- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We have nothing in common.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 3:10 pm to Korkstand
Posted on 9/25/19 at 3:10 pm to Korkstand
quote:
It takes a really dishonest motherfricker to edit a quote like that. It does not say "...remove the fear of deportation.", it says "...remove the fear of deportation for Dreamers and their parents."
I'll give you three guesses as to what "Dreamers" parents are, dumbfrick. Care to take a stab at it?
2
Posted on 9/25/19 at 3:12 pm to troyt37
quote:
I'll give you three guesses as to what "Dreamers" parents are, dumbfrick. Care to take a stab at it?
Here. I'll help.
I'll spot him some letters.
I L L E G A L I M M I G R A N
Hopefully, he can guess the last 2.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 3:14 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Perfect example of my entire point in this thread. You frickers push the left further left than they really are. Trying to pass off an edited quote as "direct". LO fricking L
It was cut off on my computer screen, dumbfrick. Nothing nefarious. I had to click over to another page of socialist propaganda, and back to it, to see the whole thing. The point is moot, regardless, since your assertion is that Puto would deport illegals, and Dreamers parents are in fact criminal illegals.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 3:35 pm to troyt37
quote:
Congratulations! You graduated from dipshit to dumbfrick.
I'm so honored!
quote:
The American taxpayer is forced to pay about 215 billion dollars per year, supporting criminal illegals.
You quoted me clearly talking about legal immigration, and you go off about illegal immigrants. And you have the nerve to call me a dumbfrick? Which are you, dumb or dishonest?
quote:I wouldn't know, I was clearly asking how increased legal immigration would hurt Americans.
How much fricking gall can someone have, to pretend Americans aren't being hurt by criminal illegal invasion?
This post was edited on 9/25/19 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 9/25/19 at 3:40 pm to troyt37
quote:I know what they are. And I also know that they are a small minority of the total illegal immigrant population. And I also know that cutting off that qualifier was a deliberate attempt to shove his platform WAY to the left.
I'll give you three guesses as to what "Dreamers" parents are, dumbfrick. Care to take a stab at it?
Posted on 9/25/19 at 3:45 pm to troyt37
quote:You lying piece of shite. Where the frick did that period come from, then?
It was cut off on my computer screen, dumbfrick. Nothing nefarious.
And if you believed what you quoted without the qualifier that I called you on, then you're dumber than most of the dummies around here.
quote:My assertion is that he would deport illegals, and using the number of DACA recipients (800k?) plus their parents, that's at most 2.4 million people that he wouldn't deport. That's leaves on the low end 7.5 million illegals that he WOULD deport, or like 25 million according to some estimates you guys throw out.
The point is moot, regardless, since your assertion is that Puto would deport illegals, and Dreamers parents are in fact criminal illegals.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 3:50 pm to Korkstand
quote:
I'm so honored!
You're headed right for frickstick, and if you don't rub both of your brain cells together, and try really hard, you're going to end up Captain frickstick. Nobody has ever made it past Captain frickstick, I've always theorized that it's because they're too fricking stupid to breathe, but you may be the one. You go, dumbfrick.
quote:
You quoted me clearly taking about legal immigration, and you go off about illegal immigrants. And you have the nerve to call my a dumbfrick? Which are you, dumb or dishonest?
You leftist twats use immigration and illegal immigration interchangeably. Pretty much the whole pitiful conversation has been about criminal illegals, and not citizens. I can see you're confused, but that's because you're a shite-eater for the socialist democrat party. Be better.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 3:56 pm to Korkstand
quote:
My assertion is that he would deport illegals,
quote:
that's at most 2.4 million people that he wouldn't deport.
frickstick level achieved. Have a twinkie.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 4:08 pm to troyt37
quote:Please explain the conservative view on economics with a growing population.
Once you ignore that, let's talk about the downward pressure on wages.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 4:15 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Please explain the conservative view on economics with a growing population.
Nobody has ever made Captain frickstick in one day. You better pace yourself. How about you study up on the principles of supply and demand first, with an eye on what allowing millions of people to walk across our border does to the supply side of labor.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 4:22 pm to troyt37
quote:Uh no, that is just you lacking reading comprehension, or just ignoring context altogether. I even said "legals" in the post.
You leftist twats use immigration and illegal immigration interchangeably.
quote:How many times have I said "path to citizenship" in this thread? How many democratic candidates talk about a "path to citizenship" in their immigration platforms? All of them, I'm pretty sure.
Pretty much the whole pitiful conversation has been about criminal illegals, and not citizens.
But does anyone on the right want to talk about fixing the immigration process, or is it all just talk about punishment? My question was what is the perceived downside to an increase in legal immigration, to a conservative?
quote:Get out of here with that bullshite.
I can see you're confused, but that's because you're a shite-eater for the socialist democrat party.
quote:Back at ya
Be better.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 4:26 pm to troyt37
quote:quote:
My assertion is that he would deport illegals,quote:
that's at most 2.4 million people that he wouldn't deport.
frickstick level achieved. Have a twinkie.
As expected, conservative says that if you support deportation of illegals but have an exception for a small minority of them (who have applied for a classification under a law), then you do not support deportation. It's always all or nothing, black and white. You just can't help but push anything left of yourself all the way to the left, can you?
Posted on 9/25/19 at 4:28 pm to wmr
quote:
It is beyond time to divide up and move on.
IMHO there will be another secession from the USA at some future point. None of us may live long enough to witness, it, but, the USA is self-destructing with Leftism and, as the parasite slowly kills the host, there will be another secession movement.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 4:36 pm to wmr
It feels that way because we are finally winning. The left putting up the biggest tantrum fit stink ever because they usually get their way and it aint happening.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 4:38 pm to Korkstand
quote:
it's ridiculous to claim that a significant number of libs want open borders
What the frick?
Posted on 9/25/19 at 4:39 pm to wmr
No, it’s beyond time to purge this country of the Lib Trash cancer by any means necessary.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 4:46 pm to troyt37
quote:No need, I'm more well-versed than most.
How about you study up on the principles of supply and demand first
quote:The simple answer is wages will fall, but reality is never that simple.
with an eye on what allowing millions of people to walk across our border does to the supply side of labor.
Are you telling me that an economy cannot flourish with a rapidly growing population?
Posted on 9/25/19 at 4:47 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:Have you read the thread? If not, define "open borders".quote:What the frick?
it's ridiculous to claim that a significant number of libs want open borders
Posted on 9/25/19 at 4:50 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Have you read the thread? If not, define "open borders".
Oh give it a rest dude.
You've warped "open borders" into something that couldn't exist at all. You've basically argued that if everything you DO is in conflict with having effective borders, but SAY you aren't for open borders, then you aren't for open borders.
It's completely asinine. It's like catching you wife cheating on you 5 times but then telling me she's not unfaithful because she's told you she doesn't support infidelity.
Posted on 9/25/19 at 4:57 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Have you read the thread?
Yes.
Again, I ask: what the frick?
Page 9 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News