy and threats.

The UK also subsidized or influenced convoys and protections during major conflicts, such as the Napoleonic Wars, to safeguard commerce.

lloyds.com

In essence, the UK "paid for" these guarantees through its naval expenditures and economic influence, which underwrote global trade security. The UK largely ceased this role after World War II due to economic exhaustion, the costs of maintaining a global empire, and decolonization efforts. The 1956 Suez Crisis highlighted Britain's diminished power, as it could no longer unilaterally enforce control over key trade routes without U.S. support.

the-independent.com

Global naval dominance shifted to the United States under Pax Americana, where the U.S. Navy became the primary guarantor of secure shipping lanes worldwide.

Today, marine insurance is primarily handled by private global markets (e.g., Lloyd's of London still leads in this space, alongside firms like AXA XL and Gallagher).

global.lockton.com +1

Security for shipping lanes is provided by a combination of international coalitions (e.g., via the International Maritime Organization) and major navies, with the U.S. Navy playing the dominant role in high-risk areas like the Persian Gulf.

supplychaindigital.com

Private maritime security firms (e.g., Hart Maritime, Seagull Maritime Security) also offer armed escorts and risk assessments for specific voyages.

marineinsight.com

Regarding President Trump's statement (posted today on Truth Social, which integrates with X): He announced that the U.S. would provide political risk insurance and guarantees for all maritime trade—especially energy shipments—through the Gulf, via the U.S. Development Finance Corporation (DFC) at a low cost, with potential U.S. Navy escorts if needed.

maritime-executive.com +1

This effectively means "we [the U.S.] will do it" in the context of stepping in to backstop shipping risks. The reason is to address disruptions in the Persian Gulf (e.g., from Iranian attacks or blockades), where private insurers have withdrawn war risk coverage, causing oil prices to spike and threatening global energy supplies.

argusmedia.com +1

By offering government-backed insurance and security, the U.S. aims to stabilize trade flows and prevent economic fallout.

Don't forget the long legged Mack daddy was spotted coming out a British intelligence building... and tea with the Prime Minister Before the arrests...

Also In before RFK TigerDOC And Pai Pai & all dweebs that defended Obama's Iran deal & actually believed Obama's Arab Spring
@GROK

quote:

Historically, the United Kingdom played a central role in providing marine insurance for global shipping, particularly through institutions like Lloyd's of London, which originated in the late 17th century as a hub for underwriting risks associated with maritime trade.

usni.org

This system supported Britain's vast empire and naval dominance during the era known as Pax Britannica (roughly 1815–1914), where the Royal Navy effectively guaranteed safe passage for international shipping lanes, enforcing free trade and protecting against piracy and threats.

swissre.com

The UK also subsidized or influenced convoys and protections during major conflicts, such as the Napoleonic Wars, to safeguard commerce.

lloyds.com

In essence, the UK "paid for" these guarantees through its naval expenditures and economic influence, which underwrote global trade security.The UK largely ceased this role after World War II due to economic exhaustion, the costs of maintaining a global empire, and decolonization efforts. The 1956 Suez Crisis highlighted Britain's diminished power, as it could no longer unilaterally enforce control over key trade routes without U.S. support.

the-independent.com

Global naval dominance shifted to the United States under Pax Americana, where the U.S. Navy became the primary guarantor of secure shipping lanes worldwide.

reddit.com

Today, marine insurance is primarily handled by private global markets (e.g., Lloyd's of London still leads in this space, alongside firms like AXA XL and Gallagher).

global.lockton.com +1

Security for shipping lanes is provided by a combination of international coalitions (e.g., via the International Maritime Organization) and major navies, with the U.S. Navy playing the dominant role in high-risk areas like the Persian Gulf.

supplychaindigital.com

Private maritime security firms (e.g., Hart Maritime, Seagull Maritime Security) also offer armed escorts and risk assessments for specific voyages.

marineinsight.com

Regarding President Trump's statement (posted today on Truth Social, which integrates with X): He announced that the U.S. would provide political risk insurance and guarantees for all maritime trade—especially energy shipments—through the Gulf, via the U.S. Development Finance Corporation (DFC) at a low cost, with potential U.S. Navy escorts if needed.

maritime-executive.com +1

This effectively means "we [the U.S.] will do it" in the context of stepping in to backstop shipping risks. The reason is to address disruptions in the Persian Gulf (e.g., from Iranian attacks or blockades), where private insurers have withdrawn war risk coverage, causing oil prices to spike and threatening global energy supplies.

argusmedia.com +1

By offering government-backed insurance and security, the U.S. aims to stabilize trade flows and prevent economic fallout.
Why were the two people arrested in the UK? Including A Prince of the United Kingdom?

Why was there a cable of a meeting with Prince Andrew involved... of all people clearly stating the game of global politics In regards to Tehran?

Why did London lead the charge to lock up Julian Assange for Wikileaks when it was Wikileaks that leaked Tehran and Prince Andrew?

I thought you said you were in the gifted class?

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
This is your favorite thread.... Just wait until you watch this. It deserves its own thread.



Evidence of wolfhounds video thread that the UK are dirty and want Iran to slush from and control.

The navy has been using Diego Garcia for 40 years.

The EU is the boogeyman.
They want a king and sharia law with booze for the weathy tourists.

They will be voted out. There is only so long the chamber of commerce and business round table can rule the USA.

DONT GET PISSED AND VOTE DEMOCRAT by sitting out elections. IT WILL BE FAR FAR WORSE. .
Why is he screaming dem talking points and IGNORING IDs to vote?