Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Where does WH get "moral authority" to condemn torture? | Page 2 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Where does WH get "moral authority" to condemn torture?

Posted on 12/11/14 at 1:52 pm to
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
86860 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Besides totally misrepresenting the truth when it comes to numbers or what was actually done, yes: torturing prisoners is morally reprehensible.



Oh really, link?

And what case are you talking about?
Posted by Al Dante
Member since Mar 2013
1860 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 1:57 pm to
Three people were water boarded. I think that qualifies as "only a handful". the number of journalists that had themselves waterboarded is greater than the actual number of detainees that were waterboarded by the CIA.
This post was edited on 12/11/14 at 2:01 pm
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

“How do you have moral authority when innocent civilians are killed by drones?”


IMHO, drones, cruise missiles and other kinds of pushbutton warfare are immoral. It makes it too easy for politicians to pull the trigger, and we wind up losing sight of how bad war really is.

Some may feel differently, but I'd prefer being tortured for multiple years vice being killed humanely.
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
24215 posts
Posted on 12/11/14 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

For the record, I think both are useful tools.


Same here!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram