- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Where does WH get "moral authority" to condemn torture?
Posted on 12/11/14 at 1:52 pm to mmcgrath
Posted on 12/11/14 at 1:52 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Besides totally misrepresenting the truth when it comes to numbers or what was actually done, yes: torturing prisoners is morally reprehensible.
Oh really, link?
And what case are you talking about?
Posted on 12/11/14 at 1:57 pm to mmcgrath
Three people were water boarded. I think that qualifies as "only a handful". the number of journalists that had themselves waterboarded is greater than the actual number of detainees that were waterboarded by the CIA.
This post was edited on 12/11/14 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 12/11/14 at 2:13 pm to pistolpete23
quote:
“How do you have moral authority when innocent civilians are killed by drones?”
IMHO, drones, cruise missiles and other kinds of pushbutton warfare are immoral. It makes it too easy for politicians to pull the trigger, and we wind up losing sight of how bad war really is.
Some may feel differently, but I'd prefer being tortured for multiple years vice being killed humanely.
Posted on 12/11/14 at 2:15 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
For the record, I think both are useful tools.
Same here!
Popular
Back to top


0





