Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Official Manchester Derby Thread | Page 15 | Soccer Board
Started By
Message

re: Official Manchester Derby Thread

Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:11 pm to
Posted by corndogluvr
Folsom
Member since May 2009
183 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:11 pm to
Yeah, not a City supporter. But a ABU supporter.
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160203 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:13 pm to
Vinnie fricking Jones?
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51401 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:14 pm to
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:15 pm to
Yeah, well that was around when he got me following. Maybe it was after Euro 2008.

And they didn't start spending a ton or get good until after I followed them. They were right around the middle of the table that year.
Posted by ATLienTiger
NOLA
Member since Oct 2006
27084 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:16 pm to
Yeah I was just as shocked. He's having s beer and taking pics with people.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
25975 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

I don't understand that to be honest. City is bad for the game.


rooting for man united would make me feel like i needed to throw up. i frickin hate them
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
470617 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

United and Pool do it the right way and are far from the yankees

which of Man U's players come from its academy?

De Gea? no
evra?
vidic? no
Fedinand? no
jones? no
rooney? no
chicharito? no
young? no
nani? no
anderson? no
berbatov? no
smalling? no
sung? no
carrick? no
jonny evans? yes
ryan gigs? yes
welbeck? yes
scholes? yes
fletcher? yes
Posted by Dijkstra
Michael J. Fox's location in time.
Member since Sep 2007
8745 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:27 pm to
Rooney was 17 when they signed him, same with Ronaldo. It's not like they're out spending 240 million pounds on strikers in days. There's a bit of a difference. No successful club is mostly from their academy. The academy system just allows them to hopefully get a few with some loyalty, nothing more or less.
Posted by NewtonReb
Member since Aug 2011
737 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:28 pm to
Boom
Posted by glassman
Next to the beer taps at Finn's
Member since Oct 2008
117981 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Yeah I was just as shocked.


I hung out all day on a Saturday with David O'Hara at Finn's. The guy who was Fitzy in The Departed. That mofo can drink.
Posted by ATLienTiger
NOLA
Member since Oct 2006
27084 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:31 pm to
Glass, put in a word to get an Arsenal legend there for us. I might have stuck around longer

As for O'Hara, I would not doubt it. That Scottish bastard just looks like he could dry up a bar.
This post was edited on 4/30/12 at 4:32 pm
Posted by NOTORlOUSD
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2010
5051 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:31 pm to
quote:

Rooney was 17 when they signed him, same with Ronaldo. It's not like they're out spending 240 million pounds on strikers in days. There's a bit of a difference. No successful club is mostly from their academy. The academy system just allows them to hopefully get a few with some loyalty, nothing more or less.

Agreed. In my book, a player who was bought before age 21 and stays with the club for 3+ years is essentially "homegrown". For example, I consider Oxlade-Chamberlain, Ramsey, and Walcott to be homegrown Arsenal players even though they were brought up in other academies.
This post was edited on 4/30/12 at 4:32 pm
Posted by corndogluvr
Folsom
Member since May 2009
183 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:32 pm to
Yeah 30 million pounds in 2004 was cheap for a 17
year old
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
470617 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

Rooney was 17 when they signed him, same with Ronaldo

so how does this make it better?

quote:

It's not like they're out spending 240 million pounds on strikers in days.

they were ahead. city had to catch up (in a price-inflated market, mind you)

quote:

There's a bit of a difference

well kun, nasri, balloteli, etc weren't exactly old

Man U paid 25.5M pounds for nani a few years back and just signed ashley fricking young in the offseason

let's not act like Man U doesn't throw money around

Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:36 pm to
Yeah, United = City in terms of spending. Whatever makes you sleep better at night.
Posted by WarSlamEagle
Manchester United Fan
Member since Sep 2011
24611 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Agreed. In my book, a player who was bought before age 21 and stays with the club for 3+ years is essentially "homegrown". For example, I consider Oxlade-Chamberlain, Ramsey, and Walcott to be homegrown Arsenal players even though they were brought up in other academies.

:kige:
Posted by ATLienTiger
NOLA
Member since Oct 2006
27084 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:37 pm to
What have I missed here, seeing numerous multi-quote posts arguing something? Nothing but SAF's tactics can be in question from this match right?

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
470617 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

Yeah, United = City in terms of spending.

city has spent a frick ton in the past few years trying to catch up with a top flight roster

man u has consistently spent a frick ton over the past 30 years or so
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
470617 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

What have I missed here

it's OK to spend a frick ton of money if you do it like Man U, but if you don't have the advantage of having lots of money for decades to build up a consistent squad, it's horrible to spend a frick ton in a smaller period to build a team to compete with Man U

basically, whoever got there first (decades ago) deserves to be there, and people will rationalize justifications to keep that status quo valid, while similar behavior done slightly differently is horrible and will ruin the game
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160203 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 4:44 pm to
I'm not buying their spending strategy. "Spending to catch up" isn't buying a ton of strikers and having to sell them off at discounted prices.

With the money City has, they could build a treble team.

Instead, they'll lose money on Dzeko and I don't know if they'll get back their 23 mil on Balotelli either.
Jump to page
Page First 13 14 15 16 17 ... 21
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 15 of 21Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram