- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
hipgnosis
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 1226 |
| Registered on: | 3/3/2015 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Forum
Message
re: What do members of the "Little 8" really think of the...
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/14/15 at 6:10 pm to Mister Tee
Take away Auburn football from your life and you've got nothing.
Does the truth hurt?
Does the truth hurt?
0
re: Deregulation of conference championship games expected to pass
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/14/15 at 5:57 pm to nebraskafaninwi
This is precisely the same type of thing we see in the corporate/political world.
Those with the most power, the biggest brand ect make the rules.
This benefits the biggest brands in college football, not college football as a whole.
Those with the most power, the biggest brand ect make the rules.
This benefits the biggest brands in college football, not college football as a whole.
Graduate Transfers
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/14/15 at 5:30 pm
How do you feel about them?
Seems like it's against the spirit of college football to basically have a free agent period to grab a quarterback.
With kids staying on campus taking classes 12 months a year, and the common RS for almost all quarterbacks -- its seems like theres always going to be a couple decent qb's available on the free agent market every year.
Seems like it's against the spirit of college football to basically have a free agent period to grab a quarterback.
With kids staying on campus taking classes 12 months a year, and the common RS for almost all quarterbacks -- its seems like theres always going to be a couple decent qb's available on the free agent market every year.
re: High School Education
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/13/15 at 6:16 pm to bamafan1001
Abolish the entire construct of our education system which was designed by mind control scientists, funded by an elite who said 'I want a nation of workers, not a nation of thinkers'.
It's kind of amusing that people wonder why the education system is a mess.
Look at the root.
It's kind of amusing that people wonder why the education system is a mess.
Look at the root.
Dude, no.
Thinking cancer research is a joke has nothing to do with paranoia.
Thinking cancer research is a joke has nothing to do with paranoia.
re: So, one of my millennial friends thinks Big Bang Theory is tGOAT sitcom.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 9:22 pm to Stir of Echoes
I watch that 70s on nick at night every now and then.
Watch the old old ones online.
They're like heroin. Usually get the craving when I'm overworked.
And I have other mindless habits.
I don't do conspiracy stuff as much as some of you dingleberries probably think.
I'm cool w my level of keeldness.
Watch the old old ones online.
They're like heroin. Usually get the craving when I'm overworked.
And I have other mindless habits.
I don't do conspiracy stuff as much as some of you dingleberries probably think.
I'm cool w my level of keeldness.
re: So, one of my millennial friends thinks Big Bang Theory is tGOAT sitcom.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 8:55 pm to Stir of Echoes
Millennial checking in who doesn't like Big Bang.
Don't really watch sitcoms now.
The ones that I remember watching a lot of when I was younger.
That 70s, Growing Pains, Wonder Years, Fresh Prince, I love Lucy, Gilligan.
Don't really watch sitcoms now.
The ones that I remember watching a lot of when I was younger.
That 70s, Growing Pains, Wonder Years, Fresh Prince, I love Lucy, Gilligan.
quote:
This statement should end this sad thread, but it won't. Paranoia (a mental condition characterized by delusions of persecution, unwarranted jealousy, or exaggerated self-importance, typically elaborated into an organized system. It may be an aspect of chronic personality disorder, of drug abuse, or of a serious condition such as schizophrenia in which the person loses touch with reality) is a remarkable force in many people's lives.
There doesn't seem to be much that can be done about it as a social phenomenon. Individually, it can be treated but the subject must be willing to undergo cognitive behavior management and submit to medication. Because of their twisted perceptions of reality, of course, those who are afflicted with paranoia are extremely resistant.
All we can do is watch people who suffer from this condition and hope they don't decide to attempt enforcing their version of reality on the population at large.
I guess this is a half reasonable come-back for all the robot jokes directed at you.
Listen, CP30, there isn't anything crazy about believing cancer research is bogus -- especially when it's paired with comments from well respected and accomplished scientists.
Look at the up-down votes, seems there're quit a few people who feel the same.
