- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: City and QSG investigation
Posted on 9/6/17 at 4:04 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 9/6/17 at 4:04 pm to Draconian Sanctions
Enter SCH's reply of, "Well, the naming rights for the stadium and shirt sponsor!?!"
Why aren't you raising a fuss about Leicester and their owners sponsoring both the stadium and shirt?
People only give a crap when whomever they're complaining about is a direct threat to them.
Why aren't you raising a fuss about Leicester and their owners sponsoring both the stadium and shirt?
People only give a crap when whomever they're complaining about is a direct threat to them.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 4:09 pm to McCaigBro69
quote:
Enter SCH's reply of, "Well, the naming rights for the stadium and shirt sponsor!?!"
You really want to go down that road of why it happened and how your "sponsor" tried to go way higher than the market value.
quote:I don't think people are ok with Leicester either but then again its only 4 million a year....
Why aren't you raising a fuss about Leicester and their owners sponsoring both the stadium and shirt? People only give a crap when whomever they're complaining about is a direct threat to them.
This post was edited on 9/6/17 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 9/6/17 at 4:12 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
You really want to go down that road of why it happened and how your "sponsor" tried to go way high the market value
I will admit, at the time the shirt sponsor did seem and was high, but now it's already been researched and found that City's kit deal and shirt sponsorship are both well below market value.
But that's primarily because of Chelsea and United getting fricking paid.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 4:16 pm to McCaigBro69
quote:
I will admit, at the time the shirt sponsor did seem and was high, but now it's already been researched and found that City's kit deal and shirt sponsorship are both well below market value.
How so? City have not won that much since the take over. Are not a world wide brand, and struggle to sell out their stadium. 40 million is about right for the limited success of the club when comparing to other clubs its still gets more than.
quote:Bc they are two of the biggest brands in the world. Champions league winning clubs that have won the league more than City....
But that's primarily because of Chelsea and United getting fricking paid.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 4:24 pm to StraightCashHomey21
This is the first time I've been in this thread in a while and I just wanted to say 
Posted on 9/6/17 at 4:33 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Are not a world wide brand
Compared to the giants, no. But to say the club's brand hasn't grown exponentially since 2011 is just dumb.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 5:01 pm to McCaigBro69
It still isn't a big enough brand to warrant a shirt sponsor deal bigger than Arsenal or Liverpool but yet they have one.
This post was edited on 9/6/17 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 9/6/17 at 5:18 pm to StraightCashHomey21
I'd just like to point out the hilarity of the disconnect between DS's posts in this thread (and other QSG threads) and his poli-board posts.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 5:24 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
It still isn't a big enough brand to warrant a shirt sponsor deal bigger than Arsenal or Liverpool but yet they have one.
They've achieved twice as much as both of those clubs over the last decade. The only reason that's important is because of the growth of social media and the ability for anyone to watch a game anywhere in the world.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 5:45 pm to McCaigBro69
City still has decades to catch up to either club and both are more popular in the social media world
The only place City has a chance of being more popular is in the Middle East
The only place City has a chance of being more popular is in the Middle East
This post was edited on 9/6/17 at 5:49 pm
Posted on 9/6/17 at 5:59 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Whoa, Arsenal has nearly 3x as many Twitter followers as City. Dang.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 6:09 pm to WarSlamEagle
Also have 10 million IG followers
Posted on 9/6/17 at 6:16 pm to McCaigBro69
quote:
No clue what PSG's financials were the last two years, but City was in the green..
You mean in the black
quote:
United was the only club to make more profit than them in 15-16.
False again, Spurs made more profit as well. City operating in the black once or twice won't be a trend until it the club is self sufficient
stop believing everything on the city sub Reddit
Posted on 9/6/17 at 6:18 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
PSG makes money but has several very large deals with Qatari companies
Deals ruled that can't be used as income when profits are determined.
The fact that PSG is owned by the Qatar government as well as every major company in the country due to its laws. That's going to look shady bc it is false revenues.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 6:26 pm to StraightCashHomey21
I love these threads.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 6:40 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Deals ruled that can't be used as income when profits are determined.
Under the bogus FFP regime, but that doesn't change the fact that PSG have these contracts.
Posted on 9/6/17 at 6:48 pm to Draconian Sanctions
It's like you just forget common sense when this come up
Conspiracy this conspiracy that
Conspiracy this conspiracy that
Posted on 9/6/17 at 7:09 pm to StraightCashHomey21
The biggest conspiracy theory of all is the idea that UEFA passed legislation for reasons other than personal enrichment
Posted on 9/6/17 at 8:32 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Perusing the last page is see the exact SCH, mccaigbro, DS circle jerk I was expecting.
Popular
Back to top



1





