- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WSJ: Crack-Up at Heritage
Posted on 11/10/25 at 10:25 am to Snoop Dawg
Posted on 11/10/25 at 10:25 am to Snoop Dawg
quote:
Supporting Western Civilization is America first, you small minded retard.
Exactly. And we need strong allies.
0
Posted on 11/10/25 at 10:31 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
quote:
Anyone on the right supporting this clown is stupid, evil, or paid off.
And anyone on the right supporting deplatforming those with who they disagree are stupid, evil or paid off.
When did he say he wanted Fuentes deplatformed? He just said the dude is a plant and people who hang on what he says as truth, are morons. Sounds like he just has an opinion that Fuentes is a phony and he sucks. That's not demanding he is deplatformed.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 10:32 am to Toomer Deplorable
Endless war is big business.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 10:34 am to tide06
quote:
Why the right/MAGA refused to support it was completely baffling to me.
It made a lot of GOPe groups look like controlled opposition the way they ran from it as far as I’m concerned.
Because Project 25 was a major and effective fear mongering talking point of the Democrats in the 2024 election. It was literally about the only thing they had that remotely worked for them.
Were you paying attention at all? WTF.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 10:39 am to prplhze2000
Any political/ideological movement with influencers at its core is doomed.
I suspect the loose new right and MAGA will experience this soon enough.
Something else with some of that flavor will take its place, the grifters and influencers will become prominent within it, and it'll fail too.
When all of your "fights" are on podcasts and YouTube, there is just no real skin in the game sufficient to keep out those with purely self-interested motives.
I suspect the loose new right and MAGA will experience this soon enough.
Something else with some of that flavor will take its place, the grifters and influencers will become prominent within it, and it'll fail too.
When all of your "fights" are on podcasts and YouTube, there is just no real skin in the game sufficient to keep out those with purely self-interested motives.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 11:07 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
Because Project 25 was a major and effective fear mongering talking point of the Democrats in the 2024 election. It was literally about the only thing they had that remotely worked for them. Were you paying attention at all? WTF.
It was the only way to take control back of the federal apparatus and there was nothing remotely controversial about what was being proposed.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:04 pm to SirWinston
quote:
From what I can tell, 95% of the people who dismiss NF
He called Vances wife a Jeet, instead of Indian
quote:
Nick Fuentes on VP Vance: “fat guy who’s married to a jeet and works for a gay CIA fed. It doesn't matter what he says, it matters who he is & he's NOT one of us."
Thats like calling Clarence Thomas a n****r, rather than black
No one should be interviewing him, let alone listening to him
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:15 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Any political/ideological movement with influencers at its core is doomed.
Agreed. We ditched legacy media because they were secret influencers. Absolutely no reason to put any amount of "authority" over a party or movement in the hands of people that openly tell you they are trying to influence you to their cause.
People need to learn to digest the signal and spit out the noise, in all cases. Not latch onto a paid promoter.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 5:46 pm to Snoop Dawg
quote:
I never said they should be deplatformed
Then that comment doesn’t apply to you.
quote:
I’m saying they are fake right being paid off by our enemies, and only idiots on the right are supporting them and should be ridiculed
And I say the Israel-First brigade in the GOPe are fake right and only idiots on the right are supporting them and should be ridiculed.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 5:55 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
When did he say he wanted Fuentes deplatformed?
I didn’t say he did.
Yet neocon “schmuck” Mark Levin certainly has called for deplatforming MAGA critics of Israel.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 12:22 am to Sizzle_DAWG
quote:
Most of your claims are unsubstantiated. Have you seen divorce rates in our country? What’s wrong with not voting if neither party supports the American middle class?
no they aren't. they're all public knowledge that can be easily found on x, google, etc.
yes, the divorce rates (or at least what is assumed) is high. But what effect does that have on an individual? none. it's a logical fallacy to assume that a high divorce rate has some bearing on your prospects. if you choose a good woman and live by good values and don't give an option for divorce, then your likelihood of not getting divorced is substantially higher.
regarding voting, I hate the republican party as much as anybody. but the fact is that they are the only option if we want to remain a "free" country. if the dems win across the board, on day one with a supermajority they will stack the court and make PR and DC states. the republican party, or any future party based on constitutional freedoms will be overwhelmed. they will build back up the deep state money and influence machine bigger and stronger. at this point, the only way is through the republican party, unfortunately.
Look up Christopher Brunet, he authored a piece on the groypers and child pron.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:47 am to Masterag
Divorce rates DO affect the individual. Your response falls flat because obviously we live in a society and that statistic trickles down. I don’t know what your marital status is or how old you are, but if you’ve been in the dating market for the last 5 years it absolutely has gone to hell compared to a decade ago.
It’s easy to say “find a good woman” when the vast majority either have narcissistic traits, are whores or warped by feminism/social media. This even goes for the ones who are traditionally “good” on paper.
There are definitely some quality ones out there, but it takes A LOT longer to find one that would be a good candidate for marriage.
You’re still ignoring Trump being friends with Epstein and other elites involved with those parties back in the 90’s. Those are both guilty by association if that’s the hill you’re willing to die on.
It’s easy to say “find a good woman” when the vast majority either have narcissistic traits, are whores or warped by feminism/social media. This even goes for the ones who are traditionally “good” on paper.
There are definitely some quality ones out there, but it takes A LOT longer to find one that would be a good candidate for marriage.
You’re still ignoring Trump being friends with Epstein and other elites involved with those parties back in the 90’s. Those are both guilty by association if that’s the hill you’re willing to die on.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 6:52 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 6:53 am to RobbBobb
Shut up old man
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News