Get out of here with that shite.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 6:45 pm to the808bass
Feel free to email me, I know you have mine, and I'll link you to Facebook if you don't believe me.
At this point I care more about clearing the name of the person you think I am, because I know that person.
Otherwise, you can believe me.
At this point I care more about clearing the name of the person you think I am, because I know that person.
Otherwise, you can believe me.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 6:40 pm to Roger Klarvin
I mean, this is almost sad on your part.
Here we have quotes from respected and accomplished medical professionals telling us that cancer research is a fraud.
As intuitive and intelligent people we should easily be able to easily see the mechanisms that aid this fraud.
Yet you're denying there is fraud in cancer research.
Worse yet, you're trying to lump in the moon landing conspiracy into your defense for why there isn't fraud in cancer research.
Here we have quotes from respected and accomplished medical professionals telling us that cancer research is a fraud.
As intuitive and intelligent people we should easily be able to easily see the mechanisms that aid this fraud.
Yet you're denying there is fraud in cancer research.
Worse yet, you're trying to lump in the moon landing conspiracy into your defense for why there isn't fraud in cancer research.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 6:29 pm to Roger Klarvin
Uh, well, there are like a thousand other reasons those things are conspiracies, but um, okay.
I mean, dude, cancer research is a joke, I think a lot of people understand that -- for all the many reasons that make it a joke.
I mean, dude, cancer research is a joke, I think a lot of people understand that -- for all the many reasons that make it a joke.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 6:23 pm to the808bass
quote:
St. Louis is small, breh. You know this. It's ok. I'll let it go.
Do you think I'm married?
You've mentioned that before, and I'm certain you have the wrong person.
There are more than one person with my name.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 6:21 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
How surprising is it that the conspiracy theorist believes in a conspiracy theory?
Where is there 'theory' here?
Seems there is more than sound evidence for the fact cancer research is a joke.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 6:19 pm to the808bass
quote:
Estimate the percentage of household income for you from healthcare.
I'm going with 65% for you. About right?
0%, as far as I know..
Am I missing something?
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 6:18 pm to the808bass
quote:
Nutrition isn't at the front burner for Americans. That isn't the doctors' fault anymore than it's teachers faults that kids' parents don't always value education.
Absolutely.
I blame our nutrition problems on many things.
But, that doesn't change the fact that nutrition is most certainly not at the front burner in mainstream medicine -- as it's a reactionary practice first and foremost.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 6:15 pm to the808bass
quote:
It's really not surprising that you talk out your arse while you cash checks from healthcare.
I don't even know what this means.
But, really, how surprising is it that the pharm salesmen defends pharm sales.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 6:14 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Blame the federal government and the baby boomer legislators for limiting the study of medical uses of cannabinoids. The medical field is full of researchrs ready to dive into that.
Your complex over any medical topic is showing big time.
I'm sure there are medical people ready to investigate cannabis.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 6:12 pm to the808bass
It's really not surprising that someone in pharm sales doesn't thing big pharm is unethical.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 6:09 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Moreover, this entire concept is foolish.
What concept is foolish?
That cancer research is a fraud? Because that's what the thread is about.
----
We're not going to agree on the morality and ethics of big pharm.
We're also not going to agree on nutrition being at the front burner of mainstream medicine.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 6:05 pm to the808bass
quote:
Earlier you said we know cannabis heals cancer. How do we know that if the research is illegal?
You're being difficult for the sake of being difficult.
Cannabis has been researched, but the research is limited, especially in this country. It's showing the ability to kill cancer cells, stop cell division, and speeding up waste management, which aids with cell death. Among other things. But this is all in animal and petri dish testing.
In humans the proof has been in the results, which has been positive.
Researchers commissioned by the government just admitted that cannabis kills cancer cells, but it's only in animals, and it was commissioned by the gov't. It's difficult for independent research to be done. Sadly, they knew about this in the 70s, but that research was shut down and suppressed.
An exciting aspect is the new ground being broke with cannabinoids.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 5:39 pm to the808bass
quote:
Also, the kidneys regulate pH. Not so much the bones.
