- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | USA  |
| Location: | College Station |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | Baw |
| Number of Posts: | 40833 |
| Registered on: | 4/9/2014 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
Brilliant
Something you’ve never been accused of
0
Why are black women so dumb?
Imagine 3 more years of ICE raids and arrests
Posted by texag7 on 1/16/26 at 6:44 pm
re: BREAKING: Trump hints US could 'pull out of NATO' over Greenland
Posted by texag7 on 1/16/26 at 3:09 pm to Tiger n Austin
quote:
Since when does Trump give 2 shits what another coequal branch of government thinks.
I’m glad he doesn’t care.
quote:
You like funding 31 other countries military? That surprises me.
He’d sell his soul for the US to send a Marine from Iowa to die for Ukraine
SFP says the women in his wine & painting classes think deportations are bad and Trump is losing support.
re: What's at stake if we don't crush the marxist insurrection in MSP
Posted by texag7 on 1/16/26 at 9:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
One of the dumbest posts ever on this site.
Does it top your “Trump was convicted of rape” post you had to delete?
re: Dear Conservative. The Insurrection Act history lesson.
Posted by texag7 on 1/16/26 at 9:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There is a huge gap in an admin action being legal and good policy and popular.
His policies are very popular here. Maybe not in the wine tasting circles you run in
Liberal economist comes to terms with Trump Tariffs
Posted by texag7 on 1/16/26 at 9:24 am
LINK
Written by Robert Kuttner. Founder of the Economic Policy Institute, economics professor and liberal activist.
Written by Robert Kuttner. Founder of the Economic Policy Institute, economics professor and liberal activist.
quote:
China’s trade surplus with the entire world hit an all-time record of $1.19 trillion in 2025, Beijing just announced. But here’s the stunner in the report. China’s surplus with the U.S. declined by 22 percent. The reason: U.S. tariffs on Chinese exports average over 50 percent.
That’s a good outcome, since China’s chronic trade surplus is based on illegal mercantilist policies, including currency manipulation, subsidies, and domestic market protection, that cost the U.S. and other nations jobs. In the past, the main loser has been the United States. China simply diverted subsidized exports to other nations with lower tariffs.
quote:
Trump’s policies have raised the average tariff rate from about 2.4 percent in late 2024 to 17 percent by late 2025, the highest in nearly a century. A disaster, right? Well, maybe not quite.
quote:
For starters, inflation is running below projections.
quote:
Tariffs have had surprisingly little impact on higher consumer prices. “Tariff pass-through to consumers has been much milder than anticipated,” Olu Sonola, head of U.S. economic research at Fitch Ratings, wrote in a recent research note. Yet revenue from tariffs brought in close to $300 billion in 2025, up from about $80 billion in 2024, and is currently on track to produce over $350 billion this year.
quote:
In addition, it’s easy to overstate the impact of tariffs on household costs, since imports are only about 14 percent of GDP. In other words, there are no tariffs on 86 percent of GDP. The high tariff rate on China skews the averages. Excluding China, the effective tariff rate on the rest of the world, adjusting for trade share and exempt categories, is not the average 17 percent. It’s well below 10 percent.
re: What's at stake if we don't crush the marxist insurrection in MSP
Posted by texag7 on 1/16/26 at 8:04 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
One of the most emotional people on the site :lol:
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict.
Posted by texag7 on 1/15/26 at 12:25 pm to VolSquatch
I would say the accuracy of ISW reports hover around 10%
“Economist” :lol:
not even a real job
not even a real job
quote:
That isn’t what’s happening.
It’s the dead of winter
quote:
100% aggiehank
I made a help board thread for him. Go check it out
re: ICE Agent reportedly suffered internal bleeding from being hit by SUV
Posted by texag7 on 1/14/26 at 11:17 am to RollTide1987
Old girl had some external bleeding :lol:
Inside of that car looked like a paint can exploded
Inside of that car looked like a paint can exploded
re: The DOJ has 117,129 employees. Six quit and CBS calls it MASS EXODUS hits DOJ!!
Posted by texag7 on 1/14/26 at 10:22 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Childish and a bit sad.
You’re c/o 86? So a 60-61 year old “man”.
And still conduct yourself here like a teenager.
Jack Smith will testify publicly on Jan 22
Posted by texag7 on 1/13/26 at 8:02 pm
LINK
quote:
FIRST ON FOX: Former special counsel Jack Smith will testify in a hearing before the House Judiciary Committee next week, giving Republican and Democratic lawmakers on the panel a chance to grill him in a public setting on his prosecutions of President Donald Trump.
Smith will appear before the committee on Jan. 22, one month after he sat for a closed-door deposition with the committee and testified for eight hours about his special counsel work, a source familiar told Fox News Digital.
re: When will the “Supreme Court” “rule” on tariffs?
Posted by texag7 on 1/13/26 at 1:46 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
RelentlessAnalysis aka AggieHank86
Posted by texag7 on 1/13/26 at 1:46 pm
re: When will the “Supreme Court” “rule” on tariffs?
Posted by texag7 on 1/13/26 at 1:44 pm to ClientNumber9
quote:
Why did you put the Supreme Court in quotations?
Because it’s a political cabal.
I would not trust Jumanji Jackson to take my trash to the curb properly.
When will the “Supreme Court” “rule” on tariffs?
Posted by texag7 on 1/13/26 at 1:14 pm
I thought a decision was expected today?
Popular
8