Yeah. It steals nutrients from bones/teeth to regulate through kidneys.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 5:38 pm to Stir of Echoes
quote:
If you were diagnosed with cancer, what course of treatment would you seek?
Probably something that couldn't be answered until the moment it needed to be.
But I'll say it's unfortunate that it's so difficult, expensive, and potentially illegal to do things unconventionally. To get really good cannabis oil is nearly impossible, which would be my first choice.
Also, it's unfortunate that so much money/time/effort is put towards researching the institutional way while it's basically illegal to research cannabis as a method for curing cancer.
(I know cannabis has been a focus here, but I know there are other ways besides this that are gaining popularity for killing cancer).
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 5:26 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
A healthy, hemodynamically stable individual should live their entire life between at an arterial pH of about 7.4 +/- 0.05. What you eat will not change that unless you regularly overdose on aspirin, drink large amounts of household cleaning products, etc. At the point where a person's pH has changed enough to matter at all, cancer is the least of their worries.
You're missing the fact that the body steals nutrients to balance its pH, adding alkaline foods to an acidic diet helps balance the body without it robbing itself.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 5:24 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
I actually agree with you on this one
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/12/15 at 5:23 pm to the808bass
quote:
Your body's pH will fluctuate between around 7.35 and 7.45. What you eat won't change that over the long haul. It's not shocking anymore how often you're absolutely and incontrovertibly wrong.
One, I was responding to the claim that lemons are acidic in the body.
Two, I'm aware the body regulates its pH. But it does so by stealing calcium from bones and teeth, as well as other nutrients. Adding lemon water to your routine is a good way to create balance in the body without it robbing itself.
There are so many benefits from lemons it's too much to mention.
We're just starting to understand CBD in cannabis, THC has always been front and center, but now the cannabinoids are becoming the focus to understanding its healing powers -- just as we're learning about flavonoids and the like in things like lemons.
quote:
It is balanced by your respiratory rate and kidneys. Adjusting acidity in your diet will impact the pH of your urine.
Our diets are too acidic.
quote:
edit: Also, lemons are acidic.
No. It's alkaline when it's metabolized.
Please. It's shocking that people like you say things without any knowledge at all on an issue.
A quick google search about lemons neutralizing acidity will give you plenty to look at.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/11/15 at 5:51 pm to PrivatePublic
quote:
I don't think the human body can survive in an alkaline environment either
For a regular person it's about balancing PH with alkaline foods, it's not about creating a fully alkaline environment, it's about reducing the level of acidity in the body to healthier levels, which would reduce the chance of getting cancer -- something we really don't hear about from our health professionals.
It's one of the big reasons it's recommended to start your day with lemon water.
quote:
a cure for cancer would reap MASSIVE rewards on the short term for the finder.
Same logic would go for an alternative fuel -- which we know is possibly, but it hasn't happened.
It hasn't because the system and everything it touches benefits, it's so vast and expansive it's impossible to break, same with cancer.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/11/15 at 5:36 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
There is a difference between those doing cancer research and those doing fundraising for cancer research. Learn the difference.
That was a quote from a scientist, so maybe he should learn the difference?
And don't you suspect that those funding cancer research decide the parameters ect?
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/11/15 at 2:06 pm to OGtigerfan73
quote:
The doctor who first discovered cancer probably knows less about the disease than a below average Emergency Room doctor today. Medical science has come a long way. Oh and your crazy but what do I know I'm just another member of the mindless public.
Despite your post being inaccurate and presumptuous -- it doesn't negate or counter any of the quotes from scientists who say cancer research is a fraud.
Basically, your post was meaningless.
re: Quotes from scientists supporting the cancer fraud.
Posted by hipgnosis on 5/11/15 at 2:03 pm to Yellerhammer5
quote:
The ancient Egyptians?
I thought it didn't need to be said, but apparently it does -- the 'root' of cancer was discovered by Dr Warburg, obviously visible tumors were discovered long before Warburg's findings.
Popular
21
